Social Media versus Irony

August 31, 2020 Sociocultural Issues No Comments

It’s actually, nowadays, rather the world versus irony.

(q&d = quick and dirty)

Quite disturbing

A culture without real irony is like a symbolic plant without water. Such can only survive by turning itself into cardboard. I don’t call that ‘surviving’ at all.

A culture that shoves irony under the carpet tends to indulge in a kind of pretentious mega-irony upon some flying carpet, trying to replace quality with cheap quantity. This is then brought to an audience that, one way or another, pays for this entertainment.

Or is it undertainment?

Real irony isn’t cheap. It demands something from the user. The aim is not a quick laugh . and . let’s quickly go to the next show for we have an attention span of what?

Nothing, please. Keep your q&d humor.

More and more, social media companies also strive for political correctness. Their endeavors expunge irony.

That’s as sad as it is understandable. The latter has to do with the sheer volume. There is so much stuff posted that no organization can put enough amount in reading it all in search of offensive content. So, it is processed either automatically or quickly looked at by humans.

But irony is notoriously challenging to get. That’s why it’s irony, of course. It needs to have associations that are more than q&d.

Irony is more than worthwhile!

It brings a more profound understanding in a specific way. It invites people to think. It points to what is taken for granted while showing that this shouldn’t be taken for granted. Irony orients to deeper layers. Take this out, and you have a cardboard society.

A not worthwhile society, comfortably numb and boring.

So, should we accept occasional disrespect disguised as irony in order to accept occasional irony misinterpreted as disrespect?

In any case, even if something is interpreted by many people – or a whole culture – as disrespect, that is still no guarantee that it’s not irony. Taking this out would diminish both cultures since a culture that has no use for irony at all has no place for depth.

I don’t see any place on this planet for such a culture.

No exception for social media

A social media culture with no place for irony is as flat as a smartphone screen. It’s as superficial as a whizz beyond another dozen posts, as analphabetic as what regards anything but the most simple ideas.

There is morality in intellectual effort. It keeps people from getting enslaved by the most single-minded manipulator with two thumbs, of which there may be more and more in the running if we don’t… think.

Irony is thinking, exploring, discovering

ever new layers and associations. In other words: it’s something that lives.

It entices. It challenges. It seduces. It suggests. It turns upside down, inside out. It lets you discover who you are. It makes you alive in ways you didn’t know before.

Since social media have a huge influence on many, irony is a necessary asset.

We are losing it on a daily basis.

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

To Progress ≠ to Destruct ― To Conserve ≠ to Cling to

Progress and conservation are often seen as opposites, but in truth, they belong together. Progress without conservation destroys what is meaningful, while conservation without progress suffocates. This blog explores how both are facets of the same deeper movement, drawing on perennial wisdom, neuroscience, Compassion, and urgent global needs. The real challenge is not choosing between Read the full article…

Sleepwalking from World Crisis to World Crisis

The global crises that we are experiencing one after another – or even simultaneously – do not happen by coincidence. In-depth, their common cause is a fundamentally wrong view of the deep-mental side of the human being. Ancient wisdom and cutting-edge science have been trying to wake up humanity ― until now, in vain. Even Read the full article…

Object-Science Versus Subject-Science

Science about objects: physics, chemistry… Science about subjects: psychology, history… Both sciences are different and important. Alpha, beta, positive etc. Let’s skip that and simply talk about object- versus subject-science. This is related to, respectively, closed-world versus open-world phenomena. Explanatory analogy: A cloud (‘open world’ with lots of possible influences in all directions) doesn’t fit Read the full article…

Translate »