Consciousness & Communication

September 30, 2019 Cognitive Insights, Communication, Consciousness No Comments

Why and how has consciousness emerged? One take on this: intra- as well as extracranial communication.

Why = how

Organic life is not the product of an engineer who starts with the question of why he should build something, then proceeds with how he can achieve his goals.

Organic life evolves from instance to instance, each time taking the road to optimization of self-replication. Part of this lies in keeping alive long enough.

Thus, there is only one why, and that is: how can things be optimized? The only ‘intelligence’ behind it is trial and error. Then again, this may be more sophisticated than just playing dice. Anyway, in such circumstance: why = how. This also means that

evolution is always gradual.

There is no need for an end goal – such as developing consciousness – in the long run, to be achieved over many generations.

As well, in hindsight, there is no one point of emergence of something as complex as consciousness. A long and winding road is mandatory. In other words: animals are conscious too, be it to lesser degrees. Where in evolution one may start talking about the big c-word, is arbitrary. Your dog? A mouse? The angry bee that stung you when you were a child? You decide.

Let’s look at one case now, knowing where it comes from. This case is you.

Intracranial communication

You have a lot of different brain parts, each more or less specialized, be it in sometimes amazingly flexible ways. One functionality – for instance, deciding whether to read on – may be realized through different parts in your brain versus that of the next reader.

This kind of flexibility is especially high for consciousness. Nevertheless, one characteristic seems to be ubiquitous:

active connections between many brain parts.

For instance: your cerebellum (back of your brain) contains most of your brainy neurons, but there is little connection between the parts, so: little contribution to consciousness. Vice versa in your cortex. In situations where these connections are made inactive (coma, deep sleep, anesthesia…), you lose consciousness.

Bring back the connections and you regain consciousness.

You are – relatively, but more than enough – special within the animal kingdom in that you at the same time have a quite big brain and you have a lot of communication – back and forth – between your brain parts. It could be better. It could be worse.

This communication is what you experience as ‘being conscious.’

Thus, consciousness is an experience, not some ‘special kind of stuff in the universe.’ Sorry. No dualism.

Nevertheless, it’s more than special enough. Consciousness brings you a lot of advantages and self-perpetuating patterns such as a very enhanced ability to conceptualize, to memorize, to plan, to compare options… Wow!

This is extremely relative. Even a fridge may ‘experience’ – to a very, very little degree – being a fridge, but it will never be able to conceptualize its experience. It’s not conscious.

A good question: will A.I.?

Extracranial communication

You are also social. Your intracranial communication comes in handy to immensely heighten your social capabilities. And vice versa: through being social, you can also develop your intracranial complexity to a huge degree.

In other words, you are conscious of a whole culture. You even have access to the Internet.

Evolutionarily

this intra- and extracranial communication have probably very much bootstrapped each other. This made possible, towards the human species, a rut towards consciousness as part of our habitat and evolutionary niche in which we became more and more advantageous.

One way or another, we dispersed of close competitors – more and more of these are found by archaeologists – heightening the gap between quite conscious and very much less conscious species.

Consciousness through and for communication

So, we now have consciousness much more than any other kind of animal. Let’s use it to good ends. To the latter, communication is key. Also in depth.

Listening this way is so very important. [see: “Deep Listening”]

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Art (an AURELIS Viewpoint)

Art is often mistaken for a skillful arrangement of colors or a familiar aesthetic that soothes or impresses. But true art is not a trick of technique. True art grows — from the inside out. It invites, resonates, and moves something deep within the observer. This is where AURELIS and art meet: in the realm Read the full article…

TMS/EEG – A Stone in a Pond

TMS = Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (giving a magnetic pulse through the skull to the brain in a specific region). EEG = Electro-Encephalo-Graphy (recording voltage changes over brain regions). TMS is like throwing a stone in a pond (the brain). EEG is like looking at how the pond responds. This is probably the most interesting set Read the full article…

Popperian vs. Kuhnian

Karl Popper and Thomas Kuhn were two heavyweights in the thinking-about-science of the 20th century. Popper saw scientific progress as a gradual drifting. Kuhn added to this a sudden shifting — as in ‘paradigm shift.’ One can broaden this dichotomy to thinking in general. Many people are continually inclined, in their thinking, to go from Read the full article…

Translate »