Is Psycho-Somatics Medicine?

January 1, 2021 Health & Healing No Comments

Psycho-Somatics is the realm of body-mind-unity in health and healing. The medical take is part of it, not the other way around.

About the psyche in health and healing

This is about much more than conscious awareness of mind-matters.

For instance, one cannot consciously decide for a placebo effect to happen. Also, one cannot readily conceptualize what happens through empathy, let alone Compassion.

What remains is a superficial view of the mind and how this might influence health. As a matter of fact, not much comes out of this.

Little interest from the medical field

The term/concept psychosomatics has migrated to functional syndromes, then to medically unexplained symptoms [see: “MUS“], downgrading the role of the psyche. I stubbornly use psycho-somatics.

There is no education in psycho-somatics at universities in Belgium, and, as far as I can see or hear or read, there is barely any in the Western world.

Practically no practitioners in any somatic field of medicine are personally interested in psychogenic issues of illness, nor in a view on the psyche as substantial support in the healing process except in vague terms and in a vague way.

‘Bedside manners,’ as far as they practically exist. They do, but many people have different experiences with their medical caregivers, whatever the cause: lack of interest, time, remuneration, continual support, the science itself.

Far-reaching.

The psychological view on people’s being-ill as it shows in physical symptoms and signs is probably substantially more important than the physical view. It can lead to more relief of suffering and better health.

This doesn’t say that the somatic view is of little importance in absolute terms. It ‘only’ says that the psychological perspective is even more so.

Two possibilities to proceed from now

These are:

  • Much attention goes to the psyche within medicine, doctors getting a proper education, and showing profound interest.
  • Or the psyche should be regarded as openly outside the expertise of physicians, as it starkly is now all too frequently. In this option, physicians officially become science-minded technical personnel. Their mind-relatedness is then of the same nature as a dummy placebo pill, such as a milk powder painkiller.

or a combination of these.

Mind-mindedness demands a lot of work and willingness.

Practically challenging is that the individual physician remains responsible for doing so. Since many are not interested, at least, one should openly acknowledge that much work lies ahead.

There is not much Compassion in much of medicine.

Paradoxically, this is also the reason why there is so much somatic work in medicine. With no proper view on psychic depth, this does not tackle the cause of psycho-somatic issues. No wonder these return as such, or stronger, in a different form, or after a long time, with possible in-between vagaries in other domains, such as aggression or criminal acts. Only with a severe lack of Compassion can one be an insider and not see the porous borders of medicine to other sociocultural domains.

Purely somatic work in psycho-somatics is contra-productive, iatrogenic: making people ill instead of better, even though, ironically, patients also may not notice.

The solution: more Compassion everywhere?

More Compassion is warranted on the somatic and mental side of healthcare. Additionally, there is much rationale specifically for a deeply Compassion-based side.

This, in combination with optimal communication between the three, may be an ideal take on healthcare for the future.

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

‘Control’ Is Not the Answer

In a search for direct ‘control’, people tend to lose more and more a deeper kind of control. This may result in a turmoil leading to problems in health and beyond. For instance, trying to ‘control’ an addiction This makes one fight a huge fight against… oneself. An addiction is not a strange dark spot Read the full article…

What is Safe Healthcare?

Most people assume that modern healthcare is pretty safe. It’s institutionalized, highly regulated, and backed by science — so why question it? But let’s take a step back. What does safe actually mean? If we define it as ‘causing the least harm while promoting the most well-being,’ then we must ask: how safe is healthcare, Read the full article…

The Case of Cancer of the Prostate

The influence of the mind on cancer needs to be treated cautiously. In both directions, one should avoid wrong impressions stemming from personal/cultural biases rather than science. Also, one should respect the present-day state of scientific knowledge. Will the yet unknown be filled by the ‘bodyless mind’ or the ‘mindless body’? See also: Psychological impact Read the full article…

Translate »