Multiple Sclerosis
Since the first description of MS in 1877, psychological stress has been suggested as a trigger for exacerbations [Charcot, 1877]. Until recently, the clinical evidence for a causal relationship was weak.
A systematic meta-analysis from 2004 of 14 prospective studies found a significant relationship between the occurrence of stressful life events and a higher risk for relapses [Mohr et al., 2004].
In a prospective study, the presence of at least one long-term stressful life event was associated with three times the rate of exacerbations during the following 4 weeks [Mitsonis et al., 2008].
Another study describes the involvement of stress response systems in MS pathogenesis and progression in an integration of findings from molecular, cellular, experimental, clinical, and epidemiological research [Gold et al., 2005]. The authors point to the fact that several molecular studies in MS have found disruptions in the communication between the immune system and the two major stress response systems, the hypothalamo– pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis and the autonomic nervous system. Further investigation is clearly needed.
A 2019 study found that social stress and problems, mood swings, and sleep deprivation show an impact on the severity and recurrence of MS attacks [AlZahrani et al., 2019]. This study indicates an association between acute stress and relapse in MS but not the disease onset.
In the animal autoimmune encephalitis model of multiple sclerosis, the effects of stress on disease severity depend on various factors, including the type of stressor. The studies in humans relating stress to the risk of developing multiple sclerosis have found discordant results. Nevertheless, studies looking at the association of stress with relapses show a consistent association between stress and disease activity on brain MRI, where higher stress is associated with a higher risk of relapse. Reducing stress using stress management therapy results in a significant reduction in new brain lesions on MRI. However, this effect appears to be short-lived [Lovera et al., 2013].
Related Posts
One Autoimmune Disease or Many?
Autoimmune diseases are medically diverse, yet they often occur together in individuals and families and share important underlying mechanisms. This raises a deceptively simple question: how much of their diversity lies downstream of a more common process? If such commonality reaches far enough upstream, the implications may extend toward mind-related factors, coaching, and eventually prevention. Read the full article…
Whence the Rise of Autoimmune Disease?
Autoimmune diseases are spreading rapidly across the globe. In the US alone, estimates suggest that some 50 million people live with one or more of the more than a hundred autoimmune conditions, and worldwide, the prevalence is climbing year after year. This blog explores how diet, stress, meaning, and mind-body unity intersect to shed light Read the full article…
The Case of Cancer of the Prostate
The influence of the mind on cancer needs to be treated cautiously. In both directions, one should avoid wrong impressions stemming from personal/cultural biases rather than science. Also, one should respect the present-day state of scientific knowledge. Will the yet unknown be filled by the ‘bodyless mind’ or the ‘mindless body’? See also: Psychological impact Read the full article…