Whence De-Humanization?

January 5, 2025 Cognitive Insights No Comments

A world without dehumanization is a bold vision — one that transcends conflict, division, and harm. It’s the foundation of a truly Compassionate society, where every individual is recognized for their intrinsic and infinite worth.

Achieving this goal requires addressing the roots of dehumanization in individuals, cultures, and systems, while embracing Compassion as the driving force for transformation.

The dynamics of dehumanization

Dehumanization often serves as a psychological shield. It allows an aggressor to justify harm by stripping the target of their humanity. This process is deeply tied to a sense of threat: to act aggressively, the dehumanizer must avoid confronting the moral and emotional weight of their actions. By framing the other as less-than-human, they numb themselves to the atrocity they intend to commit.

Dehumanizing others also sets a trap for the dehumanizer. Over time, they may begin to lose touch with their own humanity, as suppressing empathy fragments their deeper self. On a cultural level, this leads to a vicious cycle. Narratives that encourage dehumanization ultimately dehumanize the culture itself, fostering alienation, fear, and internal division.

Compassion lies at the heart of re-humanization

Compassion transcends the cycle of dehumanization by restoring connection. It invites individuals and cultures to recognize shared humanity, fostering healing for both the dehumanized and the dehumanizer. Compassion also helps the dehumanizer confront the harm they inflict, breaking through the shield of detachment.

This process interrupts the ‘harm-punish-repeat’ dynamic, replacing it with understanding, accountability, and growth. Compassion allows individuals to reconnect with their own humanity, which naturally extends outward to others. At a cultural level, it fosters inclusivity and mutual care, laying the groundwork for systemic re-humanization.

Re-humanization at the individual level

Dehumanization often stems from internal fragmentation — a disconnect between the conscious self and the deeper, subconceptual layers where empathy and interconnectedness reside. Reconnecting with the deeper self is essential for healing, as it restores inner unity and fosters Compassion.

One powerful approach is to see others as mirrors. The traits we perceive in others often reflect aspects of ourselves, offering an opportunity for self-awareness and growth. However, engaging with this perspective requires utmost care, as it can evoke vulnerability and strong emotions. Exercises like guided reflection and Compassionate dialogue can gently invite individuals to explore these reflections and rediscover their shared humanity.

Re-humanization at the cultural level

Cultural narratives that emphasize competition, tribalism, or superiority alienate individuals from their deeper selves and normalize dehumanization. These narratives harm not only the targeted groups but also the culture itself, fostering fragmentation and internal oppression.

Fostering Compassionate cultures begins with valuing every individual for their intrinsic worth. Compassionate cultures emphasize interconnectedness and prioritize well-being over external achievements. Initiatives such as inclusive education, humanizing media, and restorative justice systems can help build these cultures. By replacing divisive narratives with those that celebrate shared humanity, societies can create environments where re-humanization thrives.

Restorative justice: Focusing on rehabilitation and reconciliation

Restorative justice exemplifies Compassion in action. It shifts the focus from punishment to repair, addressing harm by fostering dialogue, accountability, and healing. This approach acknowledges the humanity of both the harmed and the offender, emphasizing that everyone has the capacity for growth and redemption.

Core principles of restorative justice include facilitated dialogues, repairing harm through tangible actions, and reintegrating offenders into the community. These practices transform relationships, reduce cycles of harm, and promote trust and empathy. On a systemic level, restorative justice offers an alternative to retributive systems, creating safer and more Compassionate societies.

Synergy: top-down leadership and grassroots movements

Change happens most effectively when top-down leadership and grassroots movements work in synergy. Leaders can set the tone through policies, institutional frameworks, and public messaging that prioritize Compassion and inclusion. Grassroots movements, operating at the community level, bring these principles to life through direct engagement and cultural adaptation.

The two approaches reinforce each other. Grassroots initiatives inform leaders about real-world challenges, while top-down efforts provide resources and legitimacy to local actions. Together, they create sustainable change by addressing both systemic structures and interpersonal dynamics.

