ACE towards the Making of a Better Person

June 24, 2018 Morality No Comments

ACE (Adopt-Combine-Enhance) is a nice instrument, guided by a synthesis of rationality and poetry.

[see: ’ACE in a Moral World‘]

The making of

No engineering stuff. We are nature. The ‘making’ lies in the support of nature to further itself from inside out. Morality lies in the direction of this support within our natural constraints [see: ‘Morality Is the Relief of Suffering’].

Nature doesn’t like to be changed from outside. It does like to change (grow) from inside. This is the main reason for the Adopt, starting from what is already there.

Combining ‘things already there’ then leads to new functionalities. For instance, humans have agile fingers, together with brains to conceptualize all kinds of stuff. As a result, I’m typing this text on my computer. Hands nor brain have been developed in order to do this typing. The combination makes the opportunity.

In the same example, both elements (brains and fingers) have been Enhanced just enough. Otherwise we would still use them to throw stones or make a primitive fire. Not to put blogs on the Internet.

Better person: ethics

Morality should not be directed towards the making of ethically perfect people who are depressive or ‘zombified’ (not-un-happy but altogether soul-less, see Brave New World – A. Huxley).

Morality should be directed towards the making of ethically sound, reasonably happy people in depth. ‘Superficially happy’ is, in my view, not enough. It doesn’t satisfy me. Does it to you? In any case, the ‘growth’ aspect provides more inner space in which to be happy anyway.

Little space, little happiness.

Big space, big happiness and then a possible overflow of this into good deeds which are themselves filled with happiness, one way or another.

ACE:

  • A: the person-as-is, is the basis of morality. We are nature.
  • C: living in groups, eventually one worldwide group, is a new element.
  • E: using the own nature as much as possible to live a good life in group, we can grow (enhance).

Better person: health

The AURELIS striving goes towards healthy people in body and mind, enjoying life (A and C) and able to adapt (E) to changing circumstances.

AURELIS

Ethics and health come together into the ‘better person’, being better for all including oneself. This is what the end characters of AURELIS are about: Inner Strength to be able to make a difference. Any small difference is OK; a big one can be made if the occasion arises.

ACE leads to proper results within a synthesis of rationality and poetry.

With the latter, I mean the ‘poetry of life’ in a very general sense.

This combination assumes insight. Say: a lot of work. Needed because

  • without rationality, poetry leads to chaos
  • rationality is in itself not complete without poetry since it’s about the complete

Without this combination (synthesis), ACE can lead to very unseemly results.

Thus:

<Rationality+poetry> is the goal, at the individual level as well as at the level of society.

ACE is the instrument, used by nature. As much as possible, it should also be used by us in any endeavor to ‘make better persons’.

AURELIS is an environment in which this can be realized.

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Who Needs Free Will for Moral Behavior?

“If there is no free will, I am not responsible for my actions.” I utterly disagree. Responsibility is not guilt. Without free will, you are not guilty. With free will, you are not guilty. Responsibility is something you can take within any circumstance. If there is no free will, then you can take responsibility within Read the full article…

Respect Has Many Faces

which are all related to a sense of morality: respect for the group, for authority, for human suffering… and also respect for ‘me’ which can be ego or total self. Delving towards ‘oneness’ The more one delves into human issues, the more one gets the feeling that everything is related. The deeper one goes, the Read the full article…

From Aggression to Efficiency

A link between aggression and efficiency is not frequently made. I hope that at the end of this text, this will be remedied. Whence cometh aggression? It seems to be as old as, well, much older than humanity. Even so, one might argue that ‘animal aggression’ is in most cases functional, thus more ‘humanly understandable’ Read the full article…

Translate »