Weak, Hard, Strong, Gentle

May 29, 2018 Cognitive Insights No Comments

One picture’s worth

In this picture, I put weak versus hard, whereas gentle and strong are rather pointing to each other. In many real-life situations, people put the two blobs in the picture against each other. They don’t want to be (A), so they fall into (B) or vice versa. I see in this an example of the general importance of making the correct distinctions.

Hard opposite to weak

Hardness is frequently the not-so-nice reaction to a weakness – at oneself or another person – that one loathes… and which may even be present inside the same person. In such case, the hardness is like a protective shell around a weak core with a huge sense of vulnerability. Such a person may show himself very hard in one situation and preposterously weak in another. The reverse is also possible: soft at the outside, hard at the heart.

Gentle and strong strengthen each other.

You may feel this at yourself in a general way. Picture yourself in a situation as being ‘gentle and strong’. It’s opening. They may even have each other as purpose. Gentleness wants to be strong – otherwise it’s weak. Strength wants to be gentle – otherwise it’s hard. Thus, there is a nice interplay between gentleness and strength. Let’s look at some examples.

At the cushion

The mediator knows: sitting in a weak way leads to muscle hardening and pain. Sitting in a hard way leads to tiredness and sloppiness (weakness) after a while.

At the other side: a gentle and strong way of sitting enhances the meditation itself. It’s inviting to the mind. In my experiences, it also leads to the kind of meditation that I prefer, itself being gentle and strong. Very inspiring.

For the guys

Another domain of relevance is ‘what a girl wants’. Generally, she doesn’t like the guy to be ‘hard’ (say: insensitive) to her. A weakling also doesn’t readily steal her heart. At the other side, his being gentle (as in ‘gentleman’) gets her attention. And strong? He may certainly be so.

At the leader’s place

Bossily hard: not ideal.

Soft as Mr. Nice Guy? Forget leadership.

At the other side: gentleness leads to dialogue and motivation (the real one). Strength leads to getting things done.

When gentle is seen as weak, strong as hard

then mishaps happen. People may react against what they mistake for something quite different. This way, they may forego important qualities. See this over a long period (lifetime?) and you may get a feel of the importance.

From weak-hard to gentle-strong

I think this is possible but proceeding too rashly may have an opposite effect. Having good examples – close to the own situation – is of tremendous help. Most important are good experiences in imagination or reality: trying to act sometimes a bit more gentle-strongly than usual. Then being also gently-strong to yourself, you may notice more and more how good it feels.

And how much more efficient it is – if done right – towards any of your goals.

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Depth = Width

Depth is the breath of the mind — each inhale gathers the world’s patterns, each exhale births clarity and Compassion. Without depth, we float on the surface; with depth, we anchor to the infinite. This interplay of depth and width doesn’t just enrich understanding; it connects us to the universal. The deeper we go, the Read the full article…

Contemplation vs. Thinking

Thinking and contemplation are two distinct ways of engaging with the world. Thinking is structured and task-oriented, moving from thought to thought with clarity and precision. Contemplation, by contrast, is thoughtless, inviting a deeper connection to the essence of things. While both are essential, contemplation reaches the core of who we truly are, providing insights Read the full article…

Against Reductionism

The present carries a danger of reductionism in several domains: mind to body, total self to ego, a kaleidoscope of social diversity to identity politics, or worse. These might be signs of a broader reductionism that seeks to make individuals more controllable by erasing their inherent complexity but thereby undermining the richness of human experience Read the full article…

Translate »