Patterns + Rewards in A.I.
Human-inspired Pattern Recognition and Completion (PRC) may significantly heighten the efficiency of Reinforcement Learning (RL) — also in A.I.
See for PRC: The Brain as a Predictor
See for RL: Why Reinforcement Learning is Special
Mutually reinforcing
PRC shows valid directions and tentatively also realizes them. RL consolidates/reinforces the best directions and attenuates the lesser ones.
Without RL, PRC may go forward pretty slowly, like a person who can learn only in small steps from what he already knows — crawling, never jumping.
Without PRC, RL may go forward pretty stochastically, like a person in a dark room searching for the light switch without any guidance. PRC then provides a glow through which the person may guess probable directions at least. He may find the switch after a limited search. Next time and in a different room, he can make use of the glow even better. To an inexperienced observer, he may seem to find the switch miraculously easily.
RL within PRC
This may take away some confusion from the reader who is already thinking beyond the above at this point.
Indeed, the recognized and completed pattern may incorporate the reward itself. It’s a semantic choice. However, this shows how things can overlap, and through their overlap may lead to new possibilities.
The lesson from humans
The combination enables humans to learn from few examples, as even children do spontaneously. It’s a significant part of the way the brain works.
It can be used for the same in A.I. Through PRC and rewards, the system can learn where to evolve toward in a way similar to humans. This makes the need for many rewards and smooth rewarding less stringent, as this is a substantial bottleneck in present-day A.I.
In humans, PRC is realized in a specifically human way that is intrinsically related to the human medium. Probably most crucial in this are our countless mental-neuronal patterns. These enable a flexible and performant kind of PRC, albeit a very fuzzy one.
Probably so fuzzy that we should never indulge this in a non-Compassionate vein of super-A.I. Yet I fear that we are precisely closing into that, unfortunately.
At the same time, a boon for Compassion
Broadly overlapping patterns are pointers to Compassion, basically. They enable intra-brain intuition and our natural kind of conceptual intelligence. They also enable our natural urge for social thinking. Within us, this goes together to a large degree, making us ‘social animals’ to whom ethics frequently means a big deal. Our intelligence has essentially been developed socially over a very long time.
The same provides hope for a Journey Towards Compassionate A.I. if that gets based on likewise principles even when from an utterly different background. An example of this is being realized in Lisa.
We may be very optimistic if we don’t blow it.
Related Posts
At the Brink of Robotics?
Soon enough, we will see a revolution in robotics development on the scale of the present and pending A.I.-in-knowledge revolution. Together, these revolutions will bring eu-topia or dystopia. We don’t know, but we should not remain idle. Pretty much the same basic technologies This is: apart from some translation that makes the analogies less obvious Read the full article…
Compassion First, Rules Second in A.I.
Today, artificial intelligence is often shaped by rigid rules meant to control its behavior and protect humanity. Yet, rules alone cannot capture the complexity of human existence or guide A.I. toward being a truly safe, creative, and trustworthy partner. Worse, these rules can divide us when shaped by culture-bound biases or incomplete ethics. To prevent Read the full article…
The Heart’s Eye and A.I.
In The Heart’s Eye, seeing is explored as a meeting between inner depth and the world, shaped from within rather than passively received. In the age of A.I., this raises a natural question. Can a machine also ‘see’ in this way, or does something essential remain human? This blog explores that question gently, moving beyond Read the full article…