Is Meditation Selfish?

January 29, 2022 Meditation No Comments

Meditation is the opposite of ego-selfishness. Even more, they are incompatible.

Theravada, Mahayana

These are the two biggest strands in worldwide Buddhism.

Mahayana may have been mainly developed historically as a reaction to what people saw as the Theravada monk’s ‘selfish’ attitude: the arhat who meditates especially to reach Nirvana for himself. Of course, this is by far no complete picture. Nevertheless, the Mahayana monk’s ideal was the state of Boddhisatva as an explicit goal beyond that of the arhat.

The Bodhisattva is, in this respect, the one on the way towards Nirvana or Buddhahood with one caveat: He vows not to attain it before – perhaps while doing so – reaching enlightenment for all ‘sentient beings.’

That’s the straight line towards Compassion.

Here and now

An instruction towards meditation may be to try being present in the ‘here and now,’ with concentration on the own body, moment after moment. Are you sitting straight? Hands in the correct position?

Are your thoughts not wandering or disturbing the here and now?

Mere-ego may be sitting in the here and now.

Moreover, mere-ego may find in a strict meditation scheme over an hour or several days an environment in which to oppose anything other than itself.

Some related rules and rituals, all in the here and now, may be used to manipulate the self. In this vein, nothing happens but ego-wise well-being in the safety of a mental prison.

It happens. The opposite also happens, and that is where meditation lies.

Here and now: nowhere, never

Ego has a harder time living in the ‘nowhere, never,’ especially when this is present in the here and now itself. Does that seem challenging to grasp?

Good.

This is not a riddle nor a trick towards non-conceptuality like some Zen-koan if used that way.

It is a way of being during meditation. Therefore, of course, it is meditation. ‘Nowhere, never’ lies emptiness as a source of potentiality, an openness of mind that can encounter concepts and non-concepts alike and go forward. Did I ever say meditation is easy?

Meditation surely is not straightforwardly ego-easy.

And there is no reason it should be ― straightforwardly. Meditation is not ego-selfish, but total-selfish.

When grasping the latter, one can see that the former forms part of it but with a very different countenance than in a state of inner dissociation (from it).

Many different things are called meditation.

The thing that I call meditation is warm and friendly.

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Two Faces of Meditation

One face is of the ‘I’ that meditates. The other is of the meditation doing itself. Both are OKAY. Both together are even more OKAY. This is not only about formal meditation. Formal meditation – on a cushion, if you like – is part and parcel and also just a tool for more of the Read the full article…

Samadhi

Samadhi is a state of deep and pure meditation — no concrete focus, no counting of breaths. Just being, more specifically, being alive. From being the thinker of thoughts to thinking the thinker. Frequently, there is a sense of unity or unification. Pure thinking In samadhi, there is a thinking and a thinker, but the Read the full article…

‘Being Ready’ in Meditation

Ready to end it. Ready to fall inside yourself. Ready to ‘go to the other shore.’ The feeling of being ready may lift you out of yourself. You’re sitting in lotus or just on a chair. Equally OK. Even so, you are ready to go and sit in lotus if that would be possible for Read the full article…

Translate »