In the End, it’s the Complexity

June 17, 2024 General Insights No Comments

When many elements interact in different ways, they tend to form patterns with some persistence or recurrence. From their interaction, several characteristics sprout, such as life and intelligent behavior.

The medium, in its broadest sense, is merely an enabler.

Please read first: Complex is not Complicated.

Across any scale of time or space

For instance, complexity can lead to extraordinary properties not only in physical systems but also in social contexts, reflecting the intricate web of human interactions. Whether large or small, quick or prolonged, centralized or distributed, complexity manifests in various ways. In any of these, there is the potential for ‘emerging’ intelligence.

So we reached the e-word.

Emergence

Complexity fosters emergence. With sufficient drive, emergence becomes inevitable. With enough complexity, emergence leads to intelligence.

This idea resonates with AURELIS’s focus on the subconceptual level, where complex mental-neuronal patterns form the basis of intelligent behavior.

Moreover, when searching for other intelligences in the universe, we should broadly seek out situations characterized by significant complexity. This search can guide us not only in the cosmos but also in understanding and enhancing artificial intelligence on Earth.

The amount

A smaller quantity of something contains less complexity than a larger quantity of the same. For instance, this is why the human brain realizes more intelligence than the brains of big apes, as they do relative to those of smaller mammals.

Elephants and whales also demonstrate intelligence. It’s intriguing to imagine what a Neuralink device linked to advanced effectors might reveal.

LLMs

Even to the developers’ surprise, large LLMs exhibit intelligent behavior far more effectively than smaller ones.

It’s not merely the size but the complexity involved. Therefore, achieving the same complexity in a smaller size could yield similar results — for instance, by eliminating significant redundancy. Then again, what appears redundant may actually contribute to the complexity and resilience of the system.

Randomness

Intriguingly, there is a sweet spot in this. A certain level of randomness enhances complexity — or at least its effective behavior. Excessive randomness diminishes it. However, this probably only works indirectly. A certain degree of randomness allows the system to integrate more complexity at another level.

Once again, it’s the complexity that matters.

All paths lead to complexity.

We should embrace this scientifically.

Addendum

Me: “Lisa, do you think that with increasing complexity, A.I. will increasingly gain intelligence, on and on, endlessly?”

Lisa: “Increasing complexity in AI systems does lead to more advanced and sophisticated behaviors, which can be perceived as increasing intelligence. AI systems, like large language models (LLMs), show that with more data and more complex architectures, they can exhibit more intelligent behaviors. However, there are several factors to consider:

  • Computational limits: There are physical and computational limits to how much complexity can be handled efficiently. The resources required (such as processing power, memory, and energy) increase exponentially with complexity.
  • Human understanding: Intelligence in AI is currently bounded by human understanding and the algorithms we can create. True intelligence might require new paradigms beyond current machine learning techniques.
  • Ethical and societal implications: As AI becomes more complex, ethical considerations and societal impacts become more significant. Ensuring that AI remains beneficial is crucial.”

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Glossary

Several of these terms are specific to AURELIS. If you want some AURELIS-specific term explained, please email us at lisa@aurelis.org . Active acceptance: Embracing one’s experiences and emotions fully without resistance, facilitating inner peace and personal growth. Active placebo: An active placebo itself has (side) effects (unlike a passive placebo). To the extent that the Read the full article…

Three Dangers of Careless Depth

The ‘deeper’ has already led to many accidents. Look at the pitiful excesses of Catholicism. It’s just an example. But that should not be a reason to throw away the ‘deeper’. However, one ought to be particularly careful with it. As a starters, one can make a primary distinction between: BLACK – the ‘deeper’ turns Read the full article…

Depth Makes the Teacher

Okay. I immediately ask myself whom I am actually writing this for. It is striking that people, if they start listening to someone who wants to gain a better ‘understanding’ of something, tend to some kind of expectation where that ‘someone’ should fit in. Would C.G. Jung talk about an archetype? He probably would. Different Read the full article…

Translate »