How to Keep the Empathy

September 9, 2021 Empathy - Compassion No Comments

The COVID-era has profoundly shaken many people. This has enhanced an upsurge of interest in empathy. However, may this be a passing phenomenon? What can one do to make it more durable?

About empathy

[see: “Landscape of Empathy”]

The term ‘empathy’ – unlike Compassion – does not necessarily relate to depth. [see: “Compassion = Empathy-Beyond“]

This may be one reason why empathy is an easier concept to find support in the business world. ‘Depth’ may seem not very competitive. Of course, the contrary is true. [see: “The Why of Corporate Compassion”]

Without depth, empathy will not endure by itself.

At the workplace, can empathy not be kept by pressure or policy?

Nope. Moreover, policies tend to be designed as if employees are evil abusers who need to be kept in check by ever more intricate rules and regulations. The few abusers are thus kept in line. Many others get demotivated.

This is not an empathic stance to start with. So, can one enforce empathy by bringing it from the reverse attitude?

I don’t think so. It might look like it for just a while.

Depth is always challenging.

There is no doubt about this. However, it is also necessary to be effective and durable.

In-depth, people need to be seen as organic creatures, part of nature in which everything continually grows. Nothing stays the same. Things come and go in an endless succession of individual (un-divided) finality.

Meanwhile, the durability of nature lies within depth itself ― the broad and profound view. Acceptance of the natural way brings insight into end-value. What stays is what is valuable. In the human case, this is empathy-beyond, the profound feeling that what is good for others is good for oneself.

The mother, for instance, may feel this for her child. Much broader, anyone may feel this for others far-away in place and even in the future.

Sustainability

[see: “Sustainability through Compassion”]

Plants do not grow in the air. They need soil. Their roots do an indispensable job in the invisible world below the surface.

The same with people. They do not grow in thin air without depth. Below the surface of our consciously conceptual mind, we find a subconceptual soil. [see: “About ‘Subconceptual’”] Without this, there is no growing ― even no mental life at all.

Since empathy is a prime mental competence, it cannot endure a state of being dissociated from one’s own subconceptual depth. There is only empathy-less mayhem. [see: “Inner Dissociation is NEVER OK”]

So, in order to keep the empathy,

we need to find our way towards empathy-beyond.

If not, then even a COVID-era will not have a long-lasting positive effect. Instead, a superficial kind of empathy will wax and wane. The pendulum’s motion will not become a path that has been taken for good. It might even reverse with a backlash. That is, people who don’t like or understand empathy so much will point at ‘it’ as something that has no effective ground.

Indeed. Therefore, let’s give it the ground it needs.

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

From Mirror Neurons to Mirror Brain

Seeing the brain as a ‘mirror brain,’ we can see how empathy plays a crucial role in many things mind-related. Empathy is not an add-on. The human thinking is basically empathic. This is an excerpt from [see: “The Journey Towards Compassionate AI.”]. (This blog text is no easy reading.) Some researchers see mirror neurons as Read the full article…

The Concept ‘Kindness For the Total Person’

Kindness… is probably the first word that comes to mind with reference to AURELIS. E.g. if you want to explain to anyone what AURELIS is about. It is also very important when you are doing an AURELIS session for example. The aim here is to allow you to be friendly to yourself. It’s not pushing Read the full article…

Asking for a Donation

Philanthropy is about so much more than a financial transaction. It is an occasion for letting humaneness flow and flourish. This may reflect in how a fundraiser asks for a donation. Please read In-Depth Philanthropy. The intellect and the heart One may rationally conclude that the best giving is maximally based on rationality. Many people Read the full article…

Translate »