The Purpose of Consciousness

May 1, 2023 Consciousness No Comments

Did nature give us consciousness to get us out of a non-conscious Garden of Eden? Or was it to make us the masters of the universe? Or both?

This text is pretty tentative. ‘Consciousness’ is not the clearest concept, nor is ‘purpose’ within natural evolution. Still, the issue can lead to some interesting thoughts.

Nature’s way

Of course, nature is no engineer who decides to plug in a new concoction one day. Evolution is always gradual, going from situation to slightly different situation, kind of feeling its way to exciting new territories.

Not the result, but the journey drives natural evolution. This way, nature puts drive into life as well as new possibilities in an ever-competitive stance. One way or another, the fittest (most adapted to circumstances) survives and thrives.

Consciousness doesn’t just make us happy.

On the contrary, it throws us out of the Garden, making us anticipate challenging things and then ruminate about them. Also, it gives us many possibilities for developing technologies that don’t always heighten our happiness.

Happiness isn’t the goal. Instead, it is one of the means attracting us to do stuff in a grander scheme.

Then why consciousness, for god’s sake?

Just that: competition with less conscious creatures.

But in a way, it wasn’t just the consciousness that made us more competitive, but rather the intelligence. In a world of natural drive, this happens to glide into the consciousness thing.

Theoretically, most of what we can do as animals with consciousness, we can do without.

And then, there is more.

As frequently, nature tinkers on something and stumbles into more — technically, an ‘exaptation.’

In our case, the intelligence drove the drive to a higher plane. In short, we became stress chickens, always on the lookout for more opportunities, which then again drove intelligence towards more, spilling over into culture, technology, etc. Drive and intelligence entered a vicious cycle.

Self-consciousness

This also evolved naturally and together with consciousness.

In our evolutionary path, no consciousness was possible without self-consciousness. Their natural purposes are the same. They may as well be looked upon as the same, the more so since the drive to thrive is always personal, self-oriented.

Is (self-)consciousness therefore inevitable?

This is, will any intelligent being in the universe necessarily also be (self-)conscious?

Logically, if it naturally evolves, it needs a drive to thrive to sustain its evolutionary process and not get extinct. Therefore, consciousness seems to be the necessary result of a necessary combination.

An artificial system doesn’t have a natural drive. However, abstractly seen, it, too, needs a purpose, one way or another. Otherwise, it can just as well pull out its own plugs. Without purpose, it operates entirely outside of life’s bubble.

For a very intelligent system therefore, to be conscious and to be alive are the same thing.

(I told you this text is tentative.)

Thus, while we are looking for the purpose of consciousness, it turns out that there is no consciousness without purpose, and purpose is also what makes an intelligent system a living thing, whether or not organically. If it works within its own goal, it fights entropy and is welcomed in the bubble of life, at least as I see it.

Dear reader, this is an invitation to you.

Do you also see it this way?

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Consciousness at the Boundary

The human mind is a dynamic, self-organizing field — fluid, layered, and perpetually in motion. In this, consciousness is not a fixed faculty or a control center. It is something more elusive and powerful: a moment-by-moment becoming where inner potential meets outer reality. This blog explores that dynamic boundary, and how Compassion and wisdom co-arise Read the full article…

How can I Be Conscious?

When it’s about oneself, the question becomes somewhat more ‘urgent’ than the formal consciousness question. One delves into the own experience and doesn’t readily find an answer. A more personal take may be warranted. Here are a few ideas that may help. A warning first. Being personal, the question might confuse some. The solid ground Read the full article…

The Being of Complex Patterns

Being doesn’t give rise to its own being. The being itself is just the being, even if one calls the second being differently — for instance, consciousness. The being of specific complex mental-neuronal patterns (in the brain, to make things simpler) doesn’t give rise to consciousness. They are consciousness itself. This implies that consciousness is Read the full article…

Translate »