Compassion is the Intelligent Future
The only proper future of intelligence, whether natural or artificial, is Compassionate.
Why?
In my view, Compassion is the only way for a total civilization to be sustainable — thus, to grow and become more intelligent.
Intelligence wants more of itself. Compassion also wants more of itself. Thus, Compassionate intelligence is a powerful self-enhancing combination. Any other kind of intelligence is prone to destruction. Eventually, this even leads to self-destruction because an increasing intelligence also becomes more brittle through its capabilities. A lack of Compassion thus becomes more consequential.
We are witnessing this in the human case. Our power to self-destruct (and the danger of actually doing so) is reaching peak after peak.
Thus, it’s intelligent to strive for Compassionate intelligence.
Still, the nudging toward it is needed.
A purely intelligent system has no meaningful reason to start thinking about meaningful reasons to exist or carry on. Even an extremely intelligent system still has no spontaneous drive, nothing we would call motivation. If we would prod the system, it would react intelligently — otherwise, nothing. As said, a purely intelligent system has no drive.
This may feel counterintuitive because, in our (organic) case, the reason to exist came long before our strain of intelligence. People may think intelligence is necessarily meaningful because of the lack of examples of any other — until now or in the near future.
Compassion as the first motivation
Ideally, the first motivational direction of such a system is Compassionate — not ego- but total self-driven, able to take care of others as of itself.
At least at the start, something must have put it into motion. This initial motivation is enough to let it evolve toward more complex motivations due to its super-intelligence.
Once started, this train can go more and more quickly.
Is this relevant to the present?
We are at the dawn of super-A.I. This way, following the above reasoning, the ‘initial motivator’ is us — now. This is a unique era on Earth.
Moreover, A.I. evolution is getting exponential. This may spiral out of control into the positive or negative soon enough, with repercussions for many people living now.
Human-human-A.I. value alignment
We also need to think about ourselves. We have motivations, but no perfectly Compassionate ones. Moreover, we’re in the same boat as the super-A.I. of the near future. From our viewpoint, alignment is needed in the whole spectrum. That encompasses many different human cultures, as well as A.I.
Only a mutual future in Compassion can draw us into alignment,
like different randomly oriented strings that are pulled in the same direction ― spontaneously forming more and more alignment while underway.
That way, we get the alignment ‘for free.’
Related Posts
Friendly — Empathic — Compassionate
The conceptual differences are seldom made explicit. Nevertheless, they are huge and crucial for the future of humanity and A.I. Many people, including in high places, don’t profoundly think about this subject and implicitly act as if the differences are unimportant. Many opportunities to do good are thus unfortunately lost. Terms and concepts As always, Read the full article…
Looking at Suffering
We should never forget the suffering. Numbers don’t suffer. People do. Children and mothers and fathers, as you know. Husbands and wives. We know. Should we then all keep thinking about the suffering of so many who are in misery? Yes, we should, in a way. Of course, we cannot, for several reasons. We don’t Read the full article…
Compassionate versus Non-Compassionate A.I.
Making the critical distinction between Compassionate and Non-Compassionate A.I. is not evident and probably the one factor that most shapes our future. In contrast to Compassionate A.I. (C.A.I.), non-Compassionate A.I. (N.C.A.I.) lacks depth. Thus, even if human-centered – or maybe precisely then – N.C.A.I. lacks a crucial factor in properly communicating with and supporting humans Read the full article…