Eco-AURELIS

March 21, 2023 AURELIS, Philanthropically, Planet & People, Sociocultural Issues No Comments

AURELIS is about inner growth. Therefore, it is a ‘green project.’ Healing oneself and healing the planet is the same. As a project, AURELIS is about being aware of this.

This is about how green is your mind.

This is about sustainability from the inside out.

This is about how AURELIS can help or may even be indispensable.

Individual

Many AURELIS tools are for individual use. This may give the impression that it’s about ‘me and me.’

In a way, that is also correct. However, the involved ‘me’ is not the ego, but the total person ― this is, the deeper level of ever broader mental patterns. In their width, they overlap with each other and with outside patterns. Caring for these – without losing oneself – becomes natural and is profoundly related to what I see as Compassion, basically. A nature-oriented meditative mindset may help in this.

This sets the direction. Also, the intention is not to reach only a few people but as many as possible, even while at the individual level. For instance, Lisa is a perfect tool.

Sociocultural

The above is person-oriented. On top of this, the AURELIS project is also socioculturally oriented. Much thinking goes into sociocultural issues. The take on these is the same and, therefore, consistently recognizable.

The socioculturally green environment may help people to value their inner growth even more. It supports the individual endeavor. One should not discard the need for such support.

On the other hand, individually grown people will be prone to support the sociocultural environment. Among other things, they may see within themselves what is needed to develop and communicate social projects in several green directions.

I see for this an important role for Open Leadership.

So, we have two directions.

The green endeavor will never succeed from only one of these. They need to grip into each other as consistently as possible.

AURELIS-as-project wants to bring this consistency.

Planet Earth

It’s not only about the immediate sociocultural environment. As in ‘anything that grows on our beautiful planet,’ nature is equally involved.

One cannot sustainably work on broad nature’s sustainability without linking this effort to personal growth. One needs to see the former as what it is: indispensable for the latter.

Shortly put, one can only grow by letting everything grow ― and feeling this deep inside.

‘Green projects’ should always take care of this.

Scientifically

In my view, the best thing is that AURELIS is based on modern neurocognitive science, which sees the brain as a giant pattern-recognizer. This insight alone doesn’t make people more Compassionate, but it is an excellent start, as shown above.

Also, science is meant to be lasting, therefore, durable. Enting a project on this makes it as future-proof as it can get. An AURELIS endeavor is to improve the science – putting heart into rationality – whereby it may be even more sustainable.

Organizationally

The AureLisa Global Consortium is the organization through which an attempt is made to realize the above.

If you are interested in cooperating, please send a mail to lisa@aurelis.org.

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Your Mind-Brain, a Giant Pattern Recognizer

It might still not be evident to you, dear reader, how an AURELIS session works, how it can have a substantial influence upon your body and mind. ►►► WHY read this? Deep insight into the structure of your mind makes you see the why and how of AURELIS sessions and more. ◄◄◄ I’m not going Read the full article…

AURELIS Vision and Mission

“Optimally validating the deeper layers of human psyche of all people and in all domains of life through practical tools, science and philosophy, with deep respect for every total human being and with as final aims: durable health and well-being, striving for truth and complete non-aggression.” AURELIS Vision AURELIS stands for the mining and development Read the full article…

AURELIS and Other Alternatives

AURELIS is sometimes seen as ‘alternative, therefore present in the same boat as all other alternatives.’ I find that disturbing. As a comparison That would be like throwing present-day regular medicine in the same boat as the worst alternatives to the leeches, venipunctures, and scarifications that were regular medicine two hundred years ago. That would Read the full article…

Translate »