Explorative Learning

April 29, 2022 Cognitive Insights No Comments

Self-learning through exploration. This is a kind of reinforcement learning, but with specifically sought reinforcements towards efficient learning.

Like a human child

A child strives to get deep attention, which functions as reinforcement. The child does explicitly the things that lead to reinforcement ― such as by deep attention. Expecting this provokes activation of dopaminergic systems with multiple effects on the brain, making the brain/mind more prone to capture what happens next ― namely, to learn in an explorative way.

Instead of doing the hard work of making us intelligent, nature has given us this and the motivation to build on it ever further. That also makes us independent of circumstances. Put a human in any condition, and, naturally, he is inquisitive, and will have an incentive to adaptively learn from that condition what is needed to thrive.

Some more so than others. That may make the main difference between less or more intelligent people. It also shows what can be done toward a more intelligent end result.

Playing

To play is to explore, finding new possibilities or new ways to attain the same goal. The unexpected that comes with the exploration puts joy into the playing. It is specifically about not doing the same thing with the same result.

So, it playing nature’s invention to make us learn, or do we call it ‘play’ because explorative learning is joyful? Do children play together because social explorative learning is joyful?

Meaningful play

Play can be profoundly meaningful in dealing with other humans or oneself. This brings a crucial new dimension to learning.

This contrasts with much modern-day computer gaming. At least, I see in this little more than a superficial dopamine flow enhancing repetitive action ― little deep meaningfulness involved.

The human being as a lifelong player

This is: a lifelong explorative learner. Our human intelligence is a result of this huge amount of exploration. Therefore, learning may be seen as more fundamental than intelligence itself.

In its active seeking for reinforcement, explorative learning is also motivational. Providing motivation to explore closes the circle.

At school

In school education, for instance, seeing the child as a mere recipient of information leads to demotivation. Trying harder to get the information into the recipient brings even more demotivation. That’s the way many children get bad in one field or another.

The better alternative is providing an environment of exploration. However, this is demanding. It doesn’t get realized from any far-away good intention. Profound insight is needed.

Conceptual – subconceptual

Since the ‘intelligent entity’ (human, for instance) initiates the exploration, it can be oriented more or less conceptually. The child can intuitively feel what is good or bad. Or it can do so more conceptually or ‘clearly.’

In a human brain/mind, ‘conceptual versus subconceptual’ is always fluid. There is a continual path running from one to the other. Looking more closely, there is a natural overlap. This way, human learning and intelligence are not merely conceptual (like a modern computer) or subconceptual (like a low life form). We are both at the same time. This is also quite interesting for what happens next.

The consequence to A.I.

This leads to explorative self-learning A.I.

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

The Story of Ego

The evolution from ‘I’ into ‘ego’ has been very gradual, as has been the appearance of consciousness. In a way, the latter is central to the former. [see: The Story of ‘I’. The present text is its continuation.] Consciousness has not been developed for the sake of ‘ego’. Nevertheless, it was indispensable for the appearance Read the full article…

Being Critical is Not Being Closed

I’m rarely on it like this, but I think this piece is really of the utmost importance for an AURELIS coach. With this, it stands or falls. It is therefore advisable to read this text very carefully several times. It is not devoid of subtlety. Try your best not to misunderstand. Talk about it openly. Read the full article…

Flower Power vs. Uniform Power

We may need both ― without exaggeration in any. Flowery power Each flower is different. Yet none grow into the ground. There is uniformity even in flowers. Nevertheless, many flowers in a field don’t take advantage of each other’s strength. One danger in being flowery is therefore that each flower is fragile and can easily Read the full article…

Translate »