Problem- vs. Growth-Oriented in Mental Issues
This may lead to diametrically opposed ways of being and many misunderstandings.
As a mindset.
All of us continually encounter issues, from minor to life-size. This way, there is ample occasion to practice in seeing them either as problems or as invitations to grow.
Problems may lead more generally to stress; invitations to positive challenges ― no stress.
Yet, they are the same issues.
Outside ― inside
Looking at issues from the outside is more amenable to experiencing them as problems. One just wants to get rid of them.
By opening the packages, one may encounter fertile soil for growth.
The primary goal then may become very different.
Socio-politics
This is one way – of which there are many – to probably understand somewhat better the difference between a more progressive and a more conservative mindset.
Being more growth-oriented, one is also more focused on future possibilities. New challenges bring new solutions. So, should we not progress towards these better goods?
Being more problem-oriented, one focuses on the issues that need to be solved now. The problems themselves may be perceived as originating from disrespect for what already has been solved in the past. So, should we not conserve the goods that we already have?
Therapy
In Western medicine – and psychotherapy as its little sibling – the orientation is mostly an implicit mindset of problem-orientedness ― also known as solution-orientedness where the solution lies in diminishing the problem.
(This doesn’t necessarily denote political orientation.)
In many cases, this leads to symptomatic therapy also when it’s not ideal. [see: “Against Symptomatic Therapy”] The consequence may be a huge cost and little effectiveness. Moreover, people should know that this is a decision, not a necessity.
It should not be an implicit decision. It should be explicit as to patient consent. It may be, to the patient/client, the most important decision.
Problem vs. growth may lead to troubles in therapy
if people don’t appreciate the difference well enough. For instance, a patient/client may think that ‘attacking the problem’ is the goal of some therapy. With a caregiver having growth in mind, they talk past each other. A consequence may be that the client turns into a self-defeating orientation.
This may happen when one seeks psychotherapy in formal meditation.
AURELIS in this landscape
AURELIS is mainly growth-oriented, taking the problem (symptom, illness) as an entry for reaching the level where growth is possible. Diminishing a health-related problem is a side effect of this underlying endeavor.
AURELIS is also much broader than coaching.
It is a future-oriented mindset that – let’s hope so – is also rooted well enough in the past and the present.
Related Posts
About Human Depth
Everybody knows it, and nobody knows it. It is nowhere and everywhere As a youth, I used to read a lot of ‘elite literature’ that costs almost nothing for what it’s worth, has nothing to do with how-to-earn-money, and everything with depth. The writers are frequently found in history books of literature. What they wrote Read the full article…
Groups of Egos, Groups of Total Selves
Groups of egos may show empathy — primarily towards the ingroup, often at the cost of the outgroup. This selective empathy often reinforces division, creating a false sense of unity within the group while fostering hostility toward those outside it. Groups of total selves naturally lean toward a more Compassionate approach. The consequence is a Read the full article…
The Challenge of Changing one Thought
The degree of challenge depends on the thought. Deeply embedded thoughts are more challenging to change. The difference between deep and superficial-level thoughts is crucial. Embeddedness Surface-level thoughts are more Lego-like. You can, so to speak, quickly take out one small block and put in another. Of course, there are no pure Lego-like mental blocks Read the full article…