Fate
Accepting one’s fate may be very beautiful if it comes from deep inside. Any other kind is worth little.
An animal runs away from a predator.
The predator grabs it. The animal struggles and dies. It all happens in a short time. Until the last moment, there is little question of fate as far as the dying animal is concerned.
Humans die much longer. They also yearn and suffer much longer. They know fate, which they may accept or not.
Thinking about fate comes with thinking consciously.
In all this, the only Compassionate stance feels to me the following:
Fate must be free.
This is, nobody should coerce anyone else to ‘accept his fate.’
For instance, during a pandemic, the choice may be between either the protection of old people or the freedom of younger people to socialize. Here, the argument ‘accept your fate’ is no good argument, as it never is.
Yet, the choice needs to be made ― here as in many other occasions in which people live together in a society.
Thus, tragedy exists.
This doesn’t lie in the coercion to accept one’s fate but in accepting that fate exists. It is part of the deal, part of the gift of consciousness that we received from nature.
It throws one out of a garden, but only as an illusion.
In reality, fate may be the most Compassionate issue,
but only in freedom. In coercion, there is no fate, but only coercion ― as in “You must accept your fate.” You see, what’s the difference with “You must accept my coercion”?
In free fate, there is the free choice to accept one’s fate, as there is also the free choice to keep hoping, or Hoping. [see: “About Hope”]
Both may be immensely beautiful.
Accepting fate
This is what makes it beautiful to me. Then again, ‘acceptance’ in this is crucially challenging. [see: “The Tough Concept of ‘Acceptance’”]
For one thing, it is incompatible with ‘making one accept something.’
It all hangs quite together, doesn’t it?
Meanwhile, decisions need to be taken; policies need to be made.
Making them with Compassion makes a difference for everyone.
Is it possible to die with a smile?
Is it possible to postpone living with a smile?
Absolutely, and more: both are worth living and dying for.
Related Posts
Subconceptual – Conceptual: a Dynamic Continuum?
In humans, the subconceptual layer – the deeper, intuitive, and often non-conscious level – feeds into the conceptual layer, which organizes thoughts into more structured, conscious forms. Their working together as a dynamic continuum is key to understanding complex phenomena while making meaningful decisions. Concepts can never perfectly capture the messiness of the physical world, Read the full article…
Beyond Vagueness: Flexible Understanding
As seen in >Vagueness of Mind<, vagueness can hold depth, nuance, even a kind of sacred richness. But after standing in the mist for a while, a question begins to arise: What now? Must we live forever in not-knowing? Not necessarily. There is a way forward toward a kind of understanding that stays open, alive, Read the full article…
Are you happy?
The question “Are you happy?” can feel strangely unsettling, as if we should have an answer ready. But what if happiness isn’t something to achieve, but something that arises, expands, and flows? It’s something we all seek, yet the moment we try to grasp it, it often slips through our fingers. I remember a conversation Read the full article…