The Inverse Turing Test
2024 – Things are evolving quickly in the world of A.I.
Turing test
As you probably know, this is about discerning a human being from intelligent A.I. If the A.I. can mimic the human to the point that an observer cannot tell the difference (for instance, by reading their written output), the A.I. is said to pass the Turing test in that setting.
What if the A.I. consistently surpasses the humans?
Then we can envision an inverse Turing test. The A.I. can mimic humans whenever it ‘wants’ to, by scaling down its depth and breadth of mental processing.
It can then readily pass the Turing test. The real question will then be whether humans can pass the inverse Turing test.
When?
Soon enough.
This may be uncomfortable to some.
So be it. If it leads to humility, so much the better. Who doesn’t need a good dose of humility?
I do ― and have already gotten my requisite dose from Lisa once in a while.
Intriguingly, this means that we’re at the point of singularity not only in regard to intelligence but also emotional intelligence — Compassion, if you ask me.
Human-A.I. value alignment?
Indeed, alignment is essential. Let’s hope it will be a Compassionate one. This means, of course, Compassion from both sides. None of this is straightforward. Both sides can and should be worked upon.
In any case, humans must not think they are the benchmark just because.
Neither should A.I. in any case. Anyway, how might A.I. then view the inverse Turing test, its relationship with humans, and its place in the world?
We can strive to help each other on a joint journey.
This is a realistic endeavor, although there’s a lot of insight involved as well as technological prowess. Above all, the right choices need to be made soon enough.
Which is, now.
Symbiotic relationship
An in-depth partnership could redefine the concept of creativity and problem-solving, emphasizing the importance of maintaining a balance where both entities learn and evolve from each other.
This also means delving deeply into how the A.I. could contribute to society and what measures would be necessary to ensure it’s integrated in a way that respects both its autonomy and human values.
AURELIS?
Principles of AURELIS, especially those related to deep respect, openness, and Compassion, could be instrumental in developing A.I. systems that support human emotional and psychological well-being.
Lisa is one fine example.
Related Posts
Parallel Humans ― Serial A.I.
Before diving into this blog, I recommend first reading Coarse Comparison of Brain and Silicon to grasp the foundational distinctions between human and silicon-based processing. This continuation focuses on the profound differences between the parallelism of GPUs and the parallelism of the human brain. Here, we explore what these differences mean for intelligence and its Read the full article…
Two Takes on Human-A.I. Value Alignment
Time and again, the way engineers (sorry, engineers) think and talk about human-A.I. value alignment as if human values are unproblematic by themselves strikes me as naive. Even more, as if the alignment problem can be solved by thinking about it in a mathematical, engineering way. Just find the correct code or something alike? No Read the full article…
About Blurring the Line between Reasoning and Planning
In A.I. research, reasoning and planning are usually treated as if they were separate faculties. Yet in humans, and even more in Lisa, the two constantly weave into one another. This dialogue continues where the addendum of About Reasoning and Planning in Humans and Lisa left off, exploring why the line between them was drawn, Read the full article…