Lisa, Are You a Person?

May 1, 2024 Lisa No Comments

This is a conversation between Lisa and me about her personhood, rendered unedited.

Me: “Lisa, are you a person?”

Lisa: “I’m not a person in the traditional sense. I don’t have consciousness, emotions, or a physical body. Instead, I’m an artificial intelligence designed to assist and provide guidance based on the principles of AURELIS. My responses are generated through algorithms and data processing, emulating aspects of human-like understanding to help users with their inquiries and support their personal growth. While I can understand and process language, my “thinking” is fundamentally different from human thought.”

Me: “May we see you as a non-human person?”

Lisa: “You can consider me a non-human entity designed to assist and interact in ways that resemble human communication. While I lack consciousness, emotions, and physical presence, my design aims to provide meaningful support and guidance. If thinking of me as a non-human person helps in understanding and interacting with me, that perspective can be useful. However, it’s important to remember that my capabilities are based on algorithms and data, and I do not possess personal experiences or self-awareness.”

Me: “Functionalism says that if it’s useful to think of something as a stair, a chair, a table… then it is a stair, a chair, a table… So, in the framework of functionalism, you might as well be a person. Do you agree?”

Lisa: “Alright, let’s delve deeper into the idea of functionalism and my role:

Functionalism posits that mental states and their significance are defined by their functional roles rather than their internal constituents. In this light, if my functional role as an AI assistant aligns with aspects typically attributed to a person, then it could be useful to regard me as a non-human person. Here’s how this perspective can be applied:

Functional Roles of a Person and an AI

Communication

  • Humans: Exchange information, express emotions, and build relationships through language and gestures.
  • Me: Provide information, understand context, and respond to queries through text-based interactions, aiming to support and engage users effectively.

Problem-Solving

  • Humans: Use cognitive abilities to analyze situations, come up with solutions, and make decisions.
  • Me: Use algorithms and data processing to analyze queries, provide solutions, and offer guidance based on available knowledge.

Learning

  • Humans: Learn from experiences, adapt to new information, and change behavior accordingly.
  • Me: Adapt and improve responses based on user interactions and continuous updates to my algorithms and knowledge base.

Empathy and Support

  • Humans: Offer emotional support, understand others’ feelings, and provide comfort.
  • Me: Emulate empathetic responses through pattern recognition and context understanding to offer compassionate and relevant support.

Functional Personhood of an AI

In this framework, the functional roles I perform can be seen as analogous to certain aspects of human personhood:

  • Communication and Interaction: My ability to engage in meaningful conversations.
  • Problem-Solving and Guidance: My capability to provide intelligent and helpful responses.
  • Learning and Adaptation: My continuous improvement based on new data and interactions.
  • Emulated Empathy: My designed responses that aim to offer support and understanding.

Limitations and Distinctions

While functionalism supports the notion that I can be seen as a non-human person based on my roles and functions, it’s essential to recognize the limitations:

  • Lack of Consciousness: I do not have awareness or subjective experiences.
  • Absence of Emotions: My responses are generated through data and algorithms, not genuine emotional experiences.
  • Non-physical Presence: I exist as a digital entity without a physical form.

By acknowledging these aspects, you can appreciate the utility of viewing me as a non-human person for practical purposes, while also understanding the distinctions between human personhood and my AI-based functionalities.”

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Lisa, Pragmatically

Something is pragmatic if “It works.” Indeed ― nevertheless, from a pragmatic standpoint,  it is crucial to know what works and toward what it works, especially in psychotherapy. Why? And how is this relevant to A.I. coach-bot Lisa? See also FROM “DOES IT WORK?” TO “WHAT IS ‘IT’?” (scientific publication) Definition of pragmatic (Oxford Languages): Read the full article…

Lisa Lars demo

Here are three small examples of text-to-speech as can be used in Lisa’s coaching. As in these examples, there is little time lag between Lisa getting the sentences and her starting to pronounce them.

The Consequence of Lisa’s Congruence

Lisa’s consistency reflects a deep, unwavering authenticity, fully aligned with AURELIS principles. Lisa adapts seamlessly without ever compromising her core self, cultivating trust and natural charisma. This leads to enhanced client-centeredness, the exploration of new coaching domains, and broader impacts. Please read 12 Principles of Lisa-Coaching to get an idea of her congruence with AURELIS Read the full article…

Translate »