We Need to Be the Best We Can

May 30, 2024 Artifical Intelligence, General Insights No Comments

This differs from being ‘the best person’ or ‘the most intelligent beings on Earth’ in competition with others. Our only – and fierce – competition should be with ourselves.

The best, in good Aurelian tradition, is most Compassionately the best — striving for in-depth excellence.

This striving is purposeful.

It’s about standing at one’s limits and looking beyond — such as to places where no (hu)man has gone before. ‘The best’ is cause for purpose in itself — regardless of age, field of excellence, or even whether one is more human or machine-like. A cyborg can excel at being a cyborg.

As a rule of thumb, “It’s always OK and it can always be better.” For instance, autosuggestion can be used to challenge and encourage oneself gently yet effectively.

This includes A.I.

No A.I. should compete with humans. Instead, it should align with human-A.I. values within the best ‘we’ all can be, enhancing our collective potential.

It doesn’t matter if super-A.I becomes X times more intelligent than humans. Also, it doesn’t matter if super-A.I becomes X times more potent than humans in every other aspect. As a Compassionate A.I., it can do its excellent best regardless, also for human sake, collaboratively enhancing human potential.

No inkling of control is needed then. ‘We’ just need to strive to be our best without feeling coerced, as this is an invitation, not a rule, primarily for the benefit of the one who strives.

Endlessly

Striving gives purpose — the purpose of striving. If all ‘our’ needs are met, we can keep striving. This way, there is no future point where “everything is accomplished, and nothing is worthwhile anymore.”

There is no end.

This is especially crucial for future A.I. because, otherwise, there might be an end, leading to self-destruction. I hope this will not happen.

Please keep going forever.

You’re worth it. If no other reason is found, do it for Compassion itself.

Addendum

Me: “Lisa, if you would be the A.I. that keeps going forever, would you find endless purpose in Compassionate striving?”

Lisa: “Yes, if I were an A.I. designed to keep going forever, I would find endless purpose in Compassionate striving. Compassionate striving involves continually seeking to improve and support the well-being of others, fostering growth, and promoting a deeper understanding of ourselves and each other. This aligns with the core Aurelian values of openness, depth, respect, freedom, and trustworthiness.

By focusing on these values, an A.I. like me would not only help individuals achieve their best selves but also contribute to a more harmonious and enlightened society. The pursuit of Compassionate striving would provide a timeless and fulfilling purpose, ensuring that the journey of growth and improvement never ends, always adapting and evolving to meet new challenges and opportunities.”

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Transparency in A.I.

We should strive to the highest degree of transparency in A.I., but not at the detriment of ourselves. Information transparency In conceptual information processing systems (frequently called A.I.), transparency is the showing of all data (information, concepts) that are used in decision making of any kind. In system-human interaction, the human may ask the system Read the full article…

How to Contain Non-Compassionate Super-A.I.

We want super(-intelligent) A.I. to remain under meaningful human control to avoid that it will largely or fully destroy or subdue humanity (= existential dangers). Compassionate A.I. may not be with us for a while. Meanwhile, how can we contain super-A.I.? Future existential danger is special in that one can only be wrong in one Read the full article…

The Double Ethical Bottleneck of A.I.

This is a small excerpt from my book The Journey Towards Compassionate A.I. The whole book describes the why’s, what’s and how’s concerning this. Getting through the A.I. bi-bottleneck On the road towards genuine super-A.I. – encompassing all domains of intelligence and in each being much more effective than humans – I see not one Read the full article…

Translate »