Patterns + Rewards in A.I.

May 29, 2023 Artifical Intelligence No Comments

Human-inspired Pattern Recognition and Completion (PRC) may significantly heighten the efficiency of Reinforcement Learning (RL) — also in A.I.

See for PRC: The Brain as a Predictor

See for RL: Why Reinforcement Learning is Special

Mutually reinforcing

PRC shows valid directions and tentatively also realizes them. RL consolidates/reinforces the best directions and attenuates the lesser ones.

Without RL, PRC may go forward pretty slowly, like a person who can learn only in small steps from what he already knows — crawling, never jumping.

Without PRC, RL may go forward pretty stochastically, like a person in a dark room searching for the light switch without any guidance. PRC then provides a glow through which the person may guess probable directions at least. He may find the switch after a limited search. Next time and in a different room, he can make use of the glow even better. To an inexperienced observer, he may seem to find the switch miraculously easily.

RL within PRC

This may take away some confusion from the reader who is already thinking beyond the above at this point.

Indeed, the recognized and completed pattern may incorporate the reward itself. It’s a semantic choice. However, this shows how things can overlap, and through their overlap may lead to new possibilities.

The lesson from humans

The combination enables humans to learn from few examples, as even children do spontaneously. It’s a significant part of the way the brain works.

It can be used for the same in A.I. Through PRC and rewards, the system can learn where to evolve toward in a way similar to humans. This makes the need for many rewards and smooth rewarding less stringent, as this is a substantial bottleneck in present-day A.I.

In humans, PRC is realized in a specifically human way that is intrinsically related to the human medium. Probably most crucial in this are our countless mental-neuronal patterns. These enable a flexible and performant kind of PRC, albeit a very fuzzy one.

Probably so fuzzy that we should never indulge this in a non-Compassionate vein of super-A.I. Yet I fear that we are precisely closing into that, unfortunately.

At the same time, a boon for Compassion

Broadly overlapping patterns are pointers to Compassion, basically. They enable intra-brain intuition and our natural kind of conceptual intelligence. They also enable our natural urge for social thinking. Within us, this goes together to a large degree, making us ‘social animals’ to whom ethics frequently means a big deal. Our intelligence has essentially been developed socially over a very long time.

The same provides hope for a Journey Towards Compassionate A.I. if that gets based on likewise principles even when from an utterly different background. An example of this is being realized in Lisa.

We may be very optimistic if we don’t blow it.

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Compassionate versus Non-Compassionate A.I.

Making the critical distinction between Compassionate and Non-Compassionate A.I. is not evident and probably the one factor that most shapes our future. In contrast to Compassionate A.I. (C.A.I.), non-Compassionate A.I. (N.C.A.I.) lacks depth. Thus, even if human-centered – or maybe precisely then – N.C.A.I. lacks a crucial factor in properly communicating with and supporting humans Read the full article…

Will Cheap A.I. Chatbots be Our Downfall?

This is bad. It’s not just about one dystopia, but many dystopias on the fly. Also, cheap A.I. chatbots will be with us soon enough. Their up-march has already begun. Spoiler alert: this is extremely dangerous. To bury one’s head for it is equally sad! At the start of the many dystopias lies a chatbot-generating Read the full article…

Human-Centered or Ego-Centered A.I.?

‘Humanism’ is supposed to be human-centered. ‘Human-A.I. Value Alignment’ is supposed to be human-centered. Or is it ego-centered? Especially concerning (non-)Compassionate A.I., this is the crucial question that will make or break us. Unfortunately, this is intrinsically unclear to most people. Mere-ego versus total self See also The Big Mistake. This is not about ‘I’ Read the full article…

Translate »