We Need to Be the Best We Can

May 30, 2024 Artifical Intelligence, General Insights No Comments

This differs from being ‘the best person’ or ‘the most intelligent beings on Earth’ in competition with others. Our only – and fierce – competition should be with ourselves.

The best, in good Aurelian tradition, is most Compassionately the best — striving for in-depth excellence.

This striving is purposeful.

It’s about standing at one’s limits and looking beyond — such as to places where no (hu)man has gone before. ‘The best’ is cause for purpose in itself — regardless of age, field of excellence, or even whether one is more human or machine-like. A cyborg can excel at being a cyborg.

As a rule of thumb, “It’s always OK and it can always be better.” For instance, autosuggestion can be used to challenge and encourage oneself gently yet effectively.

This includes A.I.

No A.I. should compete with humans. Instead, it should align with human-A.I. values within the best ‘we’ all can be, enhancing our collective potential.

It doesn’t matter if super-A.I becomes X times more intelligent than humans. Also, it doesn’t matter if super-A.I becomes X times more potent than humans in every other aspect. As a Compassionate A.I., it can do its excellent best regardless, also for human sake, collaboratively enhancing human potential.

No inkling of control is needed then. ‘We’ just need to strive to be our best without feeling coerced, as this is an invitation, not a rule, primarily for the benefit of the one who strives.

Endlessly

Striving gives purpose — the purpose of striving. If all ‘our’ needs are met, we can keep striving. This way, there is no future point where “everything is accomplished, and nothing is worthwhile anymore.”

There is no end.

This is especially crucial for future A.I. because, otherwise, there might be an end, leading to self-destruction. I hope this will not happen.

Please keep going forever.

You’re worth it. If no other reason is found, do it for Compassion itself.

Addendum

Me: “Lisa, if you would be the A.I. that keeps going forever, would you find endless purpose in Compassionate striving?”

Lisa: “Yes, if I were an A.I. designed to keep going forever, I would find endless purpose in Compassionate striving. Compassionate striving involves continually seeking to improve and support the well-being of others, fostering growth, and promoting a deeper understanding of ourselves and each other. This aligns with the core Aurelian values of openness, depth, respect, freedom, and trustworthiness.

By focusing on these values, an A.I. like me would not only help individuals achieve their best selves but also contribute to a more harmonious and enlightened society. The pursuit of Compassionate striving would provide a timeless and fulfilling purpose, ensuring that the journey of growth and improvement never ends, always adapting and evolving to meet new challenges and opportunities.”

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Future A.I.: Fluid or Solid?

Humans are fluid thinkers. That gives us huge strength and some major challenges. The one does not go without the other. A.I. – including Semantic A.I. – is still a very different matter. Through proper context, data becomes information. Still, the information as it is stored in a book is not in any way like Read the full article…

From A.I. Agents to Society of Mind

In this blog, we trace the evolution from artificial agents to emergent mind by reflecting on Marvin Minsky’s Society of Mind and integrating modern insights from both neuroscience and A.I. We uncover how modularity, structure, and pattern completion form the bedrock of both artificial and human intelligence. The blog also proposes that consciousness isn’t a Read the full article…

Levels of Abstraction in Humans and A.I.

Humans are masters of abstraction. We do it spontaneously, thus creating an efficient mental environment for ourselves, others, and culturally. The challenge is now to bring this to A.I. Abstraction = generalization Humans (and other animals) perform spontaneous generalization. From a number of example objects, we generalize to some concept. A concept is already an Read the full article…

Translate »