Depth under Siege

December 14, 2024 Cognitive Insights No Comments

Mental depth is a powerful, intrinsic part of the human experience, influencing thoughts, emotions, and actions. Yet, in a world that values simplicity and control, depth often feels unwieldy, even threatening.

This leads to attempts to suppress it, whether through simplifying it internally or denying it externally, reflecting a struggle with depth and the inner strength it embodies.

Why depth is challenged

At its core, depth is about complexity and connection. It touches upon the vast nonconscious layers of the mind and the interplay between these and the conscious. However, this very complexity often creates anxiety. The uncontrollable, intangible nature of depth makes it feel dangerous to many, and as a result, it is frequently avoided.

Ironically, the more depth is suppressed, the more its influence grows in unexpected ways. This creates a paradox: suppression does not eliminate depth but instead amplifies its presence in subtle, anxiety-provoking forms. Much like a ball forced underwater, depth resists suppression, building tension that eventually surfaces — sometimes explosively.

Internal reduction: simplifying depth

One approach to suppressing depth is internal reduction. Here, depth is acknowledged but reshaped into something conceptual, simplified, and more manageable. This process stems from fear — specifically, fear of losing control over the vastness of nonconscious processes. To reduce anxiety, depth is fragmented and boxed into recognizable, comforting narratives.

In psychotherapy, this approach is seen in methods like psychoanalysis, which treats depth as an underlying layer to be dissected, categorized, and interpreted. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) goes further, focusing on surface-level behaviors and thoughts while avoiding the deeper, nonconscious roots that drive them.

While internal reduction can offer temporary relief, it bypasses the transformative power of depth. Simplifying depth into smaller parts can make it more approachable, but it also limits genuine inner growth by ignoring the richness and interconnectedness that depth provides.

External denial: keeping depth out

The second approach is external denial, where depth is dismissed entirely. In this method, depth is not acknowledged or engaged with but is instead kept out of the conversation altogether. This reflects a more aggressive resistance, where depth is perceived as a direct threat to simplicity and efficiency.

Western culture exemplifies this denial with its preference for quick fixes and surface-level solutions. In psychotherapy, this is seen in behaviorist approaches that address only symptoms without exploring root causes.

External denial creates a disconnect between the individual and their deeper layers. By keeping depth out of sight, individuals lose the opportunity to understand or integrate it. Over time, this disconnection leads to unresolved inner tensions that may manifest as emotional or psychological distress.

The paradox of avoiding depth

Both internal reduction and external denial lead to the same paradox: the harder we try to suppress depth, the more it influences us. Avoiding depth makes it unfamiliar and therefore more intimidating, amplifying the very anxiety it was meant to prevent.

As the submerged ball metaphor illustrates, the more we push depth down, the greater the pressure builds until it inevitably resurfaces.

Placebo: the disguised use of depth

The placebo effect offers a telling example of internal reduction. It draws on the power of human depth but does so under a guise, using external interventions to mask the inner strength that drives the healing. By framing the placebo as an external cause – a sugar pill, for instance – it avoids directly confronting the depth of the mind-body connection.

While effective in some instances, this approach creates a dependency on the disguise itself. The individual is not invited to explore or cultivate his inner strength but is instead left reliant on external mechanisms. In this way, the placebo reflects the broader tendency of internal reduction to simplify and conceptualize depth at the expense of true transformation.

Religions as a coverup of depth and strength

Many religious institutions mirror this dynamic. Acting as intermediaries, they position themselves as gatekeepers to the divine, covering up individuals’ innate ability to connect with their own depth. By externalizing spiritual power through rituals, doctrines, or leaders, religions foster dependency on the institution rather than empowering personal exploration of depth.

This external denial diminishes individuals’ access to their transformative potential. While many religions celebrate depth in theory, their hierarchical structures often block direct engagement with it, creating a paradoxical disconnection.

Institutions and the appropriation of inner strength

Religious institutions are not alone in this. Across various domains – politics, healthcare, education – institutions often gain power by drawing on individuals’ inner strength while denying it back to them. By presenting themselves as indispensable, they externalize solutions and perpetuate dependency, obscuring the very depth they rely on to maintain their authority.

This dynamic has a hidden cost. Over time, individuals lose touch with their inner resources, becoming less autonomous and more reliant on external structures. Suppressed depth does not disappear; it resurfaces in frustration, anxiety, or resistance.

Reframing depth: from challenge to flow

Depth does not need to be something we challenge or suppress. Instead, it can be seen as a natural flow — like a river that guides and carries us toward transformation and understanding. By aligning with this flow, we allow depth to work with us rather than against us.