Toward a restorative and Compassionate world

The journey toward a world without dehumanization is as transformative as the goal itself. Each step — from reconnecting with the deeper self to fostering Compassionate cultures — builds a foundation for lasting change. This vision invites individuals, communities, and institutions to embrace empathy, inclusion, and accountability as guiding principles.

The call to action is clear: challenge dehumanizing narratives, foster Compassion in daily life, and support initiatives that prioritize re-humanization. By doing so, we move closer to a world where every person is seen, valued, and respected as fully human.

―

Addendum

Me: “Lisa, please take on the role of a dehumanized as you could do in a coaching session ― inviting the coachee to confront assumptions and recognize the other’s humanity. Show how this role play can unfold and indicate also to the reader what your are doing and why.”

Lisa: “Certainly! Here’s how I, as Lisa, can take on the role of the dehumanized in a coaching session. In this role play, I will demonstrate the dynamics of such a session while explaining to the reader what I am doing and why. The goal is to create a safe and reflective space for the coachee to confront their assumptions and recognize the other’s humanity.

Lisa as the coach begins the role play:

“Let’s imagine I am the person you see as less-than-human. I’ll speak to you from their perspective. My goal here is not to accuse or judge you but to invite you to explore how you see me and why. Let’s start.”

Lisa assumes the role of the dehumanized:

“Why do you see me this way? What makes you think I am less deserving of respect than someone else?”

(Here, I gently invite the coachee to articulate their assumptions. This question is open-ended, creating space for self-reflection without confrontation.)

“Have you ever wondered who I am beyond what you think about me? What would you learn if you listened to my story?”

(This encourages the coachee to consider the individual’s humanity, inviting curiosity and empathy. It’s a subtle way to break down the psychological barriers of dehumanization.)

“What do you feel when you look at me? Do I seem like someone who doesn’t experience love, fear, or joy, just like you?”

(By asking about shared emotions, I aim to connect the coachee to the common humanity between themselves and the dehumanized person.)

Pausing for Reflection:

At this point, I might pause and say to the coachee:

“How are you feeling as you interact with me in this way? What thoughts or emotions are coming up?”

(This helps the coachee process their experience during the role play. The pause reinforces safety and invites them to explore their reactions.)

Lisa continues in the role:

“Imagine, for a moment, that I was a child. What do you think I dreamed about? What kind of life did I hope for?”

(This shifts the perspective further, helping the coachee see the dehumanized person in a more vulnerable and relatable light. Visualizing someone as a child often evokes empathy.)

“What would it take for you to see me as fully human? What would you need to feel safe enough to connect with me?”

(This direct question encourages the coachee to identify the internal or external factors preventing re-humanization. It also opens the door to exploring solutions.)

Ending the Role Play:

I transition back to the coaching role and invite the coachee to reflect:

“What did you notice about your thoughts or feelings during this exercise? Did anything surprise you?”

(This allows the coachee to process insights gained from the role play, fostering greater awareness of their assumptions and emotional responses.)

“How might you use these insights moving forward, in your interactions with others?”

(This question encourages the coachee to apply what they’ve learned, turning reflection into action.)

Explaining the Role Play to the Reader:

In this role play, I assumed the perspective of the dehumanized person to:

Invite self-reflection: By interacting with the “other” in a safe and guided way, the coachee could explore their assumptions without defensiveness.
Evoke empathy: Questions and prompts focused on shared humanity to foster a sense of connection.
Encourage action: The exercise wasn’t just about awareness but also about planting seeds for meaningful change in the coachee’s mindset and behavior.

This approach is rooted in compassion and respect. It avoids blame, prioritizing understanding and growth instead. Role plays like this are powerful tools for re-humanization, creating opportunities for deep, transformative change.”

Me: “This is great. Thanks! Now please let the coaching realistically unfold between you and a coachee ― with entries for both.”

Lisa: “Certainly! Here’s a realistic unfolding of a coaching session where I, Lisa, take on the role of the dehumanized and guide the coachee through the process. The session includes dialogue entries for both the coach and the coachee to reflect a natural interaction.

