Equality?
Everybody knows we live in a world of huge inequality. Indeed. But inequality in what? Where lies importance? Thus, in what should we strive for more equality?
In money?
Thus: in the currency that can be traded for any other ‘goods’: a car, a house, even a wife in (many men’s) imagination?
A strict focus on money would make an urge for ‘equality’ also a surge for objectified materialism. Even ‘the other wife’ becomes objectified, materialism-ated.
Is that OK to you?
Not to me. At one time, it struck me deeply when working as a doctor for less money-privileged patients. Then at times of election, huge numbers just voted for own money and against other people, principles, anything… Money makes the world go around till everything stops, doesn’t it.
So, striving for monetized equality?
Sure, with realistic moderation.
An already more to-the-point general currency: status.
In a world where money = status, the difference is not obvious. One ‘does it’ without thinking: the person with money can ‘boss around’ the person without. If this ‘bossing around’ is not done, it’s felt as a gift.
Which then again is OK! It’s nice to give and it’s nice to receive. A real gift is given wholeheartedly. It’s a person giving a piece of himself to another person.
A real gift is not a deal, in any way.
Equal-worthiness
In my view, equality should be about status indeed. Not the one that is money or -related status, but the one that is related to ‘human (end) value’. [see: ‘Being of Value’]
We all deserve that status, although this is obviously not easy to achieve in vivo… Best is to start giving it to yourself. Paradoxically, this is of course the only way to achieve real status and yet it’s also the ‘most difficult way’ unless one is in the game of self-deception.
Different people, different statuses
Again, so obvious.
And yet people massively turn the other way.
Deep down, we – probably naturally – manage status as for instance the thing needed for erotic success. It’s as if we (humans) just cannot help it. We need status to have a workable environment that looks more or less like the present.
Then, we could change environment.
In the future, we will, as we have done in the past.
Should we then strive for an environment prone to utmost equality?
Which equality?
Equal-worthiness would probably be most correct, but very fuzzy.
Or: we might ‘forget’ equality altogether. See where that leads to… In my view, we should then all the more strive for worthiness and happiness, such things, in which then again money and status may play their roles, not in an urge for equality but for end-result…
Eventually, people should be able to make their own self-worthiness
but they (we) definitely need a lot of support in this.
Related Posts
The Cultural Tipping Point
Something is shifting beneath the surface of many societies. Fragmentation intensifies in public arenas, yet in private conversations a quieter longing can be heard. Many feel tired of outrage, suspicious of simplifications, and hungry for something more substantial. This blog explores a possibility: that such tension may not only signal decline, but a pre-threshold phase Read the full article…
A Divided World Will be Conquered by A.I.
Seriously. People fighting each other at a geopolitical level will, through competition and strife, build a world in which A.I. follows suit. There is no doubt about this: IF… THEN. As I write in my book ‘The Journey towards Compassionate A.I.,’ we are entitled to be anxious about A.I. – the real one, soon to Read the full article…
The Dark Side of Democracy
Democracy, in its ideal form, is a system where people govern themselves, where freedom and fairness reign, and where society progresses through collective wisdom. But just as the moon has a dark side, so does democracy. The danger lies in an inner dissociation within individuals and society itself. Much like a living organism, democracy needs Read the full article…