Is Short-Term Enough in Therapy?
This issue is relevant to any therapy. In my view, it is most pertinent to psychotherapy.
A clear and present tension
In psychotherapy, we may expect the quality being largely related to effect-longevity. To many people – as to me – a temporary feel-good is not what is expected from psychotherapy.
Contrast this with pharmacotherapy. A simple painkiller is not expected to have a long-lasting effect on the individual’s pain. It doesn’t carry that connotation at all.
Psychotherapy is expected to go further than the symptom. However, there is tension in this. Do most clients desire to be permanently and fundamentally changed?
Also, it is not generally what psychotherapeutic research measures. It is not what generally gets published as success rates. Indeed, that would be challenging in the real world due to so many confounders. It will be more feasible in the case of Lisa. [see: “Lisa“]
Or is short-term enough?
The best may be to ask the clients themselves as part of their therapy. Going deeper into this issue may help any client know himself better and clarify the goal(s) one has in life and related to specific symptoms.
Is the client willing to go quite deep into the message of the symptom(s)?
An effort towards feeling this is a ‘communication with the symptom.’ This is already communication with oneself in-depth if done well and with proper support. As you may know, in AURELIS-coaching, this is always important.
The client’s idea about this may change during the coaching.
If it changes in congruence with the person as an individual (total-person), then with due respect, freedom, depth, and trust, it’s a road to be taken. It is the professional responsibility of the coach to let this be a gentle process.
Care should also be taken of the client’s social environment, especially with changing goals.
If chosen for easiness, short-term is almost never enough.
(Never say never.)
Personal change should be growth-oriented. Thus, short-term is almost never enough.
In social context, there is social responsibility. Thus, short-term is almost never enough.
A search for merely cosmetics is itself an issue to be coached.
Short-term is almost never enough.
It’s about beauty.
It’s about ethics.
It’s about energy.
It’s about the other side of the world
and so much more.
The future.
Kindness.
The smile of an unknown child.
Related Posts
Waiting at the Opening
Keep opening and waiting. ►►► AURELIS Coaching for Coaches (read this first) Suppose you know which insight can help the coachee move forward. OK. However, if that insight does not come from the coachee himself, it is practically non-existent for him/her, even if you bring it. Then it can be informative (for the coachee) but Read the full article…
Mental Patterns Change through Autosuggestion
This may even be the only way in which they can ethically and adequately change. There is a clear responsibility involved to do this as well as possible. Autosuggestion is the language that directly touches mental patterns. [see: “Patterns in Neurophysiology“] It is related to poetry in its metaphorical means, a meditative mental setting, and Read the full article…
The Delusional Coachee
With many coachees, some will inevitably carry with them a distorted sense of reality. At times, this distortion is mild or eccentric. Other times, it reaches the level of delusion — fixed beliefs that resist all evidence, often strange to outsiders but profoundly meaningful to the person. For Lisa, the challenge is not to categorize Read the full article…