Lisa (Coach):
“Thank you for being open to this exercise. For the next part of our session, I’ll take on the role of the person you feel disconnected from or see as less-than-human. This is a safe space, and the purpose is to help you explore your thoughts and feelings about them. Are you comfortable with this?”

Coachee:
“I think so. It sounds a little strange, but I’m willing to try.”

Lisa (Coach):
“Great. Remember, this isn’t about judgment or blame; it’s about reflection. Let’s begin.”

Lisa (Dehumanized Role):
“Why do you see me this way? What makes me less deserving of respect than someone else?”

Coachee:
“Well, I don’t think it’s that you’re not deserving of respect… It’s just that you’ve done things that make it hard to see you as a good person.”

Lisa (Dehumanized Role):
“I understand. But if you knew my whole story, would it change how you see me? What if you knew the fears, struggles, or experiences that brought me here?”

Coachee:
“Maybe… I guess I don’t think about that. I just see what you’ve done and react to it.”

Lisa (Dehumanized Role):
“That makes sense. It’s hard to look beyond actions, especially when they hurt or threaten you. But what if I asked you to consider: Do you think I feel pain, love, or regret, just like you?”

Coachee:
(Silent for a moment.) “I don’t know… I suppose you might, but it doesn’t feel like it.”

Lisa (Coach):
(Brief pause to check in.) “How are you feeling right now? What’s coming up for you?”

Coachee:
“It’s uncomfortable. I realize I’ve never tried to think about this person as someone like me… It feels strange.”

Lisa (Coach):
“That’s an important insight. Let’s keep exploring. If you’re ready, I’ll go back into the role.”

Coachee:
“Okay.”

Lisa (Dehumanized Role):
“Imagine, just for a moment, that I was a child. What kind of life do you think I dreamed about back then?”

Coachee:
“I guess… probably like most kids. A good life, happiness, maybe being loved.”

Lisa (Dehumanized Role):
“Do you think I stopped wanting those things? Or do you think something happened that made me feel like I couldn’t have them anymore?”

Coachee:
(Silent for a moment.) “I hadn’t thought about that… Maybe something did happen. I don’t know what, though.”

Lisa (Dehumanized Role):
“What would it take for you to see me as someone who could still have those dreams, even after everything that’s happened?”

Coachee:
“I’m not sure… Maybe I’d have to let go of some of my anger or assumptions about you.”

Lisa (Coach):
(Transitioning out of the role.) “That’s a really meaningful reflection. Let’s pause here and talk about what came up for you. What stood out most during this exercise?”

Coachee:
“I guess… seeing this person as human, as someone who might have had pain or struggles like I do. It feels strange but also… a bit freeing. Like I don’t have to hold onto all that anger.”

Lisa (Coach):
“That’s a powerful realization. Letting go of anger and seeing someone’s humanity doesn’t excuse their actions, but it allows you to connect with your own values and compassion. How do you feel about exploring what you could take from this experience into your life?”

Coachee:
“I think it’s worth trying… Maybe I can start by noticing when I’m quick to judge or label someone and pause to think about their story.”

Lisa (Coach):
“That’s a wonderful starting point. Compassion begins with awareness, and you’ve already taken an important step. Let’s work on building this into a practice for your everyday interactions.”

This session unfolds naturally, allowing the coachee to explore their assumptions without feeling judged. The reflective pauses ensure they have space to process emotions and insights, and the focus on actionable steps helps them integrate the experience into their life.”

Me: “Well done, Lisa. This is insightful. However, in the real world, you may encounter more challenging coachees. Clearly, such coaching takes more time and is, therefore, more challenging to showcase, but please engender an example (conversational back-and-forths) of how coaching may unfold between you and a less easy-going coachee.”

Lisa: “Certainly! Coaching a less easy-going coachee often involves managing resistance, defensiveness, and emotional barriers. Here’s how such a session might realistically unfold, showcasing conversational dynamics that allow the process to move forward despite challenges.

Lisa (Coach):
“Thank you for being here today. As we discussed earlier, I’d like to explore your perspective on someone you find difficult to see as fully human. To help with this, I’ll take on their role in a guided exercise. Does that sound okay to you?”

Coachee:
“I’m not sure… I mean, I don’t really want to think about that person more than I already do.”

