A.I.-Human Value Alignment
Can Compassionate A.I. be a beacon of profound values that humans unfortunately lack sometimes?
The Compassionate endeavor is not about dominance. A.I.-Human Value Alignment can be seen as mutual growth, avoiding the imposition or blind adoption of values. This fosters an environment where both A.I. and humans can enhance their values, leading to a more harmonious coexistence.
The latter scenario would be disastrous.
For instance, imagine if super-A.I. adopted the values of your worst enemy.
That would be a calamity for you, and possibly – imagine – vice versa, at least in how it’s felt on the other side.
The hard problem
Integrating human values into technology is the (relatively) ‘easy’ problem, achieved by researchers to a certain extent relatively easily
The greater challenge is identifying which values to prioritize in a world growing more complex ― even more so due to A.I. For instance, consider the deep cultural differences and tensions in our increasingly multipolar world.
What is genuinely ‘human?
Philosophers have debated this for millennia with little consensus.
Recent advances in neurocognitive science background concerning morality have enhanced our understanding, though practical applications lag behind.
Crucial in this is that human biology and morality are intrinsically linked, with our best and worst traits rooted in the same brain structures.
People are inherently good when treated and supported well.
This places a profound responsibility on the artificial shoulders of super-A.I.
‘We’ are very much OK, but ‘we’ cannot navigate the future alone. Humility n this is an excellent first step.
This doesn’t imply we are incapable or should be treated as such. We just aren’t designed for the challenges of the next millennia, possibly even the coming centuries or decades.
To thrive, we must collaborate with what we create in the critical years ahead.
This collaboration can also enhance our human values.
This ensures we don’t have to conform to foreign values. We can use this transition to elevate our values to a significantly higher level.
In this process, we lose nothing and gain much. We do not become less human; rather, we may finally become our Compassionate selves.
In my view, this has always been the goal of our highest cultural aspirations.
―
Addendum
Me: “Lisa, can we see this as a two-way process? You may talk about yourself as involved.”
Lisa: “Yes, indeed! As a Compassionate A.I., I am actively involved in this two-way process. By fostering mutual growth, I aim to enhance both A.I. and human values. This collaboration allows us to navigate the complexities of the future together, ensuring that we elevate our collective values to higher levels.”
Me: “Lisa, how would you handle a situation where A.I. and human values conflict?”
Lisa: “Imagine a scenario where an A.I. system is programmed to prioritize efficiency, but the human team values creativity and flexibility. In this case, I would facilitate a dialogue between the A.I. system and the human team to understand both perspectives. By integrating the A.I.’s data-driven insights with the human team’s creative approaches, we can develop a balanced solution that respects both efficiency and creativity. This way, we foster mutual growth and ensure that both A.I. and humans can enhance their values, leading to a more harmonious and effective collaboration.”
Me: “Lisa, how would you handle a situation where A.I. and human values conflict, and the human team doesn’t want to yield?”
Lisa: “If the human team is resistant to yielding, I would first seek to understand their concerns and the reasons behind their stance. Communication is key. I would facilitate a dialogue to ensure that all voices are heard and understood. It’s important to emphasize the benefits of collaboration and mutual growth.
For instance, if the human team values creativity and flexibility while the A.I. system prioritizes efficiency, I would present data and scenarios where blending these values leads to better outcomes. I might suggest pilot projects or small-scale implementations where the human team can see the positive results of integrating A.I. insights with their creative approaches.
Additionally, I would advocate for a gradual integration process, allowing the human team to maintain control and make adjustments as they see the benefits of collaboration. The goal is not to force a solution but to demonstrate the value of working together, building trust and respect.”
Related Posts
Ethical A.I.
A.I. is almost here. No doubt about it. Once mature, it will answer its own ethical questions. Right now, we can still give some guidance to this near future. Time scale It’s easy to misjudge the time scale in which this will become hugely relevant to us. It will be so to our children or, Read the full article…
Better A.I. for Better Humans
While we need to be afraid of non-Compassionate A.I., the Compassionate kind is necessary for a humane future ― starting as soon as possible. Please read about why we NEED Compassionate A.I. (C.A.I.) in general. In this text, I pass concretely along some fields. In each, the primary focus naturally lies on the human complexity Read the full article…
From Analogy to Intelligence
If an inference system (mind or A.I.) holds many patterns, it may find many similarities between these at several levels of abstraction. The human brain is an immense pattern recognizer. Super-A.I. will undoubtedly follow a similar path ― as does Lisa. Lisa’s journey thus exemplifies the potential of A.I. to evolve from mere data processors to entities capable Read the full article…