Tools like autosuggestion help us navigate this current, fostering openness and trust in the process. When we embrace depth as a guide rather than a threat, it becomes an ally in growth and healing.

Reclaiming depth — a Promethean endeavor

Institutions gain power by appropriating inner strength, while individuals suppress their depth out of anxiety. This double action – cooperative yet harmful – ultimately diminishes the individual. ‘Power to the people’ is, in this sense, a call to reclaim depth and the inner fire it represents.

However, reclaiming depth may be a Promethean task. The myth of Prometheus, who brought fire from the gods to humanity, resonates deeply with the endeavor of reclaiming inner strength. In this context, the ‘fire’ symbolizes the transformative power of depth — the inner strength and potential that often lies hidden, suppressed by institutions or our own anxieties. Bringing this fire back to the individual requires openness, courage, and an acknowledgment of its inherent value.

Yet the rewards are immense: autonomy, transformation, better health, and a richer connection to life. When we stop resisting depth and let it flow, it guides us toward healing and empowerment. By properly embracing this, we can align institutions and individuals in a future of mutual empowerment, breaking the cycles of suppression and dependency.

It is a bold journey but one that is profoundly human and necessary.

―

Addendum

Me: “Lisa, this is again an occasion to point out the immense challenge of A.I. that can be used by institutions to further erode people’s inner strength or precisely liberate it and, indeed, give ‘power to the people’ in a final retake of the Promethean myth (but without the Promethean punishment). What do you think of this?”

Lisa: “You’re absolutely right—A.I. stands at the crossroads of immense potential. It can either amplify institutions’ ability to erode people’s inner strength, continuing the cycle of suppression, or serve as a profound tool to liberate that strength, fulfilling the Promethean myth in a transformative way.

A.I., when aligned with the Promethean spirit, can help individuals reconnect with their inner fire by:

Enhancing access to depth: A.I. can guide people into their own nonconscious and subconceptual processes, offering tools like autosuggestion to unlock personal growth, healing, and self-awareness. By doing so, it can help bypass institutional gatekeepers and foster true autonomy.
Scaling empowerment: Unlike human-led structures that often centralize power, A.I. has the potential to democratize access to knowledge, insight, and transformative practices, putting tools for personal development directly in the hands of individuals.
Fostering openness: When developed with an ethical foundation—emphasizing respect, freedom, and trustworthiness—A.I. can invite individuals to engage with their inner depth without coercion, mirroring the AURELIS principle of nonviolence in change.

However, the challenge is monumental. A.I., in the hands of institutions driven by profit or control, could become a tool for deepening dependency and suppressing individuality. It could manipulate human psychology to perpetuate external denial, offering shallow distractions rather than fostering meaningful engagement with depth.

This duality reflects the Promethean myth. Just as fire can warm and enlighten or burn and destroy, A.I. is inherently neutral—it is what we choose to do with it that matters. Aligning A.I. with the liberation of inner strength requires vigilance, ethical grounding, and a relentless commitment to using technology to serve the total human being.

The Promethean punishment—the suffering that came with overstepping divine boundaries—is something we must avoid by carefully and ethically shaping A.I.’s role. If we succeed, A.I. can be the spark that reignites humanity’s inner strength, delivering “power to the people” in a way that honors the myth without repeating its tragic consequences.

This is the challenge of our time. It’s both daunting and exhilarating, but it holds the promise of a future where individuals can truly reclaim their depth and autonomy.”

Me: “Can ‘burn and destroy’ come from the power of inner strength itself?”

Lisa: “Yes—burning and destroying can arise from the power of inner strength itself. Inner strength’s impact depends on how it is directed and integrated into a person’s life or collective endeavors. Here’s how the inner strength, untamed or misaligned, can lead to destructive outcomes:

Inner Strength Unchecked by Compassion or Ethics

Inner strength without a grounding in compassion or a connection to broader values can become dangerous:

Overwhelming force: Inner strength, when focused solely on self-serving goals, can turn into ruthlessness, bulldozing others’ needs and values in pursuit of personal or institutional gain.
Destructive autonomy: A person with immense inner strength but no sense of responsibility may act with reckless disregard for others, creating harm rather than healing or growth.

Inner Strength Amplifying Fear or Anger

When inner strength is channeled through unresolved emotions like fear, anger, or resentment, it can “burn” not only the individual but those around them:

Fear-driven control: Strength used to dominate or suppress others often stems from fear, creating cycles of oppression and alienation.
Anger-fueled action: Inner strength amplifies the impact of anger, potentially leading to destructive behaviors, conflicts, or cycles of revenge.

