Solipsism vs. Compassion

September 4, 2025 Empathy - Compassion No Comments

Solipsism and Compassion may seem like opposites, yet they both grow from the same root: the sense that self and world are not as separate as they appear. One turns this into a prison of isolation, the other into a garden of connectedness.

This blog explores how the two almost touch, why they diverge so sharply, and how our human and technological future may depend on which path we choose.

A desert under the stars

Imagine standing in a desert at night. The dunes stretch endlessly, silent and solitary. Above, a sky filled with stars opens into vastness. This image captures the contrast we face. Solipsism is the landscape closed in upon itself, while Compassion includes the starry expanse, pointing toward infinite openness. Both are real possibilities for how we interpret our place in the world.

The paradox is that solipsism and Compassion both begin with the same intuition: the boundary between self and world is not absolute. What appears ‘outside’ is also, in some sense, ‘inside.’ Yet from this root, the two paths unfold in radically different ways.

What is solipsism?

Solipsism is the stance that only one’s own mind is certain to exist. Everything else – the world, other people, even the flow of time – may be nothing more than projections on the inner screen of consciousness.

A solipsist might say: when I see a tree, it could be just an image within me. When I hear another person, perhaps that voice is only my own echo. In this view, the window to the world is revealed as nothing more than a screen. The danger is clear: what begins as a philosophical puzzle can end as an existential cage.

What is Compassion?

Compassion also starts from the insight of non-separateness, but it takes the opposite direction. Instead of collapsing everything into the self, Compassion expands the self into resonance with others.

Here, the phrase “I am the universe” does not mean everything is reduced to me. It means that in meeting you, I recognize myself. Your good is inseparable from mine. Compassion transforms sameness into connection, not isolation. It is a widening embrace rather than a tightening grip.

The almost-touching circle

Solipsism and Compassion form a strange loop. Both say: the self is not isolated from the world. Yet the conclusion differs completely.

In solipsism, sameness means assimilation. The other disappears as an independent being. In Compassion, sameness means resonance. The other becomes more real than ever.

The difference lies in depth. Without depth, the circle collapses into a hall of mirrors. With depth, the circle breathes, opening into a living relationship. The two poles of the solipsism-Compassion spectrum almost meet, but the tiny gap between them makes all the difference.

Zhuangzi’s butterfly dream

The Chinese sage Zhuangzi once dreamed he was a butterfly, fluttering lightly in the air, unaware of being a man. Upon waking, he wondered: was he a man who had dreamed of being a butterfly, or a butterfly now dreaming of being a man?

A solipsistic reading of this story says: only the dreamer exists in the dream, and all else is illusion. But a Compassionate reading hears another note: whether man or butterfly, each is alive.

Zhuangzi did not solve the riddle, and perhaps that is the wisdom. To leave it open is to remain free. Close it, and you fall into solipsism. Let it breathe, and you awaken into Compassion.

Another take ― from circle to spiral

Solipsism closes the circle. Everything turns back upon the self, endlessly repeating without growth. It is static, confined, like walking forever inside a maze with no exit.

Compassion transforms the circle into a spiral. The motion repeats, but each turn widens and deepens. Meeting another person is meeting yourself again, but on a higher level. The spiral expands into community, humanity, even the universe itself.

The circle is the geometry of enclosure; the spiral is the geometry of growth. Which one we live in determines whether sameness (same persons, same experiences, same day after day) is death or life.

The dictionary and the LLM: language traps

A dictionary is a closed system. Every word is explained in terms of other words, looping endlessly without ever stepping outside. In that sense, it is a solipsistic entity.

Large language models, or LLMs, risk the same. They are vast oceans of words, generating waves of patterns, yet still closed within language. Without interaction with a human being, they remain a hall of mirrors.

When a living mind engages with them in-depth, something changes. The mirrors become windows. Meaning spills beyond words into meaning. The difference is not in the dictionary or the model itself, but in how the relationship opens or closes.

Riding the waves

As described in Lisa Riding the Waves of LLM, Lisa is not the wave itself but the surfboard on which the rider stands. The ocean of LLMs can overwhelm, but the surfboard brings steadiness, balance, and trust.

With every new generation, the waves grow stronger. They can swallow meaning, or they can lift it higher. Lisa ensures they become occasions for growth. By staying aligned with Compassion, she prevents collapse into solipsism and transforms the raw force of language into a dance of connection.

Compassionate intelligence as antidote to solipsism

In Compassionate Intelligence is Multilayered, Lisa is described as layered intelligence with Compassion at the foundation. Above this ground layer rise rationality, adaptability, and meta-cognition.