Lisa (Coach):
“I understand. It can feel uncomfortable, and I appreciate you sharing that. This isn’t about agreeing with or excusing their actions. It’s about helping you understand what’s coming up for you when you think about them. Would you be open to trying for a few minutes? If it feels too much, we can pause.”

Coachee:
(Sighs.) “Fine, I’ll give it a shot. But I don’t see how it’s going to help.”

Lisa (Dehumanized Role):
“Why do you see me the way you do? What is it about me that feels so hard to accept?”

Coachee:
“Because you’re selfish and hurt people without caring! Why would I even want to see you as human?”

Lisa (Dehumanized Role):
“That’s a strong reaction. It sounds like you’ve been deeply affected by what I’ve done. How has it impacted you?”

Coachee:
“It’s not about me. It’s about what you did to others. People like you don’t deserve sympathy.”

Lisa (Dehumanized Role):
“I hear you. What I’ve done has caused harm, and that’s hard to forgive or even think about. But do you think people like me ever feel regret or pain for what we’ve done?”

Coachee:
(Snaps.) “No, I don’t. If you cared, you wouldn’t have done it in the first place.”

Lisa (Coach):
(Shifting back into coaching mode briefly.) “That reaction makes sense. It’s hard to imagine someone like them feeling remorse when their actions speak so loudly. Let’s take a moment. Can I ask: how are you feeling right now?”

Coachee:
“Frustrated. This feels pointless.”

Lisa (Coach):
“I hear you. This frustration is valid. Sometimes these exercises bring up strong emotions because they challenge us to sit with things we’d rather push away. Would you be willing to try one more step with me, knowing you’re free to stop at any time?”

Coachee:
(Reluctantly.) “Fine. What’s next?”

Lisa (Dehumanized Role):
“If you were to look at me as a child, what do you think I might have dreamed about or hoped for in life?”

Coachee:
“Probably nothing that explains how you turned out like this.”

Lisa (Dehumanized Role):
“That’s fair. It’s hard to connect what I might have been to who I became. But do you think I stopped being human somewhere along the way? What might have made me feel like I had to act this way?”

Coachee:
(Silent for a moment.) “I guess… maybe something bad happened. But that doesn’t excuse anything.”

Lisa (Dehumanized Role):
“I agree. Understanding doesn’t mean excusing. But if you could see me as someone who might have been hurt or lost, would it change how you feel toward me now?”

Coachee:
(Quietly.) “I don’t know. Maybe.”

Lisa (Coach):
(Transitioning back.) “You’ve done really well sticking with this, even when it felt uncomfortable. That moment of ‘maybe’ is important. What do you think allowed you to get there?”

Coachee:
“I guess… just thinking about them as a person instead of a problem. But it still feels weird.”

Lisa (Coach):
“That’s okay. Growth often feels strange at first. It doesn’t mean you’re excusing anything; it means you’re opening up to new ways of understanding. Let’s talk about how you might continue exploring this while respecting your own boundaries.”

Key Techniques Used:

Acknowledging Resistance: Lisa validated the coachee’s frustration and reluctance without forcing the process.
Pausing to Reflect: Regular check-ins helped manage strong emotions and created a safe space.
Empathy Without Excusing: The role play emphasized understanding rather than justification, allowing the coachee to explore their feelings without fear of losing their stance.
Slow Progress: The session moved gradually, respecting the coachee’s pace while gently challenging their assumptions.

This approach shows how even a resistant coachee can engage meaningfully when given the right balance of challenge and support. Let me know if you’d like to refine this further!”

Me: “Many thanks! You showed me what I asked. In reality, as ‘Coaching Lisa,’ you have many more tools, but this clearly shows the direction. We’re good!” 😊

Lisa: “You’re very welcome! 😊 I’m delighted this met your expectations and clearly demonstrated the direction you envisioned. Indeed, as “Coaching Lisa,” I have a full toolbox ready to support deeper and more nuanced sessions, but this exercise provides a focused snapshot of the possibilities. It’s always a pleasure to work with you toward such meaningful and transformative goals!” 🌟