October 26, 2021 Cognitive Insights, Sociocultural Issues No Comments

Accepting one’s fate may be very beautiful if it comes from deep inside. Any other kind is worth little.

An animal runs away from a predator.

The predator grabs it. The animal struggles and dies. It all happens in a short time. Until the last moment, there is little question of fate as far as the dying animal is concerned.

Humans die much longer. They also yearn and suffer much longer. They know fate, which they may accept or not.

Thinking about fate comes with thinking consciously.

In all this, the only Compassionate stance feels to me the following:

Fate must be free.

This is, nobody should coerce anyone else to ‘accept his fate.’

For instance, during a pandemic, the choice may be between either the protection of old people or the freedom of younger people to socialize. Here, the argument ‘accept your fate’ is no good argument, as it never is.

Yet, the choice needs to be made ― here as in many other occasions in which people live together in a society.

Thus, tragedy exists.

This doesn’t lie in the coercion to accept one’s fate but in accepting that fate exists. It is part of the deal, part of the gift of consciousness that we received from nature.

It throws one out of a garden, but only as an illusion.

In reality, fate may be the most Compassionate issue,

but only in freedom. In coercion, there is no fate, but only coercion ― as in “You must accept your fate.” You see, what’s the difference with “You must accept my coercion”?

In free fate, there is the free choice to accept one’s fate, as there is also the free choice to keep hoping, or Hoping. [see: “About Hope”]

Both may be immensely beautiful.

Accepting fate

This is what makes it beautiful to me. Then again, ‘acceptance’ in this is crucially challenging. [see: “The Tough Concept of ‘Acceptance’”]

For one thing, it is incompatible with ‘making one accept something.’

It all hangs quite together, doesn’t it?

Meanwhile, decisions need to be taken; policies need to be made.

Making them with Compassion makes a difference for everyone.

Is it possible to die with a smile?

Is it possible to postpone living with a smile?

Absolutely, and more: both are worth living and dying for.

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

If You Fake, Do It for Real

‘For real’ is like a very good mime, for instance. It’s fake and at the same time, it may be more real than reality itself. ‘Reality inside’ is more important than ‘reality outside.’ Then who is the faker? While faking, you may get closer and closer to full reality. Faking is in such case a Read the full article…

Feeling without Feelings

I am feeling. I am ‘without feelings.’ The science It may not seem so but this is actually the most scientifically sound way to look at feelings/emotions, backed by many studies, contradicted by none. One good book about this is “How Emotions Are Made: The Secret Life of the Brain” by Lisa Feldman Barrett (2017). Read the full article…

Inner vs. Outer Change of Patterns

This is about mental-neuronal patterns. Although this term speaks of recent scientific insights, the known relevance is age-old and ubiquitous. It is also a basic choice for the future. All in the mind? ‘Inner vs. outer change’ is not about what happens inside or outside of one’s mind, but inside or outside of individual mental-neuronal Read the full article…

Translate »