Fate

October 26, 2021 Cognitive Insights, Sociocultural Issues No Comments

Accepting one’s fate may be very beautiful if it comes from deep inside. Any other kind is worth little.

An animal runs away from a predator.

The predator grabs it. The animal struggles and dies. It all happens in a short time. Until the last moment, there is little question of fate as far as the dying animal is concerned.

Humans die much longer. They also yearn and suffer much longer. They know fate, which they may accept or not.

Thinking about fate comes with thinking consciously.

In all this, the only Compassionate stance feels to me the following:

Fate must be free.

This is, nobody should coerce anyone else to ‘accept his fate.’

For instance, during a pandemic, the choice may be between either the protection of old people or the freedom of younger people to socialize. Here, the argument ‘accept your fate’ is no good argument, as it never is.

Yet, the choice needs to be made ― here as in many other occasions in which people live together in a society.

Thus, tragedy exists.

This doesn’t lie in the coercion to accept one’s fate but in accepting that fate exists. It is part of the deal, part of the gift of consciousness that we received from nature.

It throws one out of a garden, but only as an illusion.

In reality, fate may be the most Compassionate issue,

but only in freedom. In coercion, there is no fate, but only coercion ― as in “You must accept your fate.” You see, what’s the difference with “You must accept my coercion”?

In free fate, there is the free choice to accept one’s fate, as there is also the free choice to keep hoping, or Hoping. [see: “About Hope”]

Both may be immensely beautiful.

Accepting fate

This is what makes it beautiful to me. Then again, ‘acceptance’ in this is crucially challenging. [see: “The Tough Concept of ‘Acceptance’”]

For one thing, it is incompatible with ‘making one accept something.’

It all hangs quite together, doesn’t it?

Meanwhile, decisions need to be taken; policies need to be made.

Making them with Compassion makes a difference for everyone.

Is it possible to die with a smile?

Is it possible to postpone living with a smile?

Absolutely, and more: both are worth living and dying for.

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

The Challenge of Changing one Thought

The degree of challenge depends on the thought. Deeply embedded thoughts are more challenging to change. The difference between deep and superficial-level thoughts is crucial. Embeddedness Surface-level thoughts are more Lego-like. You can, so to speak, quickly take out one small block and put in another. Of course, there are no pure Lego-like mental blocks Read the full article…

Certainty Through Doubt

We often equate certainty with the absence of doubt, imagining it as a solid foundation that keeps us safe from ambiguity. But what if the deepest and most resilient certainty emerges not by avoiding doubt, but by fully embracing it? This blog explores a paradox: true certainty requires doubt. Doubt, far from being an obstacle, Read the full article…

The Story of ‘I’

Animals have an ‘I’ from the moment they know the difference between moving and sensing that something else is moving. In terms of evolution, this ‘I’ came way before ‘ego’. Say: some 700 million years before which is according to very subjective criteria of course. One could argue for much longer. Weirdness of ‘I’ Many Read the full article…

Translate »