Problem- vs. Growth-Oriented in Mental Issues
This may lead to diametrically opposed ways of being and many misunderstandings.
As a mindset.
All of us continually encounter issues, from minor to life-size. This way, there is ample occasion to practice in seeing them either as problems or as invitations to grow.
Problems may lead more generally to stress; invitations to positive challenges ― no stress.
Yet, they are the same issues.
Outside ― inside
Looking at issues from the outside is more amenable to experiencing them as problems. One just wants to get rid of them.
By opening the packages, one may encounter fertile soil for growth.
The primary goal then may become very different.
Socio-politics
This is one way – of which there are many – to probably understand somewhat better the difference between a more progressive and a more conservative mindset.
Being more growth-oriented, one is also more focused on future possibilities. New challenges bring new solutions. So, should we not progress towards these better goods?
Being more problem-oriented, one focuses on the issues that need to be solved now. The problems themselves may be perceived as originating from disrespect for what already has been solved in the past. So, should we not conserve the goods that we already have?
Therapy
In Western medicine – and psychotherapy as its little sibling – the orientation is mostly an implicit mindset of problem-orientedness ― also known as solution-orientedness where the solution lies in diminishing the problem.
(This doesn’t necessarily denote political orientation.)
In many cases, this leads to symptomatic therapy also when it’s not ideal. [see: “Against Symptomatic Therapy”] The consequence may be a huge cost and little effectiveness. Moreover, people should know that this is a decision, not a necessity.
It should not be an implicit decision. It should be explicit as to patient consent. It may be, to the patient/client, the most important decision.
Problem vs. growth may lead to troubles in therapy
if people don’t appreciate the difference well enough. For instance, a patient/client may think that ‘attacking the problem’ is the goal of some therapy. With a caregiver having growth in mind, they talk past each other. A consequence may be that the client turns into a self-defeating orientation.
This may happen when one seeks psychotherapy in formal meditation.
AURELIS in this landscape
AURELIS is mainly growth-oriented, taking the problem (symptom, illness) as an entry for reaching the level where growth is possible. Diminishing a health-related problem is a side effect of this underlying endeavor.
AURELIS is also much broader than coaching.
It is a future-oriented mindset that – let’s hope so – is also rooted well enough in the past and the present.
Related Posts
The Humanistic Failure: Neglecting the Total Human Being
Humanism set out to liberate humanity from dogma, superstition, and oppressive structures. It championed reason, science, and progress as guiding forces for a better world. And yet, in its pursuit of rationality and external progress, modern humanism has largely ignored the deeper layers of human existence. It has focused on intellectual enlightenment but has failed Read the full article…
The ‘Self’ in East and West
What do we mean when we say ‘I’? The East and the West have given very different answers to that question, often so different that they seem to talk past each other. At the same time, both are wrestling with the same underlying problem: mistaking the surface for the whole. This blog explores how the Read the full article…
Apollonian – Dionysian – Odyssean
In therapy/coaching and in everyday life, one may be more Apollonian oriented or more Dionysian, or see it all as an adventurous journey. Nietzschean dichotomy Nietzsche used ancient Greek mythology to characterize two different mindsets in culture, art, and individual: Apollonian: more orderly, yet illusory and socially constructed Dionysian: more passionate, at the same time Read the full article…