Pied Pipers of Hamelin
There are already more than enough pied pipers of Hamelin.
~~~~~~
One metric ton of so called ‘depth’
is easier to fathom than an ounce of real stuff
whatever that may be.
You don’t have to look like a spirit of the forest to bring depth.
There is no harm in it, but it really is not necessary.
Your words do not have to sound like those of a spirit of the forest.
There is no harm in it, but it really is not necessary.
But: look at a real spirit of the forest.
Do you see the trees?
Can you hear the streamlet where he says goodbye to the day, every evening?
Can you feel the black night between the trees
in which the void comes to visit him with so many pieces of wisdom?
Can you hear the moss that tells him
how gentle this world really is?
A spirit of the forest doesn’t shout to the moon to show how the moon shouts back.
He shouts when no one sees it, not even he himself
and the moon whispers back in the rustling of leaves.
A spirit of the forest spreads himself
to protect all that lives in the forest
against so-called ‘depth’.
Related Posts
Inside-Out is Nature’s Way
From inside out is how life actually grows. A tree doesn’t start by collecting branches. It unfolds from a seed. The brain doesn’t get built like a machine — it self-organizes through inner patterns, layer by layer. The same is true of real change, healing, and meaning. In What ‘From Inside Out’ Really Means, this Read the full article…
The Confusing Confounding Factors in Science
‘Confounding factors’ sound like a technical nuisance, something to be corrected and forgotten. Yet in many areas of science, especially when humans are involved, this term quietly shapes what is deemed central and what is pushed aside. This blog explores how confounding can clarify — but also mislead when depth is mistaken for interference. Sometimes, Read the full article…
Depth Makes the Teacher
Okay. I immediately ask myself whom I am actually writing this for. It is striking that people, if they start listening to someone who wants to gain a better ‘understanding’ of something, tend to some kind of expectation where that ‘someone’ should fit in. Would C.G. Jung talk about an archetype? He probably would. Different Read the full article…