A Life is a Life

November 18, 2023 Sociocultural Issues No Comments

Whether an American, a European, or an African life, a Russian or a Ukrainian life, a Palestinian or an Israeli life — any life.

This assertion is so logically obvious and, at the same time, so emotionally contentious. Yet, especially every world leader should take it at heart.

Beyond small-circle empathy

Getting beyond this is challenging for many people.

This used to be unproblematic in the past, with little means of knowing what was going on in the wider world. Meanwhile, it has become more problematic because of the tremendously enhanced means to know better. To say “we didn’t know,“ is no longer appropriate. Almost always, we can know if we care — huge difference! This way, small-circle vs. large-circle empathy has become a choice and a responsibility.

Every life

Ignorance may not only lie in a factual not-knowing. It may also lie in not grasping the facts at a deeper level. One example is not validating a life as what it really is — objectifying some lives as insignificant pieces in a global puzzle.

One may value a life as to how deeply one feels personally related. This makes no sense except for small-circle empathy.

Every life is a life.

This has nothing to do with how one emotionally feels about it — in principle.

And then again, it has, for being the only decent way to think about it. No culture makes any life less worthy, nor any status or amount of money, nor any clothing or book, nor any age, illness, or addiction.

Nor the life of a loved one versus another

This is somewhat more challenging, of course. By the way, the ‘loved ones’ include yourself.

If there is a choice, choose love. Love has no price. Still, this doesn’t mean any life is worth less or more. A life still is a life. The only reason for your choice is your love — no other distinction.

That makes love additionally special.

Nor the life of an enemy versus no-enemy

This may be even more challenging to some, of course ― especially in wartime.

You don’t need to hate the enemy to do the right thing.

You don’t need to devalue his life to do the right thing.

You don’t need to see the enemy as your enemy to do the right thing.

As it happens, soldiers from ‘the wrong side’ may encounter each other after the war and become good friends. In such cases, the lack of logic is not in the friendship.

What about quality of life?

That should be decided only by the person himself. Even so, proper coaching can dramatically change the picture.

It’s tempting to reduce ethical questions to numbers: X x Y = Z. In matters of life, this doesn’t fit for the following reason:

Infinitely worthy

You too — are worth an infinity — as a total being — every minute.

A mere-ego that takes possession of this is prone to immense hubris and resulting mayhem. This has played a role in many worldly affairs – starting wars, etc. – usually ending in a fall as steep as the hubris itself.

So, please consider that the ‘infinitely worthy’ idea is a challenging one. Nevertheless, it’s the only viable one, the one also of self-Compassion (in empathy beyond) and, eventually, global Compassion.

Life is a beautiful thing.

Life.

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

DailyTwinkles to Planetarianism

The DailyTwinkles project forms an ambitious AURELIS subproject, reaching and connecting people in forty different languages. The aim is to support people to connect in-depth. In accord with the AURELIS philosophy, people are invited to value a combination of rationality and depth – each without detracting from the other – across cultural borders, toward planetarianism. Read the full article…

No to Wokism, Yes to Gentleness

In another blog, I define wokism as woke fundamentalism, being an abuse of wokeness as a positive striving to fully respect and tolerate people of many different kinds. I am very woke, but not at all a wokist. Woke should be gentle. Without gentleness, woke tends to fall into the opposite, being intolerance. Woke is Read the full article…

Societal Inner Dissociation and Radicalization

Radicalization – the process by which individuals adopt extreme political, social, or religious ideologies – poses a significant threat to societal cohesion and global security. One of the underlying forces driving radicalization is Societal Inner Dissociation (SID). The present blog explores how SID contributes to radicalization and suggests ways to address this issue to promote Read the full article…

Translate »