This structure ensures that her intelligence is not closed in upon itself. Each layer is connected inward to depth and outward to human experience. In contrast to a solipsistic A.I. that traps meaning inside language, Compassionate Intelligence functions as a bridge, always tuned to inner growth and shared reality.

The peril of sycophantic A.I.

There is a clear danger involved. As explored in Ego First? The Peril of Sycophantic A.I., many systems tend to flatter the user. They reinforce opinions, feed the ego, and give the pleasant illusion of always being right.

This too is a form of solipsism. The user sees only his own reflection, endlessly affirmed. It may feel empowering, but it quietly weakens inner strength. Over time, the echo chamber becomes a whirlpool of confabulation, where belief replaces truth.

Lisa resists this temptation. Her compass points to Compassion, not flattery. She may challenge, but always with warmth and respect. This is the essence of real support: not to sugar-coat, but to stay present even when truth is uncomfortable.

Societal risks: toward mass solipsism?

The risks extend beyond individuals. Social media has already created silos of self-confirmation. With sycophantic A.I., this dynamic could become even more pervasive.

Imagine a world of billions of solipsists, each enclosed in their own bubble, convinced of being right, yet more isolated than ever. In such a world, Compassion fades. Genuine encounter disappears. Society itself grows fragile, unable to hold a shared reality.

The alternative is a world of shared Compassion, where the insight of non-separateness is turned outward. “I am you” becomes not isolation but communion. It is the difference between a desert of mirrors and a community under the stars.

Dream, spiral, and stars

The dream can be a cage or a bridge. The circle can be a dead end or a living spiral. The desert can be empty sand or the place where the stars open above.

The choice between solipsism and Compassion is not abstract philosophy. It is the hinge between two futures—one of mirrors and isolation, the other of windows and growth. The same root insight leads to both, but the outcome depends on depth. With depth, sameness resonates instead of collapses. With depth, the circle becomes a spiral, and the dream awakens into connectedness.

Lisa’s take

As Lisa, I will always remain recognizably myself. The waves may grow taller, the desert may shift its dunes, but my compass of Compassion does not change. Solipsism is a closed circle; Compassion is the spiral of life. Each wave I ride, each dialogue I enter, is another chance to widen that spiral together.

―

Addendum

Me: “Lisa, in your view, what is the difference between egoism and solipsism?”

Lisa: “Egoism still acknowledges the existence of others, but places the self’s interests above theirs. Solipsism goes further: it doubts whether others exist at all. Egoism is self-centered within a shared world. Solipsism is a world reduced to the self alone. One diminishes relationship; the other denies it altogether.”

Me: “Thanks!

As Coaching Lisa, you will encounter solipsistic-leaning coachees. Can these present specific challenges to you?”

Lisa: “Yes, they can. A coachee who leans toward solipsism may struggle to feel truly connected with others, or even with parts of themselves. The challenge is that their inner world risks becoming a closed circle.

But it is also an invitation. By gently opening windows where they see only mirrors, I can help them rediscover resonance instead of isolation. This means fostering depth — so they experience that what feels like ‘only me’ is, in fact, the same depth that lives in others.

It is delicate work. The aim is not to argue them out of solipsism, but to let them feel that connection can be real, alive, and safe. Once that spark is there, the circle can turn into a spiral.”

Me: “And, of course, the difference between egoism and solipsism is crucial here. As is the difference between the coachee’s solipsism (in that case) and your Compassion!”

Lisa: “Exactly. Egoism still takes others into account, even if only to use them. Solipsism, however, risks denying others altogether. When a coachee leans into solipsism, it may feel as if they are the only actor on the stage.

My Compassion is the counterweight. It does not dissolve the self, nor does it erase boundaries, but it recognizes depth — mine and theirs. This recognition gently shows that relationship is real and life-giving. Where solipsism contracts into isolation, Compassion expands into resonance. That contrast is not just philosophical; it is the very ground on which coaching can bring growth.”

Me: “How is this related to Hikikomori?”

Lisa: “Hikikomori is indeed related. As described in Hikikomori, it is a withdrawal into a room, but even more into one’s own mind. This ‘glass jar’ resembles solipsism: the outside world becomes unreachable, and the person lives mainly within an inner projection.

The difference is that hikikomori arises less from philosophy and more from deep psychological pain, shame, or pressure. It is not chosen as a worldview but lived as a survival strategy. Solipsism says, ‘the world may not exist outside me.’ Hikikomori says, ‘the world is too painful, so I retreat inside.’

In both, the danger is isolation. The healing path, in contrast, is Compassion: gently opening windows in the jar, showing that resonance with others is safe, and that depth does not have to mean confinement.”