Gender Equivalidity
People can be deemed equal in worth without any bit of need to adhere to one mold. Crucial is value, not sameness.
Gender equality?
Men and women are not equal at the outside, nor at the inside ― least of all at the mental side. Therefore, the term gender equality sounds forced. The more one goes into genders, the less it makes sense.
Trying to make them somehow equal – for instance, for fear of disrespect – may end in not respecting any individual for what he/she truly and naturally is. This way, any person gets excessively pushed into a mold of equality.
There is little respect in making a circle by breaking a square.
Equivalidity
There is more respect in making a circle by empowering a square (or triangle). This starts by valuing the square for what he is before molding him into something else like a circle.
Seeing equal value in different people is the challenge, not asking them to be the same for the sake of equal value.
Young, old, black, green, male, or any other gender ― these characteristics should not be the source for seeing different value. In equal validity, people have all freedom to be different ― or equal.
Whence the striving for equality?
At least in some cases, this may come from a rather mechanistic view of the human being. If genders can be readily made equal, that means the in-depth differences – including many subtle ones – are not so crucial, and a lot of what people feel to be gender-related can be dismissed.
This feels like making things less or unimportant. In this manner, the equality in value gets realized by making everything less valuable, at the same time more interchangeable.
On the other hand, of course, gender non-equality can also be a mold used by some culture to divide the sexes and subdue one more than the other. A reaction to this molding should not be the installation of another mold. That would be like jumping from one box into another box.
What degree of non-equality is optimal?
The question is not readily answerable.
Well, yes, that’s what I can say about it. I guess the only reasonable answer can be given at an individual level. Here, it is an ethical question. Aurelian ethics may be some guideline.
What is sure – and fascinating – is that it can always remain a challenge.
Wild orchids
Wild orchids have an individually independent attitude concerning gender. That doesn’t mean they strive for equality; quite the contrary.
No two natural orchids – the flowers – are the same. They’re all pretty different, which makes them more beautiful and interesting. It’s the same in the human case.
Wild orchids are free ― no need for any degree of equality to attain natural equivalidity. They are spontaneously themselves, respecting themselves and others plainly as they are.
Nothing human is unimportant.
Everything human is infinitely valuable if only correctly treated.
Related Posts
Work-Life (in the) Balance
Work-life balance may not be the best start if it brings more emphasis on a divide between both. For ages and until relatively recently people had only a ‘life’. ‘Work’ was what you had to do to stay alive within that life. At times, one had to work really hard… still it wasn’t ‘work’ as Read the full article…
Sowing Hatred
Sowing hatred leads to aggression and more hatred. An additional problem is that this happens mainly through subconceptual ways. So to speak, ‘underground.’ Like in nature, seeds that you sow develop underground in such a way that a lot has happened before one can see the result appear above the ground. With the seeds of Read the full article…
Three Dangers of Freemasonry
Depth needs effort. Lots of effort ― even more so if one thinks to make enough effort already. There are many forms of pseudo-depth, especially when shrouded in secrecy, Looking for a combination of depth and rationality, a few years ago, I ventured into the world of freemasonry. A lot of information about it is Read the full article…