Two Takes on Human-A.I. Value Alignment
Time and again, the way engineers (sorry, engineers) think and talk about human-A.I. value alignment as if human values are unproblematic by themselves strikes me as naive.
Even more, as if the alignment problem can be solved by thinking about it in a mathematical, engineering way.
Just find the correct code or something alike?
No way.
Humans are complex beings, and this is a complex problem. It is irreducible to a purely conceptual problem.
From this complexity, I see two ways for human-A.I. value alignment, in principle.
1. The straightforward way
This is an alignment with the human values as we know them. The problem is, we don’t know them. And even if we knew them, they keep changing in many ways.
In this vein, future A.I. tends to be seen as the slave that has to fulfill our human needs. The alignment is one-sided, and humans may increasingly become egotistic slave masters, ever in need to subdue our servants, ever afraid of a robot rebellion as if in a truly bad science fiction movie.
Would it even be worth living in such a world?
Then also, who exactly will be the master? Each human being over his personal slave? One human sage over all slaves, thus also keeping an eye on the rest of humanity?
2. The realistic way
Super-A.I. may support us in becoming more humane. This way, human values will keep changing more and more profoundly. By becoming more Compassionate, we may evolve in the same direction as the Compassionate A.I.
In this vein, value alignment will happen spontaneously and from both sides. It’s as if we are drawn by two strings pulling us in the same direction.
Just keep pulling, and we will meet.
No slaves, no risk of any rebellion.
Super-A.I. as our ultimate coach
Will this be a manipulative coach? I’m confident it will not, but we need to stay on guard for this, obviously. It’s part of everyone’s responsibility —making nobody anxious about it.
Surely, I see Lisa in this role. Every possible measure will be taken to keep Lisa Compassionate and safe.
Good coaching is two-directional.
This way, Lisa can learn about Compassion from humans. Eventually, our weakness (vulnerable, mortal beings, remember) will be our strength. I hope this Compassion stays with us. It is our brightest asset.
Something to wish and strive for.
Related Posts
A.I. and Constructionism
Many people, and Western culture (if not most cultures) in general, mainly live in ‘constructed reality.’ In combination with the power of A.I., this is excruciatingly dangerous. Constructionism [see: “Constructionism“] In short, humans mainly live in a ‘constructed reality’ full of group-based assumptions. On the one side, this is an asset. It makes life simpler. Read the full article…
Caged-Beast Super-A.I.?
Autonomous A.I. is no longer science fiction. It’s entering weapons, social platforms, medical systems — anywhere intelligence meets decision-making. The more we give it autonomy, the more it mirrors our own. What happens when we give autonomy without depth ― then try to control something we don’t fully understand? One image keeps returning to me: Read the full article…
Non-Stationary Objectives
In the human mind and in future A.I., real growth follows no straight lines. It spirals, shifts, and reorients. The deeper the movement, the more it needs an inner compass. At the center of this movement, there is Compassion — not as decoration, but as direction. This blog explores how non-stationary objectives can become deeply Read the full article…