No to Wokism, Yes to Gentleness

June 26, 2022 Sociocultural Issues No Comments

In another blog, I define wokism as woke fundamentalism, being an abuse of wokeness as a positive striving to fully respect and tolerate people of many different kinds.

I am very woke, but not at all a wokist.

Woke should be gentle.

Without gentleness, woke tends to fall into the opposite, being intolerance. Woke is about active tolerance.

With gentleness – very different from weakness – woke is necessary for a good society. In my view, woke people should therefore pay utmost attention to being gentle ― a quality emerging from the inside.

Difference not made

I have the impression that the difference between wokeness and wokism is seldom made. Tossing both in the same bin provides no room for gentleness ― wokeness being denigrated for what it isn’t.

With gentleness, wokeness can best be seen as the more socially active part of gentleness itself. In a gentle society, wokeness is a matter of fact.

So, where has gentleness gone in many parts of society?

I think it has gone down the drain of anxiety. Also, many ‘isms’ (fundamentalisms) result from anxiety, being an inner happening with many outward projections.

In this view, apparent opposites come together.

For instance, wokism and anti-wokism

Both are opposites of awakened wokism. The only difference lies in the object of their agency. Both act out of fear for what appears ‘alien’ to what they hold on to be themselves. They project in different ways, but they project nevertheless. From a distance, the difference is unimportant.

Both lack gentleness.

“Let he who is without sin throw the first stone.”

This line from the Catholic New Testament [John 8:7] is not understood by either. Jesus didn’t mean that crooks need to go free, but that we are all, in the first place, human beings who need to be treated with much gentleness. Jesus was indeed himself a very gentle person ― most of the time. He may have been the wokist person ever setting foot on earth, whether in a story or reality.

In this vein, I say yes to gentleness, no to wokism.

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Philosophical Modernism’s Self-Destruction

Philosophical modernism, emerging prominently in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, sought to challenge and redefine previous intellectual traditions. While it produced valuable progress in art, literature, and thought, its focus on rationality and surface-level analysis often came at the expense of depth. This imbalance eventually led to its decline and self-destruction. This blog Read the full article…

Lisa’s Essential Changes

Essential changes are so fundamental that they trigger unforeseen secondary changes that are also essential. One can see a chain of changes in which Lisa takes part, impacting multiple domains with profound transformative power in each. This blog presents several examples. Central to this is the ability to spread Compassion widely as a catalyst across Read the full article…

Costly Ego

Mere-ego is by far the most costly thing on Earth: annually, trillions of Euros, millions of human lives, and an unfathomable lot of human suffering through disease, war, and other mishaps. Moreover, it possibly leads to the end of the human species soon enough. See: The Story of Ego Unfortunately, this is no exaggeration. Also, Read the full article…

Translate »