You as a Symbol

January 1, 2020 Cognitive Insights, Love & Relationship, Sociocultural Issues No Comments

The symbolic, as used in this text, is entirely the domain of the subconceptual. This is always present. Also, humans may always be symbolic to others.

Please read first: [see: “Symbolism: How-To“]

Many symbols.

Each in-depth symbol is a symbol of you. You find yourself in anything that acts as a profound symbol to you, within a vertical communication. [see: ” A Symbol Is Always YOU“]

However, this text is about you being the symbol. That may be even less obvious to many, but people form straightforward symbols for others.

Whoever you are

as a leader, parent, sibling, lover, coach, muse, man or woman at the side of a railway.

It may be very nice to feel yourself being a symbol to someone else. That brings meaningfulness. In my view, it is pretty underrated by many, including in a relationship.

Many couples would probably stay longer together when appreciating this. A relationship without symbolic undertones also lacks the energy that may come from that. After a while, it becomes boring.

Please don’t shoot me. I’m just describing things.

Also in an erotic sense.

Nothing is erotic if it is not perceived as such. For instance, a male bear never finds a female cat very erotic. That’s because the cat doesn’t live in his mind as an erotic entity. Why should she?

Closer to home, a man may live in the mind of a woman as an erotic entity. In that case, the man ‘symbolizes eros’ to her. This, to her, and as with any symbol, then again symbolizes herself. As a consequence, if the guy is pleasing to her, she might want to unify mentally and perhaps also physically.

If also vice versa, an exciting adventure may start.

Becoming a symbol

It may feel weird to anyone not acquainted with it, to suddenly feel symbolic, or to be treated as such. Different things can happen. It may feel exhilarating. It may also feel as if one’s real identity gets taken away through this.

Of course, that may also be the case, for instance in the media with a new celebrity.

Misusing symbols

Any symbolic happening may be manipulated. In the case of a person-as-symbol, this person may be the manipulator.

(S)he may also be the manipulated one, being treated as an object. This is a sorry thing for all involved. It denigrates a total-person to no-person. It may feel like rape. It may lead to it. Rape is a physical happening, but it is even more a symbolic happening. The assaulted person – man or woman – may feel dehumanized for a long time afterward.

In another symbolic situation, the same physical action is entirely different.

That is, of course, because symbols are active at the subconceptual level. This brings a fundamental choice that I answer as follows:

Everybody is principally entitled to act as a symbol

as long as this is done ethically: open, deep, respectful…

Being a symbol is being human. Every person may need to thoroughly manage that in order to make this world a better place.

Everyone should do so. It should be an ubiquitous part of education.

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Quality of Depth

Most people would agree that ‘quality of depth’ is profoundly relevant to them personally. At the same time, many may disagree about what it entails. It’s a challenging concept. It’s already challenging to grasp ‘human depth’ since subconceptual processing – therefore also the difficulty to conceptually get it – is an inextricable feature. ‘Deep’ itself Read the full article…

Prajna in Daily Life

The word ‘prajna’ comes from Sanskrit: pra (before) and jna (knowing). This points to something that exists before conscious knowledge — the deeper knowing that shapes our thoughts before they fully form. It is not something mystical or otherworldly. It is simply wisdom in action, also present in the way we think, speak, and interact Read the full article…

Nagarjuna’s Twist

Nagarjuna was an influential Indian Buddhist philosopher and the founder of the Madhyamaka school of Mahayana Buddhism. Renowned for his profound teachings on emptiness (śūnyatā) and interdependence (pratītyasamutpāda), he deeply influenced Buddhist thought and practice. Nāgārjuna’s teachings offer several profound lessons that can deepen our understanding of human complexity, especially when applied to AURELIS principles Read the full article…

Translate »