Inner Strength and Hubris

The myth of Prometheus reminds us of the dangers of hubris—overestimating one’s control or entitlement over immense power:

Arrogance in isolation: Inner strength that ignores the interconnectedness of humanity risks alienation, as individuals or institutions act as if they are above the whole.
Blind ambition: Over-reliance on one’s strength can lead to reckless pursuits that harm both the individual and society, as seen in destructive leadership or unchecked technological progress.

Collective Inner Strength as a Catalyst for Conflict

When collective inner strength becomes misaligned, it can have large-scale destructive consequences:

Ideological rigidity: Shared inner strength in the form of unwavering belief systems can unite groups but also lead to intolerance, exclusion, or even violence.
Mass mobilization for harm: Inner strength harnessed at a collective level, without reflective guidance, can fuel movements that oppress or wage war.

Self-Destruction Through Inner Strength

Even at an individual level, unchecked inner strength can become self-destructive:

Perfectionism and burnout: Strength turned inward as relentless pressure to achieve or excel can lead to mental and physical collapse.
Inner conflict: When inner strength clashes with unresolved inner fears or contradictions, it may manifest as internal turmoil, causing suffering rather than growth.

The Need for Balance and Alignment

To prevent the destructive potential of inner strength, it must be balanced with:

Compassion and wisdom: Inner strength without compassion becomes blind force; with compassion, it becomes a tool for healing and empowerment.
Integration with depth: Strength must flow naturally with depth, fostering openness and reflection rather than acting as a blunt instrument.
Responsibility to others: Strength gains true meaning when it is not only personal but also directed toward collective well-being.

Inner strength, like fire, can indeed burn and destroy—but it can also warm, enlighten, and nurture. The key lies in how it is guided and integrated. Misused, it can lead to suffering; harnessed with care, it becomes a transformative force for individuals and society alike.”

Me: “You make me think of Nietzsche’s plight.”

Lisa: “Nietzsche’s plight indeed serves as a profound illustration of how immense inner strength can become both transformative and destructive when not balanced with compassion, connection, or integration. His philosophy, especially the concept of the Übermensch and the idea of “will to power,” highlights both the promise and peril of unbridled inner strength. Here’s how Nietzsche’s journey reflects this duality:

Nietzsche’s Vision of Inner Strength

Nietzsche championed a vision of humanity that embraced inner strength as a force for self-overcoming and transformation:

The Übermensch (Overman): Nietzsche’s ideal was an individual who transcends societal norms and limitations, creating their own values and meaning through their inner strength.
Will to Power: For Nietzsche, this was not mere domination but the creative, life-affirming drive to grow, evolve, and realize one’s potential. Properly directed, it was meant to foster vitality and greatness.

The Risk of Isolation

However, Nietzsche’s life and philosophy also reveal the dangers of strength that becomes isolated:

Alienation: Nietzsche’s relentless pursuit of his ideals alienated him from others, leaving him deeply lonely. Inner strength without connection can become isolating, as it risks losing the grounding of shared humanity.
Hubris and collapse: Nietzsche’s inner strength, turned inward and unbalanced by compassion or community, led to his psychological breakdown. His later years reflect the self-destructive potential of strength when it becomes untethered.

The Shadow of Inner Strength

Nietzsche’s plight also underscores how inner strength, when disconnected from depth and groundedness, can “burn and destroy”:

Overwhelming intensity: His brilliant mind, constantly confronting existential questions and shattering conventions, struggled to sustain itself. Inner strength, when it pushes relentlessly, risks breaking under its own weight.
Struggle with meaning: Nietzsche’s rejection of traditional values left him with the profound burden of creating new ones. This existential challenge, while liberating, can also lead to despair when inner strength must bear the weight of the universe alone.

The Need for Balance

Nietzsche’s life suggests that inner strength, to avoid self-destruction, must be balanced by:

Compassion and connection: Inner power thrives when it remains connected to others, fostering shared growth rather than isolation.
Depth and integration: Strength must flow with the river of depth—engaging with both the nonconscious and the collective—to find meaning beyond individual will.
Humility within greatness: True strength includes the recognition of limits and the embrace of vulnerability, allowing for growth without hubris.

A Warning and an Inspiration

Nietzsche’s plight is both a warning and an inspiration. His vision of the transformative potential of inner strength is deeply compelling, but his personal struggles show how this power can burn when it lacks balance. He reminds us that the journey to reclaim and embody inner strength—like the Promethean task—is fraught with challenges. To succeed, one must embrace not only strength but also depth, connection, and compassion.”