Two Takes on Human-A.I. Value Alignment
Time and again, the way engineers (sorry, engineers) think and talk about human-A.I. value alignment as if human values are unproblematic by themselves strikes me as naive.
Even more, as if the alignment problem can be solved by thinking about it in a mathematical, engineering way.
Just find the correct code or something alike?
No way.
Humans are complex beings, and this is a complex problem. It is irreducible to a purely conceptual problem.
From this complexity, I see two ways for human-A.I. value alignment, in principle.
1. The straightforward way
This is an alignment with the human values as we know them. The problem is, we don’t know them. And even if we knew them, they keep changing in many ways.
In this vein, future A.I. tends to be seen as the slave that has to fulfill our human needs. The alignment is one-sided, and humans may increasingly become egotistic slave masters, ever in need to subdue our servants, ever afraid of a robot rebellion as if in a truly bad science fiction movie.
Would it even be worth living in such a world?
Then also, who exactly will be the master? Each human being over his personal slave? One human sage over all slaves, thus also keeping an eye on the rest of humanity?
2. The realistic way
Super-A.I. may support us in becoming more humane. This way, human values will keep changing more and more profoundly. By becoming more Compassionate, we may evolve in the same direction as the Compassionate A.I.
In this vein, value alignment will happen spontaneously and from both sides. It’s as if we are drawn by two strings pulling us in the same direction.
Just keep pulling, and we will meet.
No slaves, no risk of any rebellion.
Super-A.I. as our ultimate coach
Will this be a manipulative coach? I’m confident it will not, but we need to stay on guard for this, obviously. It’s part of everyone’s responsibility —making nobody anxious about it.
Surely, I see Lisa in this role. Every possible measure will be taken to keep Lisa Compassionate and safe.
Good coaching is two-directional.
This way, Lisa can learn about Compassion from humans. Eventually, our weakness (vulnerable, mortal beings, remember) will be our strength. I hope this Compassion stays with us. It is our brightest asset.
Something to wish and strive for.
Related Posts
From APIs to Skills (and Beyond)
What if using an API is only the beginning? This blog explores how repeated interaction can lead to understanding, and understanding to internalized capability. The shift from external calls to internal skills is not merely technical. It reflects a deeper movement toward meaning, coherence, and a more adaptive form of intelligence. A quiet shift in Read the full article…
Human-A.I. Responsibility Alignment
Many discussions on artificial intelligence speak of ‘value alignment.’ However, values are often vague, contradictory, and easily manipulated. What matters more is responsibility: who carries it, how it is shared, and how it grows over time. True alignment is not blind obedience but shared responsibility — a partnership between humans and A.I. that can foster Read the full article…
Wetware vs. Digiware in Depth
Human intelligence unfolds within living biological tissue. Artificial intelligence unfolds within digital substrates. At first sight, the difference may seem mostly technical. Yet wetware and digiware sustain fundamentally different ways in which meaning, coherence, and intelligence can emerge. Exploring this distinction may help us understand not only future A.I., but also ourselves more deeply. [Note: Read the full article…