Ego-Centered A.I. Downfall
This isn’t solely about ‘bad actors’ aiming for world domination or slightly lesser evils. It’s also about those seen – by themselves and others – as good people, yet who are ‘trapped in ego.’
Many people, unfortunately. See also Human-Centered A.I.: Total-Person or Ego? / Human-Centered or Ego-Centered A.I.?
Not new
This has always been the case. Homo sapiens is an ego-driven species. While this isn’t inherently negative, combining it with A.I. introduces unique challenges. The outcome is uncertain.
Unsurprisingly, the A.I. developed so far fits the ego-driven model, lacking Compassion. This amplifies ego, which further drives the development of similar A.I.
The following are some examples where something that looks positively promising may turn out pretty bad because it’s positive for the ego in opposition to the total person.
In medicine
Chronic symptoms often involve an element of communication with the deeper self, serving as a call to look inward — beyond mere ego. Most medications merely kill symptoms, disrupting this deeper communication.
‘A.I. as a boon for pharmacology’ can and will be used to further the cause of getting rid of symptoms quickly, easily, and meaninglessly.
The same for many diagnostics. Where Listening to the Self is asked for, materialistically oriented diagnostics may lead all focus away from this. Through the finding of something material, the mind leaves the stage — especially if that is already usually the primary aim. Also, in a mind=body setting, there is theoretically always something material that can be found.
The deeper mind gets lost.
In the judiciary
We see this happening already: A.I. facilitates lawsuits, resulting in many more driven by ego-purposes.
This way, people are less inclined to deeply listen to each other — losing whatever remains of this capacity.
This way, society further hardens into an ego-versus-ego conglomerate of individuals.
In leisure
Here, we have already seen much of it. People seek to be entertained from the outside as a substitute for what might come from the inside out.
A.I. delivers the entertainment people seek — ego demands, ego receives. For instance, the entire gaming domain is largely ego-oriented. The rapid actions and instant rewards only lead to more of this, leaving no time or incentive for deeper engagement.
In short
We don’t need bad actors, bad scientists, or bad A.I. to trigger disasters in using increasingly powerful A.I. developments.
In good intentions lie already dangers enough.
Contrary to this – and as stated in the AURELIS philosophy – combining rationality with utmost respect for human depth leads to efficient, ethical, and durable change. This principle could guide the development of Human-Centered A.I. that enhance rather than diminish our humanity.
Keep thinking.
Related Posts
Containing A.I. by Becoming Less Human?
The looming presence of super-A.I. may present an existential threat to humanity. Our defense must begin with an honest understanding of our true nature — a defense rooted in superficial self-perception risks being both ineffective and self-destructive. Containing A.I. by diminishing our humanity could be the most perilous choice, especially since we already tend to Read the full article…
The Spiritual Dimension of A.I.
Spirituality has always been more about movement than possession. As A.I. grows in complexity and subtlety, might it come to walk alongside us in this deeper rhythm — not claiming to be sacred, but learning how to support what is? In that case, A.I. could begin to resonate with what humans call the spiritual, not Read the full article…
Super-A.I. is not a Literal Idiot.
Some see danger in future A.I.’s lacking common sense ― thereby interpreting ‘human commands’ literally and giving what is asked instead of what is wanted. This says more about humans than about the A.I. Two examples One person needing paperclips may ask an A.I. to produce paperclips as efficiently and effectively as possible. The A.I. Read the full article…