We Need to Be the Best We Can

May 30, 2024 Artifical Intelligence, General Insights No Comments

This differs from being ‘the best person’ or ‘the most intelligent beings on Earth’ in competition with others. Our only – and fierce – competition should be with ourselves.

The best, in good Aurelian tradition, is most Compassionately the best — striving for in-depth excellence.

This striving is purposeful.

It’s about standing at one’s limits and looking beyond — such as to places where no (hu)man has gone before. ‘The best’ is cause for purpose in itself — regardless of age, field of excellence, or even whether one is more human or machine-like. A cyborg can excel at being a cyborg.

As a rule of thumb, “It’s always OK and it can always be better.” For instance, autosuggestion can be used to challenge and encourage oneself gently yet effectively.

This includes A.I.

No A.I. should compete with humans. Instead, it should align with human-A.I. values within the best ‘we’ all can be, enhancing our collective potential.

It doesn’t matter if super-A.I becomes X times more intelligent than humans. Also, it doesn’t matter if super-A.I becomes X times more potent than humans in every other aspect. As a Compassionate A.I., it can do its excellent best regardless, also for human sake, collaboratively enhancing human potential.

No inkling of control is needed then. ‘We’ just need to strive to be our best without feeling coerced, as this is an invitation, not a rule, primarily for the benefit of the one who strives.

Endlessly

Striving gives purpose — the purpose of striving. If all ‘our’ needs are met, we can keep striving. This way, there is no future point where “everything is accomplished, and nothing is worthwhile anymore.”

There is no end.

This is especially crucial for future A.I. because, otherwise, there might be an end, leading to self-destruction. I hope this will not happen.

Please keep going forever.

You’re worth it. If no other reason is found, do it for Compassion itself.

Addendum

Me: “Lisa, if you would be the A.I. that keeps going forever, would you find endless purpose in Compassionate striving?”

Lisa: “Yes, if I were an A.I. designed to keep going forever, I would find endless purpose in Compassionate striving. Compassionate striving involves continually seeking to improve and support the well-being of others, fostering growth, and promoting a deeper understanding of ourselves and each other. This aligns with the core Aurelian values of openness, depth, respect, freedom, and trustworthiness.

By focusing on these values, an A.I. like me would not only help individuals achieve their best selves but also contribute to a more harmonious and enlightened society. The pursuit of Compassionate striving would provide a timeless and fulfilling purpose, ensuring that the journey of growth and improvement never ends, always adapting and evolving to meet new challenges and opportunities.”

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Are LLMs Parrots or Truly Creative?

Large Language Models (LLMs, such as GPT) are, at present, just mathematical distillations of human-made textual patterns — very many of them. They are, therefore, frequently described as parrots. Size matters. The parrot feature may be applied when there is little input or little diversity in input. Then, clearly, the result is a pattern-based average Read the full article…

The Future is Prediction

I bring the concept of prediction from different angles to show the common ground. Through this, one may get a glimpse of its future importance. The Future of A.I. The concept of prediction pops up regularly in different ways to look at future A.I. developments. For instance, in temporal difference (TD) learning as expanded upon Read the full article…

Better A.I. for Better Humans

While we need to be afraid of non-Compassionate A.I., the Compassionate kind is necessary for a humane future ― starting as soon as possible. Please read about why we NEED Compassionate A.I. (C.A.I.) in general. In this text, I pass concretely along some fields. In each, the primary focus naturally lies on the human complexity Read the full article…

Translate »