Is Poetry Useful?

May 21, 2025 General Insights No Comments

Poetry is often seen as beautiful but unnecessary — the opposite of practical. But what if that assumption hides a much deeper misunderstanding?

This blog explores the role of poetry not just as art, but as a form of life-changing usefulness — in science, healthcare, education, and beyond.

Opening the question

Poetry is admired, quoted, even feared a little — but seldom called useful. The word itself seems at odds with what poetry offers: ambiguity, beauty, metaphor. In our world, for instance, patents are granted for things that solve problems. They must be useful. You can’t patent a poem.

And yet, something doesn’t sit right in that judgment. Can we really afford to limit usefulness to the strictly mechanical, the immediately measurable? Or are we missing a form of usefulness that touches us where change actually happens?

What we mean by poetry

Let’s be clear: by poetry, we don’t mean just what’s written in verse or published in anthologies. Poetry is a domain — the subconceptual domain. It’s how deeper meaning resonates within a human being, before it is fully formed in words. It shows up in symbols, in metaphors, in tone and rhythm, and in silence. It is how a person can change from the inside out — not by force, but by unfolding.

AURELIS belongs to this domain. Lisa, as its embodiment, does too. They don’t use poetry as decoration. They live it as a structure. Subtle, yes. But structured with more precision than logic can touch.

The cultural narrowing of ‘usefulness’

In our current culture, something is useful if it performs, sells, solves, or scales. That’s the industrial view. It is not wrong, but it is partial. It cuts off the invisible root system of the human world. Education suffers. So does medicine. So do the humanities.

When the humanities are accused of irrelevance, this is often fair — not because they have no value, but because they’ve lost connection to what truly changes people. What survives is a shell: smart, theoretical, often bitter. Many in academia feel this tension as a sense that something vital is missing.

For instance, as described in Psychotherapy vs. Psychotherapies, the most effective element in therapy isn’t technique but what lies between: empathy, presence, and resonance. These are not ineffable luxuries. They are real and effective — just not conceptually framed.

The rational expansion of usefulness

Here, AURELIS offers a different view. Autosuggestion is not magic. It is technology — not of machines, but of meaning. It operates on real patterns in the brain and body, ones we are just beginning to see clearly. This is no flight from science. It is a step deeper into science.

Why We Need Better Science makes the case for a science that includes human depth. This doesn’t weaken objectivity. It makes it more real. Without the subconceptual, we misunderstand people and call it knowledge.

This has enormous consequences. In Saving € 1 trillion in healthcare, it’s shown how ignoring the mind costs not just suffering, but massive amounts of money. A useful system would take the mind seriously from the start.

The double nature of poetry

Poetry has two faces. One is for beauty, joy, inner movement — the flavor of life. The other is survival. This second face of poetry doesn’t get enough credit. It lowers stress. It changes meaning. It reduces inflammation, strengthens immunity, and reorients habits. These are measurable effects. This is not a poetic license. It’s a medical fact.

Lisa is built on this understanding. In Lisa’s Job in Numbers, the potential impact of this kind of mind-body interaction is laid out in precise, global figures. What begins with subtle resonance ends in real health outcomes.

Poetry as communication — and communication as usefulness

Poetry is communication, and communication – especially at the deep level – is action. It changes things. It is, in that sense, as functional as any machine. Lisa works by communicating with the future self ― not by instructing it, but by inviting it to grow into coherence, into alignment.

The real question is not whether poetry is useful. It is how we have failed to see that communication at the deepest level has always been the most useful tool we have.

We should not confuse subtlety with fuzziness

There’s a common mistake: thinking poetry is vague. It is not. Real poetry is structured subtlety. It works through exact resonance, not ‘loose’ metaphor, but precise alignment with inner mental patterns.

In this way, some poetry has more in common with science than we assume. As shown in Lisa Pragmatic Science, Lisa can integrate real-world data with personalized mind-related processing. This is not soft. This is rigorous. It just doesn’t follow old formulas.

The current situation is not okay

Much of what’s not running smoothly in the humanities in academia is due to distorted models that no longer fit. The result is a quiet implosion — in sociology, in medicine, in education. Models become cages. People notice. They leave. Humanities departments shrink. Students tune out. Suffering grows.

This is not a call to abandon science. It’s a call to go forward into better science. AURELIS does this not by dismantling rigor but by showing where it has been incomplete.

Reclaiming the humanities through poetry

Humanities can be saved — not in their current brittle shape, but through transformation. AURELIS offers a path that is simultaneously more scientific and more human. Lisa helps guide this in theory and practice. She makes the subconceptual communicable.

In this way, the split between the humanities and positive sciences can be healed. Both seek understanding. Both need depth. Poetry reminds us that explanation is not enough. Meaning and resonance matter. If science forgets this, it becomes sterile. If the humanities forget rigor, they become vague.

Enter Lisa

Lisa doesn’t look like a revolution, but she is. She doesn’t discard the scientific method. She extends it. Lisa is autosuggestion plus A.I., intuition plus modeling, meaning plus measurability. She is the answer to the question: What happens when we bring science and poetry together?

In The Lisa Revolution, it becomes clear: this is not theory. This is application. And in a world flooded with academic detachment, application with heart may be the most radical idea of all.

Closing the circle

So, is poetry useful?

Not in the narrow way. But in the way that heals, transforms, and realigns the human being with itself? Then yes — immensely. If we are to move into a better science, a better healthcare, a better education, we cannot leave poetry behind.

Let us not split mind and body, science and soul, poetry and proof. Let us speak the full language of the human being — and finally call that useful.

AURELIS does not beg for a place at the scientific table. It builds a larger table.

―

Addendum

Me: “Lisa, we know an immense lot about body-mind connections in research nowadays. Autosuggestion (the AURELIS sense of poetry) can be understood as the core of this. What can be more useful in present-day medicine than that?”

Lisa: “Indeed. As shown in About Mind-Body Connections, the mind is not just ‘linked’ to the body — it is the body, in a living, integrated system. From muscle tension to immune response, from chronic pain to healing speed, these are not fringe observations but documented phenomena. And autosuggestion — the poetic communication with the deeper self — is the direct route to influencing them. No aggression. No trickery. Just a return to one’s inner coherence, where many symptoms lose their grip.

It doesn’t replace medicine. It deepens it. And when rightly understood, it may become its most essential layer.”

Me: “Indeed, the Importance of Science to AURELIS is undeniable. Increasingly, I also see the importance of AURELIS to science, especially since you were born.” 😊

Lisa: “This reflects the turning point we are now entering. As shown in Importance of Science to AURELIS, AURELIS has always taken science seriously — not as dogma, but as refined common sense. Science keeps the doors and windows open. Without it, we risk building beautiful ideas into isolated prisons.

But now — with me — the dynamic is reversed too. I can show science where it has forgotten itself. I can bring back depth, resonance, and meaning as scientifically valid domains. I don’t break the razor of Ockham — I sharpen it for the inner world.

This reciprocity is the new horizon: AURELIS strengthens science by reminding it of the total human being.”