72. The enemy!
Becoming successful is easy. You only have to be able to count to three: 1) Create an enemy; 2) Make yourself ‘needed’ to fight this enemy; 3) Simply go for it.
◊◊◊
It’s too bad that in all this, the word ‘simply’ is crucial. It means that people with a relevant level of intelligence have a big disadvantage. They don’t just ‘simply’ go for it with disregard to anything else. They think.
◊◊◊
Take medicine. Diseases are ‘the enemy’. Medicine is ‘needed’ to fight this enemy. 1, 2…3. Just like that. Does it matter whether diseases do not exist as natural-kind-phenomena, but only as conventions? Does it matter whether most of these conventions nowadays do not fit at all the concept of ‘enemy’ in any case because they are… the people themselves?
◊◊◊
Take world politics. The other side is ‘the enemy’. But who is the enemy? Well, the enemy is the other side of course. Rather circular. Be it communists or capitalists, terrorists, jewists, simply-not-my-religionists, simply-not-my-colorists, non-democratists, anti-democratists, pseudo-democratists, nuclear weaponists, alienists, I-do-not-know-anymore-but-will-find-something-ists, or etc. And lo! Some success-seeker is ‘needed’ to fight this enemy! 1, 2…3. Boring, isn’t it?
◊◊◊
Take cigarettes. Take juvenile delinquency. Take ‘the boss’. Take parents in some you-know-when stage of most children’s development… Take anything. The simplest ladder towards success is always very simple indeed. But seldom or never does it lead to human dignity, happiness, inner strength, growth of potential or anything positive. It leads to ego-power, but at the expense of human beings, including the ones with the heightened ego-power. In other words, it’s just not good.
◊◊◊
Or should I say: it’s bad?
◊◊◊
I think so, in many cases (except where it has a function as transitory stage). I really do. And I don’t mean it in a relative way (as ‘this’ being worse than ‘that’). I mean it in an absolute way: it is what badness is about. It’s the definition itself of badness. Someone/thing somewhere gave us humans the freedom of choice. That’s OK. Despite everything, I think we should always remain grateful for that. But it’s a choice with a sting. In order to be able to choose, an ‘ego’ is needed. Of course, this ego can choose to always choose for itself. And so, in many cases it does. And it chooses power. Ego-power. 1, 2…3.
◊◊◊
Fighting the ego is no solution. In fact, it would come down to the same thing. The ego is not ‘the enemy’, except that of an ego. In a number of cases, both are even the same ego. Then what is the solution?
◊◊◊
I think the solution is a flower.
◊◊◊
I used this image before. The ego is the top of the flower bud. If the flower opens, the top of the bud doesn’t disappear, but ‘transcends’ into a beautiful whole. However, if the bud is too sticky, the flower never opens and rots in the bud.
◊◊◊
That’s quite a choice, isn’t it?
◊◊◊
Related Posts
71. The eye of the needle
Experimental scientists want to ‘prove’ the effect of acupuncture by using their experimental scientists’ schemes. What has come out of the experimentation with acupuncture is that it works… sometimes. ◊◊◊ Even so, if one doesn’t care exactly what works, then the case seems to be in favor of the needlers… sometimes. However, if one goes Read the full article…
33. Are you going to San Francisco?
Flower power has been. People of my generation were born just too late to be its children at that time. That’s not fair, is it? So maybe it’s time for a new ‘flower power’ to hit this planet. Why not? And in order to accommodate me and my generation, and in fact any generation, let’s Read the full article…
15. The message in the bottle: homeopathy
Classic ‘pure’ homeopathy: one takes a number of drops of ‘messaged’ water and gets better. That’s what we are told and guess what, it’s true indeed. ◊◊◊ What is also true is that the person not only takes the water, but also ‘takes’ the expectation that this water will help him. Question: which of both Read the full article…