The Problem of the Skeptic

July 26, 2018 Sociocultural Issues No Comments

Typically human to run into such kind of problem… Well, we’ll have to deal with it. Hm, by throwing it out of the window?

Let’s say you are a skeptic.

That means you are a person wishing to you use rationality to ‘think for yourself’, as Kant admonished us all to do in order to ‘emerge from a self-inflicted immaturity’ (his words, see: ‘Enlightenment, Kant, AURELIS, Growth’]).

Yes, we should!

So, all right, you are skeptic and then even more skeptic and near to 100% skeptic…

Very, very skeptic indeed. And that’s very, very good!

And then there is a problem. Sooner or later, you get skeptic about your skepticism itself. Let’s put it this way: you get skeptic (A) about your skepticism (B) itself.

(A) turns on (B), making (B) actually impossible when nearing to 100% skeptical (A).

This is the Problem of the Skeptic.

One ‘solution’ is to stop being skeptical right before you make ‘being skeptical’ itself impossible. You stop being skeptical because “otherwise you run into the impossibility to do anything good at all.

That seems to me like throwing the problem out of the window. Isn’t it?

Let’s say you are a magician.

And you ‘heal’ people, through for instance sticking iron things into them, or letting them drink some colored, plain water. Or even – who cares – some uncolored, plain water 😊. Whatever.

I’m very skeptical towards magicians. Most of them very much value money and/or status. Besides, they leave a huge trail of human misery, frequently within themselves and even more within others.

You see: placebo [see: ‘Placebo Is Not Good for You’].

Still, the aura is about ‘doing good’ and magicians – the ones that think one bit further than their wand – counter skepticism because “otherwise you run into the impossibility to do anything good at all.

Recognizable?

Back to the skeptical future.

It’s the only decent one. At present, unfortunately, we’re not there yet.

Skeptical (A) turns on skeptical (B). It seems like biting one’s tail and ending the trip. It seems like sawing through the branch of the tree on which one is sitting oneself, trying to enjoy the view meanwhile.

Hm. And then there is of course skeptical (C) that turns on skeptical (A) and prevents it from sawing. Hey, what’s happening?

It’s not a dead end. It’s a groove, one that gets deeper and deeper. No window.

Can we get out of this groove?

My years in AI have taught me that if there is an insoluble problem, one should try to broaden the problem domain. Is that applicable here?

I guess so. What we want to achieve, is a better world. Rationality (including skepticism) is of utmost importance in this. We now have a landscape and a groove in that landscape. Trying to stop things getting into this groove, is like building a dam. Soon you have a flooding and a loss of many beautiful sites in the landscape. No good.

I think it’s better to accept the groove.

This way, we can get to being 100% skeptical. No window needed.

One can never be too skeptical!

Just accept the groove. It’s there, together with many beautiful and interesting things. There is no need to keep sitting in the groove. There’s lots of other things we can do. For instance, we can use our 100% skepticism to stop all magicians and their woe…

and build a better world.

Please follow and like us:
LinkedIn
Facebook
Facebook
Twitter
Google+
RSS
Follow by Email
SHARE

Related Posts

The End of War

War is not inevitable. At some point in the future, there will be no war ever anymore. We can think about what is needed towards that. Let’s be reasonable. An argument against pacifism is that it leads aggressive opponents to seek their chances on war or economic invasion. Right. We don’t want that. Let’s be Read the full article…

44. Puberty: the time for respect

Children in their puberty ask (in many cases very loudly) for respect, although they can have a huge difficulty in giving it themselves. The voice of protest is never far away… and I think they are essentially right. I also think that to become a grown-up in a profound way means to keep one’s own Read the full article…

Object-Science Versus Subject-Science

Science about objects: physics, chemistry… Science about subjects: psychology, history… Both sciences are different and important. Alpha, beta, positive etc. Let’s skip that and simply talk about object- versus subject-science. This is related to, respectively, closed-world versus open-world phenomena. Explanatory analogy: A cloud (‘open world’ with lots of possible influences in all directions) doesn’t fit Read the full article…