AURELIS in Healthcare Context

March 11, 2021 AURELIS, Health & Healing No Comments

Can AURELIS be a part of healthcare as one corner of a triangle with the client/patient central to the happening?

The ‘deeper mind’ as domain

Many people with persistent mind-related problems, including psycho-somatic issues, do not seek professional help. With AURELIS – including Lisa [see: “Lisa“] – they have additional options while staying totally within the domain of rationality. [see: “AURELIS USP: ‘100% Rationality, 100% Depth’“]

AURELIS = mental hygiene

In my view, broadly two groups of nonspecific factors in this hygienic striving are placebogenic and empathic:

  • Placebo: In AURELIS, the (placebo-less) ‘placebo’-effect is reached openly and directly ― also depending on the user. The endeavor is to be as open as possible by way of unveiled autosuggestion. AurelisOnLine sessions are profoundly autosuggestive invitations to change from inside. Note the difference with being changed.
  • Empathy: AURELIS coaching methods are applied by the coach towards him/herself. The ‘instrument’ towards the coachee is the open empathic coach. [see: “Compassionate Goal of Coaching“] Open empathy emerges from inside, while the term ‘therapy’ denotes products/methods being applied to clients/patients from outside.

In a mental-hygienic (AURELIS) setting, both are about Inner Strength [see: “Inner Strength“] emerging in an open and profoundly ethical way. [see: “Five Aurelian Values“]

Triangle

This drawing also shows three possible entries into psycho-somatic healthcare:

AURELIS can be used in concert with the client/patient, the psychologist, and the physician. All roads are possible. For instance, in the case of chronic low back pain:

  • A patient goes to his physician, who does some tests and prescribes a painkiller.
  • The physician also points the patient to AURELIS and gives him a subscription. The patient comes home and can immediately start with AurelisOnLine sessions.
  • After a while, the patient can also ask for video coaching. After such coaching, the coach provides a summary. The client can decide to let this be sent to the physician.
  • When consulting the physician again, they decide what to do with the painkillers or other medical procedures. The patient can continue using AurelisOnLine and maybe talk with his coach and/or Lisa.
  • The physician may gradually reduce the painkillers, according to the principle of ‘gentle slope:’

The gentle slope

This is generally crucial within AURELIS.

For instance:

  • A gentle diminishment of medication ― AURELIS getting in place as part of the safety net, and at the pace of the patient.
  • It is recommended to use AURELIS before diminishing the medication.
  • The patient may feel additional pain relief through AURELIS.
  • The diminishment of medication should not lead to more pain, also not temporarily.

This principle of the gentle slope is generally applicable when using AURELIS. The gentleness is needed for natural growth to happen ― such as the use of AURELIS towards quitting smoking. This preferably starts a while before quitting day, giving time and support to grow beyond the addiction.

The gentle slope is relevant to many domains. Also, it is appropriate to the whole domain of psycho-somatic healthcare towards the future.

I hope this will happen gently, yet strongly indeed ― no need for hurting anyone.

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Three Waves of Attention

Where there is life, there is attention. Where there is attention, there is life. AURELIS integrates rationality and poetry in a specific view of human being. It brings together body and mind, East and West, past, present and future. Most of all, it unifies conscious thinking and the subconscious mind as understood in modern cognitive Read the full article…

From Common Factors to AURELIS

If only common factors work, then only common factors should we teach and reimburse. Does this point towards AURELIS? You bet. The science According to a ton of scientific studies, clearly and robustly, psychotherapeutic methods are ineffective. This may be hard to swallow, so I repeat. Lots of studies and even many meta-analyses show no Read the full article…

Enlightenment, Kant, AURELIS, Growth

It’s time to bring things together. This is according to me the only way forward. ‘Western Enlightenment’ points to a historical period from +/- 1650 onwards, till +/- first part of 19th century. It was multifaceted, to say the least, and came in several waves from ‘moderate’ to ‘radical’… to even ‘totalitarian’ (à la Robespierre). Read the full article…

Translate »