A Scheme of Human Mind

June 21, 2024 Cognitive Insights No Comments

This blog focuses on an abstract scheme of the human mind, illustrating the relationship between the conceptual and subconceptual domains of mental processing over time.

Abstract as it is, this explains many human affairs — positive and negative.

Half the scheme

The horizontal line indicates time.

The scheme is simple. Each of us experiences a continuous stream of consciousness, transitioning from thought to thought, feeling or decision, forming an unbroken narrative from birth to death. This unbroken narrative shapes our identity and perception of reality, influencing how we interact with the world and ourselves.

The prevalent idea in daily life

This accords with the above scheme.

Many people live their entire lives believing the Cartesian view that the human mind is composed solely of what lies above the line. It’s as if one conscious idea directly engenders the next, furthermore influenced by the environment but not by anything mind-related coming from under the line.

You “either know or don’t know.”

But there is no truth in this

The other half of the scheme

Neurocognitive science reveals that our initial scheme represents only a portion of the human mind.

Most of the meaningful stuff that happens in the brain (keeping things simple) occurs beneath the horizon line in a domain that I call the subconceptual. As the name suggests, there are no fully developed concepts here—only neurons forming patterns (mental-neuronal patterns, MNPs) that create patterns of patterns.

We have a continuous flow of non-conscious processing, which drives the evolution of our thoughts and feelings over time.

Note that, of course, there are continua everywhere.

For instance, we humans have no tails but we have tailbones, causing problems to some.

Likewise, conceptual thinking is no black-or-white business.

The entire scheme

The second scheme resembles non-human animals more closely, as they struggle to work with concepts in their minds. This distinction underscores the unique human capacity for abstract thinking and complex problem-solving.

Combining both schemes, we achieve a complete picture, where the ‘motor’ functions beneath the line operate invisibly at a conceptual level. This is, we can intuitively feel that things are going on beneath the line but not conceptually grasp them as such. We can only abstractly describe the process as I’m doing now.

So, what happens in the human mind/brain

Many MNPs remain mostly inactive, with only a limited number becoming active at any given moment. Only a few of these are active enough to rise above the (abstract!) line and can be consciously experienced in conceptual guise, as shown in the scheme.

Most of what meaningfully happens beneath the line doesn’t reach conscious awareness, even though this influences anything that eventually does reach consciousness.

Consequently, we are predominantly driven by non-conscious processes.

Subconceptual Drives Conceptual

Yet, we continually work, play, and live as if non-conceptual processing – meanwhile guiding decisions without conscious awareness – does not exist. This is our basic cognitive illusion.

Recognizing and embracing this illusion can lead to greater self-awareness and a deeper understanding of our motivations and behaviors. It’s an Oriental kind of ‘Enlightenment’ that seems simple in the scheme. However, it makes all the difference in the world in every mind-related domain.

This applies, of course, to every domain in the human world, including healthcare as described in my book Your Mind as Cure.

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Flower Power vs. Uniform Power

We may need both ― without exaggeration in any. Flowery power Each flower is different. Yet none grow into the ground. There is uniformity even in flowers. Nevertheless, many flowers in a field don’t take advantage of each other’s strength. One danger in being flowery is therefore that each flower is fragile and can easily Read the full article…

Vagueness of Mind

We live and think in fog. Our most cherished inner notions – like love, self, or meaning – resist precise definition, even though we rely on them every day. This isn’t a failure of thought. It’s something deeper. Vagueness isn’t a problem but rather a subtle language of the mind — something ancient, dynamic, and Read the full article…

Rationality Contra Human Depth

For many people, rationality stands opposite to human depth ― a profound misunderstanding. This includes many scientists ― or even especially the latter. Difference conceptual – subconceptual This is a more relevant distinction. If we put merely conceptual versus merely subconceptual, we can talk rightfully about opposites. Of course, nothing is entirely the one or Read the full article…

Translate »