What seems ‘Easy’ and is Not
The subconceptual domain may seem ‘easy’ mainly for those who operate predominantly within a conceptual framework. On the other side, what comes out of this domain may seem magical, almost impossible, for the same people.
This is highly relevant as subconceptual influences, often underestimated, can have profound effects on our understanding and interactions in various fields. This leads to specific challenges — firstly, to convince primarily conceptual thinkers of the possibilities; secondly, to mitigate anxiety when they see actually (being bound to) happen ‘what cannot be.’
In art
This may lead some to incredulously see others appreciate art as of prime importance. Of course, something isn’t art by virtue of being called so. This makes it even more challenging since some may call anything ‘art’ and try to get by for reasons of standing and money.
When is ‘art’ art? Difficult to say. In any case, it’s about more than what is superficially observed.
In coaching
Excellent coaching has an aspect of ‘as by itself’ — very different from ‘by itself’ (being magic) but this may equally be challenging to appreciate.
Thus, one may look at the printout of a coaching session without appreciating anything that is really happening in that session.
It may happen invisibly — even to the coachee.
In developing A.I.
Concocting something that appears somehow ‘intelligent’ is enough for some to deem themselves ‘A.I. developers.’
This is crazy stuff – yet frequently encountered – and uncannily dangerous on top of that!
In combination
Unfortunately, many (most) A.I. developers have no clue about the human subconceptual domain. Thus, they think that, for instance, human-A.I. alignment is a simple question of the right decisions (‘easily’ made by philosophers or themselves) and developing some software to enact these.
Sorry, but that would be hilarious if it wouldn’t be an existential threat to humanity.
Into what seems to be ‘easy’ and is not.
Doing this, one quickly enters a highly complex field full of mines and booby traps — no problem if you know more or less what you’re doing, but… precisely. And sadly, this may lead, in many cases, to the wrong experts leading the conversations even at decision-making levels.
This deeply resonates with AURELIS’ philosophy of integrating rationality and human depth, emphasizing the necessity of a balanced approach that respects both the conceptual and subconceptual realms, ensuring a holistic view that avoids oversimplification and acknowledges the inherent complexity of human cognition and emotion.
We need to know first who we are, then what A.I. can be.
Nothing is ‘easy’ just by itself.
Related Posts
Making Oneself Invisible
People often think that making themselves invisible will protect them ― from conflict, from self-doubt, and from uncomfortable truths. The same happens at the level of society. When something threatens money, power, or status, it’s easier to just not think about it than to face the reality of deep change. But invisibility is an illusion. Read the full article…
Antifragility
What if there’s a way to grow stronger, not just survive, through life’s inevitable challenges? This concept, known as antifragility, was popularized by Nassim Nicholas Taleb in his 2012 book “Antifragile: Things That Gain from Disorder.” Unlike (Taleb’s concept of) resilience, which merely withstands stress, antifragility refers to the capacity to thrive and even improve Read the full article…
What’s Wrong with the Kids?
Young generations today are facing unprecedented mental health challenges: anxiety, depression, attention deficits, and disorders like dyslexia are on the rise. This alarming trend leaves us asking: Why is this happening? And what can be done to reverse it? Surface symptoms vs. the deeper cause Many point to obvious factors ― academic pressures, social media, Read the full article…