Is Short-Term Enough in Therapy?
This issue is relevant to any therapy. In my view, it is most pertinent to psychotherapy.
A clear and present tension
In psychotherapy, we may expect the quality being largely related to effect-longevity. To many people – as to me – a temporary feel-good is not what is expected from psychotherapy.
Contrast this with pharmacotherapy. A simple painkiller is not expected to have a long-lasting effect on the individual’s pain. It doesn’t carry that connotation at all.
Psychotherapy is expected to go further than the symptom. However, there is tension in this. Do most clients desire to be permanently and fundamentally changed?
Also, it is not generally what psychotherapeutic research measures. It is not what generally gets published as success rates. Indeed, that would be challenging in the real world due to so many confounders. It will be more feasible in the case of Lisa. [see: “Lisa“]
Or is short-term enough?
The best may be to ask the clients themselves as part of their therapy. Going deeper into this issue may help any client know himself better and clarify the goal(s) one has in life and related to specific symptoms.
Is the client willing to go quite deep into the message of the symptom(s)?
An effort towards feeling this is a ‘communication with the symptom.’ This is already communication with oneself in-depth if done well and with proper support. As you may know, in AURELIS-coaching, this is always important.
The client’s idea about this may change during the coaching.
If it changes in congruence with the person as an individual (total-person), then with due respect, freedom, depth, and trust, it’s a road to be taken. It is the professional responsibility of the coach to let this be a gentle process.
Care should also be taken of the client’s social environment, especially with changing goals.
If chosen for easiness, short-term is almost never enough.
(Never say never.)
Personal change should be growth-oriented. Thus, short-term is almost never enough.
In social context, there is social responsibility. Thus, short-term is almost never enough.
A search for merely cosmetics is itself an issue to be coached.
Short-term is almost never enough.
It’s about beauty.
It’s about ethics.
It’s about energy.
It’s about the other side of the world
and so much more.
The future.
Kindness.
The smile of an unknown child.
Related Posts
Ideomotor, Meditation, Coaching
Every true movement begins inside. From the smallest ideomotor impulse to the quiet depth of meditation and the shared resonance of coaching, all transformation follows the same direction — from inside out. In that movement lies both healing and understanding. Coaching, at its highest level, becomes not instruction but a meditative dialogue of meaning that Read the full article…
Problem -> Goal -> Cause -> Being There
Not all simple things are interesting, but all interesting things are easy to express in words. Such as: • What’s the problem? -> What’s the goal? • What is the deeper purpose? • What is the cause of this deeper purpose? Why do you want that? • Be there. In the case of superficial goals, it is not so interesting to Read the full article…
The AURELIS Coach in the Age of Lisa
AURELIS coaching is entering a new phase. Human coaches and Lisa are (soon enough) working side by side, each adding their own qualities to a shared purpose. This evolution keeps Compassion, congruence, and depth at the center while opening new ways for growth. The following reflections outline what this age means for coaches, coachees, and Read the full article…