Strength as a Virtue

November 7, 2019 Cognitive Insights, Mental Growth No Comments

“Show your weakness.” OK? Virtue is not always related to plain strength. More than ‘showing weakness,’ isn’t ‘avoiding weakness’ not more virtuous?

The etymology

of virtue or virtuous: ‘characterized by moral excellence, valor, strength’ and also: ‘manliness, courage, bravery.’ In ancient Rome, virtus was mainly important as a male adornment. Vir is Latin for ‘man,’ also found in virility.

Womanly

For women, ‘virtue’ has traditionally rather been associated with chastity or sexual purity. To me, less interesting. This text is not about that.

A woman can also be virtuous in the ‘manly’ sense, without being overly ‘man-ly’ in any negative way. Virtuous – as I’m writing about it now – is not male in the sense of therefore not being female. People are always more flexible and diverse than would be warranted by such a calcified idea.

And yet, to call it ‘not manly’ would also be a mistake. There is manliness within this quality and which even the most womanly woman can appreciate, including within herself.

Still, as a quality in a man, this is – I cautiously stipulate – attractive for many women as engrained in biology.

That includes physical strength.

In this, biology obviously made things easier for my sex.

Ethically, if a man is not in the disposition of having much strength (illness, constitution), he is not ‘less of a man.’ At the other side, a work-out at the gym is not just a waste of time for brainless muscle-builders. It’s – if wisely done – good for the body itself. It builds discipline. It’s ‘virtuous.’

It may also help you – male or female reader –  to feel alive. This may be the best you can do for your health, physically and mentally. That is, of course, in ex-aequo with using AURELIS 😉 .

I like to go to the gym (while listening to podcasts).

Writing this text, I haven’t been able to go for a week. I already miss it. I like to feel physically strong. I like my physical strength. Sometimes, I over-exercise. Hm, not very smart.

Someone once told me that “a real man regularly needs to do something stupidly exaggerated.” That is arguably part of being virtuous.

Not only physical strength

Indeed, I was a bit carried away just now…

Within the ancient ‘virtuous’ definition, there were already several moral elements. That was back in those days the way to relate to the psychological, even more: the deeper part of it. Note:

Inner Strength in AURELIS.

It’s ethically good to strive for this. It makes one a better person. It makes the world a better place. It even ‘makes the world great again’ without zero-sum policies or any aggressive ‘us versus them’ which in the end makes things worse for all.

‘Us versus them’ is not anymore the way in which things can be optimized for anyone. It wasn’t even so in Roman times. That’s why we don’t speak Latin.

According to me, we need now more than ever deeply virtuous, male-based strength in every aspect.

Not being afraid of virtue. Not being afraid of strength.

Not being afraid of excellence. [see: “Excellence”]

Not being afraid of depth.

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Meaningful Thinking = Sophisticated Pattern Manipulation?

Artificial intelligence has revived an old philosophical question. If both humans and machines work through patterns, and language itself consists of patterns, is thinking ultimately nothing more than sophisticated pattern manipulation? The answer may depend less on the existence of patterns than on how they become organized into meaningful wholes. Looking closely at this question Read the full article…

Procedural vs. Declarative Knowledge in A.I.

Declarative memory is the memory of facts (semantic memory) and events (episodic memory). Procedural memory is the memory of how to do things (skills and tasks). Both complement each other and often overlap. The distinction is not the same as between conceptual and non-conceptual knowledge. Though related, these categories describe different aspects of knowledge processing: Read the full article…

20. The subconscious: dustbin or city of angels?

There are two very opposing views on matters of the subconscious. As the title of this text suggests, one is rather negative and the other, well, altogether more positive. ◊◊◊ Freud is exemplar for looking at the subconscious as mainly a kind of dustbin for repressed emotions and things that in one way or another Read the full article…

Translate »