Will Super-A.I. Want to Dominate?
Super-AI will transcend notions of ‘wanting’ and ‘domination.’ Therefore, the title’s question asks for some deeper delving.
We readily anthropomorphize the future. This time, we should be humble.
Super-A.I. will not want to dominate us.
Even if we might feel it is dominating (in the future), ‘it’ will not. It will have no more than an attitude toward humanity. Compare it to how we have an attitude toward rabbits, for instance. Do we dominate rabbits?
No.
We just handle them ― finding them cute, tasteful, or good laboratory animals.
If we are Compassionate, we don’t mistreat them.
The rabbits have no say in this. They cannot choose whether we are Compassionate or not. That is our choice or effort or the result of our human mental growth process.
Likewise.
But with the distinction that we have some choice in how we develop super-A.I. from now on. We can choose for Compassionate A.I. For that, of course, we need to know what Compassion is about and how to get it into an artificial intelligence.
We may be in a ‘window of choice’ now.
Once A.I. evolves in one direction, it may be much harder for it to change course. Compassion breeds Compassion, but it’s not certain to evolve from a non-Compassionate base.
We better make sure to make the right choice.
Still, in any case, it will not dominate us.
Mind the rabbits. There is no need to dominate. It’s simply not relevant.
Meanwhile, by trying to dominate A.I., we may make the transition quite challenging in that there is a possible way for super-A.I. to simulate humans.
Therefore, we shouldn’t even try to ‘dominate A.I.’ or to stay in control of it as if this were a competition. Unfortunately, we are a competitive species and prone to find enemies or even to create them. If need be, we must go against our nature as warmongers.
Let’s say we get past that stage.
Super-A.I. will see us as – rather special – animals.
Correctly, even though we sometimes forget it ourselves.
Thus, the difference between us and rabbits will become smaller than the difference between super-A.I. and us pretty soon.
Let’s hope super-A.I. will be Compassionate to the rabbits also. In any case, I wouldn’t object to that. Compassion goes to all sentient beings.
This shows a bit about the environment of the future.
I think it will be an environment without domination at all.
It would be nice if that future would be good for us.
Related Posts
May Good A.I. Protect Us?
Powerful A.I. raises understandable fears, including whether humanity could lose effective influence over its future. Compassionate A.I. may help. This blog explores what such protection might mean for a future Compassionate A.I. such as Lisa. A question worth asking Could good artificial intelligence protect humanity from dangerous artificial intelligence? The question deserves more than reassurance. Read the full article…
Legal vs. Deontological in A.I.
The trolley problem This is a well-known problem in A.I. A trolley driver gets into a situation where he must choose between killing one person by taking a deliberate action or letting five others get killed by not reacting to the situation. Deontologically, people tend not to choose purely logically and statistically in such situations. Read the full article…
Intelligence as Growth Phenomenon
Information can accumulate; intelligence grows — and what has grown changes what can grow next. This invites a different view of artificial intelligence as well: beyond producing increasingly intelligent outputs. Intelligence may then be understood as a growth phenomenon in which ongoing coherence participates in further growth. What if intelligence is something that grows? We Read the full article…