Jesus was a Humanist

June 1, 2024 Open Religion No Comments

Jesus’ teachings, if ever He lived and as recorded in the Gospels, emphasize Compassion, tolerance, and care for the oppressed, the poor, and the marginalized. Also, He was a steadfast advocate for peace and understanding, values that are central to humanism.

From a deeper perspective

From a deeper perspective, Jesus’ emphasis on inner transformation and the significance of Compassion reflects a profound call to recognize the inherent worthiness of oneself and every person. This inner transformation is a journey of aligning the self with universal values that nurture individual and collective well-being ― transcending ego-centeredness as never before.

In this way, Jesus embodies what could be considered the essence of Humanism: a profound concern for the dignity and well-being of all, grounded in love and respect.

Interpreting Jesus’ life and teachings through this lens reveals Him as a figure who transcends religious boundaries, providing guidance that is universally relevant to the human condition. Thus, Jesus’ message is an open invitation to deeper human connection.

And yet Christianity and Humanism are frequently pitched against each other.

Christianity and Humanism are often seen as at odds because they are rooted in different foundations. Yet, does this divergence truly matter?”

Here are the odds:

  • Christianity is based on faith in divine revelation, particularly the belief in God, the divinity of Jesus, and the teachings of the Bible. It emphasizes spiritual salvation, moral absolutes, and the authority of religious doctrine.
  • Humanism, on the other hand, typically focuses on human reason, ethics, and the inherent dignity of all people without necessarily invoking the divine. It often promotes a secular worldview, prioritizing human experience, science, and individual autonomy over religious or spiritual considerations.

Jesus was a person of His time. Everyone talked about divine revelation, faith, spiritual salvation, religious doctrine, etc.

In today’s world, Jesus Himself would have come out as a true Humanist.

Reading deeply into His teachings with these terms in mind, one can sense that He intended them to be understood profoundly from the beginning. How could it be otherwise? Jesus was no surface guy who took any literal – if that ever existed – meaning for granted in anything.

Jesus would know that a human person’s depth is at least so deep that it ‘doesn’t matter anymore.’ However, He would also know that if the terms are used at the surface level, they lack all meaning. They only strike a chord when engaged with at a profound level.

It appears that, at times, many who identify as Christians or Humanists don’t engage with these concepts in their full depth nowadays, leading to misunderstandings and conflicts that might not align with the deeper message of Jesus as discussed here. In this light, it seems they may be missing the deeper essence of these values, perhaps prioritizing comfort over a more profound understanding.

Jesus didn’t really search for comfort, did He?

This combination shows that Jesus might be seen as the greatest Humanist.

He dared to be vulnerable to the core ― not out of weakness but out of Compassion. Humanists have every reason to do the same nowadays. It’s not something of a bygone age.

Most vehement shouters – in this and many other occasions – seem to lack the time for such a mundane issue.

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Does ‘Salam’ Mean Submission or Peace?

To me, there are two fundamentally different kinds of Muslims according to this distinction. ‘Salam,’ as in Islam and Muslim ― same root, also as ‘sjalom’ in Hebrew. I intend no denigration of Islam or any other religion. Every religion is worthwhile if one dares to fall deeply inside. Otherwise, it’s just a sociocultural happening. Read the full article…

Is AURELIS a Sect?

… in that case I would be a guru, with all its negative connotations… No, thank you, I would rather not. Originally ‘guru’ simply means ‘teacher’. Then I think: a good ‘teacher’ strives to educate his ‘students’ so that they become better than himself. In that case, there might be an element of truth in Read the full article…

Opening Religion

This is, as I see it, mainly to be done through opening related concepts. ‘Opening concepts’ One should see this rationally / conceptually AND, even mainly, sub-conceptually: meditatively. This brings a difference in methodology as well as in results. Both are to be seen much more as ‘creative’. As any of my writing, actually. A Read the full article…

Translate »