No to Wokism, Yes to Gentleness
In another blog, I define wokism as woke fundamentalism, being an abuse of wokeness as a positive striving to fully respect and tolerate people of many different kinds.
I am very woke, but not at all a wokist.
Woke should be gentle.
Without gentleness, woke tends to fall into the opposite, being intolerance. Woke is about active tolerance.
With gentleness – very different from weakness – woke is necessary for a good society. In my view, woke people should therefore pay utmost attention to being gentle ― a quality emerging from the inside.
Difference not made
I have the impression that the difference between wokeness and wokism is seldom made. Tossing both in the same bin provides no room for gentleness ― wokeness being denigrated for what it isn’t.
With gentleness, wokeness can best be seen as the more socially active part of gentleness itself. In a gentle society, wokeness is a matter of fact.
So, where has gentleness gone in many parts of society?
I think it has gone down the drain of anxiety. Also, many ‘isms’ (fundamentalisms) result from anxiety, being an inner happening with many outward projections.
In this view, apparent opposites come together.
For instance, wokism and anti-wokism
Both are opposites of awakened wokism. The only difference lies in the object of their agency. Both act out of fear for what appears ‘alien’ to what they hold on to be themselves. They project in different ways, but they project nevertheless. From a distance, the difference is unimportant.
Both lack gentleness.
“Let he who is without sin throw the first stone.”
This line from the Catholic New Testament [John 8:7] is not understood by either. Jesus didn’t mean that crooks need to go free, but that we are all, in the first place, human beings who need to be treated with much gentleness. Jesus was indeed himself a very gentle person ― most of the time. He may have been the wokist person ever setting foot on earth, whether in a story or reality.
In this vein, I say yes to gentleness, no to wokism.
Related Posts
The Dark Side of Democracy
Democracy, in its ideal form, is a system where people govern themselves, where freedom and fairness reign, and where society progresses through collective wisdom. But just as the moon has a dark side, so does democracy. The danger lies in an inner dissociation within individuals and society itself. Much like a living organism, democracy needs Read the full article…
Divide and Conquer or Unite and Flow
From ancient times, ‘divide and conquer’ has been the foundation of power dynamics, shaping empires and political strategies. The idea is straightforward: exploit divisions to maintain control. While effective in the short term, this strategy often leads to instability and eventual collapse. In contrast, ‘unite and flow’ offers a compelling alternative — one that fosters Read the full article…
A ‘Good Society’ Strives for Inner Freedom
This blog continues the reflections from Autonomy vs. Inner Freedom — a conversation between Lisa and me about the deep implications of these concepts for both humanity and super-A.I. If you haven’t read it yet, I warmly recommend doing so first. In that dialogue, we explored how Inner Freedom is more than autonomy — it Read the full article…