Does Evil Exist?

January 15, 2024 Morality No Comments

Spoiler alert: It doesn’t — except within interpretation. There, in most cases, it’s mutual.

The one (individual, organization, people) seen as Evil doesn’t usually see himself as such. Instead, he sees the other as such.

‘Evil’ also as in geopolitics

The Axis of Evil, the war on terrorism, on drugs, or just any war… just take your pick.

Here, too, the ‘evil ones’ generally see themselves not as such. The evilness lies in the interpretations (and projections). This becomes more apparent when looking at the general picture from a UFO-view.

To be avoided is any simplistic interpretation.

This is, seen from an abstract viewpoint: we Good — they Evil.

The main problem is that simple interpretations attract many people through easy messages, whereby it doesn’t matter so much concretely what is good or evil.

Once you try to bring some complexity into this, you can encounter a surprising degree of inner resistance. Attempting to counter this usually only makes matters worse.

In this setting, friendliness is a risk.

A generally friendly attitude then becomes seen as a weakness, if not badness itself. Evil-seers are quite Manichean: things being white or black — if not easily good then bad.

If one acts friendly, then one is not altogether seen as being straightforwardly against badness — therefore, this may be seen as badness by itself.

Unfortunately, rampant inner dissociation makes this harsher.

In a bad case, ‘friendly’ thus even becomes a hallmark of what is to be avoided. What comes out of this is a whirlpool of more of the same dissociation, Eigenangst, and aggression or depression.

‘Us, the Good ones’ is in most cases an idea to be avoided.

The main reason for this is that it hinders the broad view.

Thus, from a narrow view, it can make people worse — much worse! We are talking here about indifference, discrimination, and war. We are talking about any addiction that lies about a promise of meaningful depth.

Precisely the narrow view hinders the broad view. Thus, countering it with itself only heightens it. Countering it with its opposite also only heightens it.

In short, ‘countering’ doesn’t work.

As written in other blogs, even if change doesn’t work, growth still does.

Even more, it has always been the only thing that works. One needs to ‘grow out of evil.’ Fortunately, that is very well possible. I hope the future will bring lots of that, from people’s childhood onward.

Huge challenge: Artificial Intelligence

This is probably the biggest challenge for humankind ever, in many ways: we versus it, it versus us, we versus ourselves in context of it, and – who knows, some time – it versus it.

There is an existential need for Compassionate A.I.

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Towards Universal Empathy

Universal empathy is a moral stance that may solve the in-group >< out-group problem. [‘further on ‘In-Group Creates Out-Group?’] “How numerous the living beings may be, I pledge to liberate (from suffering) them all.” This is one of four Buddhist ‘vows of the Bodhisattva.’ Not being an adept of Buddhism, I find in it a Read the full article…

Authority?

‘Authority’: a word that divides many, may bring many back together. Not as a matter of fact though. The situation and an appeal to some caution Authority can be seen as always personal. For example, the ‘authority of scripture’ is the authority of those who command scripture to be authoritative. To some, ‘authority’ is nothing Read the full article…

To Say that Abortion is Murder

is understandable. Human life is terminated by deliberate intervention. This is the definition of murder — as given by humans. The challenge rests in the phrase ‘by humans’ — highlighting it as a human construct. Recognizing this construct as human-made can open the door to more nuanced ethical discussions rather than assuming an absolute position. Read the full article…

Translate »