Related Posts
Philosophers vs. Philosophies
Philosophies often begin as living, breathing processes embodied by thinkers who wrestle with the deepest questions of existence. But over time, what was once a dynamic exploration frequently hardens into a fixed system. The philosopher – a person engaged in the ongoing act of questioning – becomes overshadowed by the philosophy, which claims to offer Read the full article…
Philosophical Modernism’s Self-Destruction
Philosophical modernism, emerging prominently in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, sought to challenge and redefine previous intellectual traditions. While it produced valuable progress in art, literature, and thought, its focus on rationality and surface-level analysis often came at the expense of depth. This imbalance eventually led to its decline and self-destruction. This blog Read the full article…
Why Humanism Needs AURELIS
I admit: this title is quite highbrow. I need to do some explaining. [see also: “Humanism with a Vengeance”] Humanism = taking human being into account as-is. Not as some organization portrays it if this runs counter to obvious reality, of which science and rationality are pretty good critics, even if not necessarily the only Read the full article…