79. Sildenafil: more than a quack’s erection?

January 31, 2018 Sticky Thoughts No Comments

Sildenafil (known for instance as Viagra): who needs it? The real question is: does it work at all in physiologically enabling an erection?

◊◊◊

I don’t know. What I do know, is that nobody knows.

◊◊◊

Really. Nobody knows. Hasn’t it been tested then? Of course it has, but never properly! Let me explain. But beware, you may lose faith in more than only the blue pill.

◊◊◊

I’ve done a thorough literature search about this. I’ve looked at many hundreds of papers about how sildenafil has been tested. Amazingly, I have not found one proper paper that discusses the testing of sildenafil against an ‘active placebo’. This is crucial. In my view, there would even better be no testing at all than having this situation…

◊◊◊

In contrast to a passive placebo, an ‘active placebo’ is, as you may know, a placebo with side effects. In the best of worlds, these side effects even mimic as much as possible the side effects of the medication itself to which it is compared.

◊◊◊

So I found that sildenafil has only been tested against the proverbial ‘sugar pill’. OK. Give me the sugar pill. What does my body feel? Nothing of course. Then give me an active placebo. This is the placebo-with-lots-of-side-effects. What does my body feel? Certainly a lot. Does it make a difference? You bet!

◊◊◊

Namely, if I expect that the pill works on my masculinity, then in the second case chances are much higher that I will feel a placebo-effect (the family jewels becoming bigger). This is because the deep expectation of my ‘body & soul’ will be much higher than in the first case. Tremendously much higher, especially if the side effects (as in the case of sildenafil) are cardiovascular and mimic for a great deal the effects of sexual arousal.

◊◊◊

Concisely put: a study that compares sildenafil to a passive placebo and shows a positive result for sildenafil, gives no clue as to what is the cause of this result: pharmacology or psychology.

◊◊◊

So: does sildenafil work? I don’t know. Nobody knows. Does anyone care to properly investigate it in the end? I am. My main argument is that it’s of the utmost importance to be ‘true’, especially in the case of sexuality. Then of course there are also the physical costs of the side effects, the dangers, the economic costs…

◊◊◊

But the main argument: truthfulness. This is not abstract, let alone superficial. It goes deep down into body and mind. It cannot be more concrete. It is you! It’s about your deepest and concrete feelings. It’s about your deepest and concrete relationship and wellness. It’s, very concretely, about your very soul. Can anything be more important?

◊◊◊

Actually, sildenafil is just an example. The medical truth is: there are many medications of which we don’t really know at all how effective is their pharmacology. The future will look back on the present age and see us as the ignorant beings that we are.

◊◊◊

Sometimes I really do want to escape to the future…

◊◊◊

Please follow and like us:
LinkedIn
Facebook
Facebook
Twitter
Google+
RSS
Follow by Email
SHARE

Related Posts

44. Puberty: the time for respect

Children in their puberty ask (in many cases very loudly) for respect, although they can have a huge difficulty in giving it themselves. The voice of protest is never far away… and I think they are essentially right. I also think that to become a grown-up in a profound way means to keep one’s own Read the full article…

45. We all heal of cancer on a daily basis

In a simplistic view upon cancer, everything is very straightforward: there is a cell in your body that degenerates into a cancer cell and starts to multiply very quickly. Indeed, much more quickly than all its healthy sister cells. At first, this passes unnoticed of course but in due time, the growth is discernible and Read the full article…

55. Making medicine 80% cheaper? No problem

Health is money (and vice versa). At least, that seems to be the message if you read the world in a pharmaceutical company’s handbook. The problem is that money is to many people still a rather scarce commodity. In the US, 30% of personal bankruptcies are due to the out-of-own-pocket costs of medical care. In Read the full article…