‘Doing Good’: Not as Easy as It Seems

May 18, 2018 General Insights, Philanthropically, Sociocultural Issues No Comments

Imagine you are a ‘special kind of therapist’. Good. All kinds of people come by your place with a ‘problem’ and they leave with a sense of relief, glad they came along.

After a while they come back and then the same phenomenon occurs. Friendly faces. Nothing to worry about. ‘Doing good’ seems evident.

Is everything okay?

But let us look a little bit deeper now

(because you are a ‘special kind of therapist’) and what might we see? All kinds of things are possible. For example: people turn to you with a smoking addiction and they immediately get a few cigarettes from you and a good stock of the white thingies. Hm. They leave relieved and are glad they came along. Friendly faces. Everything is okay?

Or more generally: people come with a general addiction and you immediately give something general and also a good stock of generality … Hm. You see: why they come and how they leave gets a different meaning because of this, or not? (You can reread this paragraph later on.)

How far should one go?

How deep should one go?

Lots of serious addicts start their pernicious career with hard drugs… on prescription.

Addiction to superficiality knows many adepts within health care. Their high priest is called ‘Placebo’.

How far should one go?

Were missionaries ‘correct’ by being contrary to the culture of indigenous populations? Or do we see thing ‘more correct’ if we notice that just a lot of problems were the result of it?

Somewhat (but not overly) generalizing, one can say: a weight-reducing diet ‘works’, but it is usually a pendulum that returns stronger than it left. Is ‘helping’ someone at following a weight-reducing diet, ‘doing good’? Not evident.

A lot of alternative medicines are, in theory, clearly based on nothing.

Is this innocent? Or do the people who feel helped eventually end up in a negative spiral?

The latter is quite possible.

It’s even likely.

Is it worth it?

It cannot be said more powerfully than reality itself does it.

It’s not because someone laughs, that it is clear that ‘the good has been done’ for that person.

It might even be the case that in the meantime for this person something entirely different is being done.

It’s possible!

And it has so often been the case. Hiding our head in the sand concerning this matter, would be inappropriate.

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Three Dangers of Careless Depth

The ‘deeper’ has already led to many accidents. Look at the pitiful excesses of Catholicism. It’s just an example. But that should not be a reason to throw away the ‘deeper’. However, one ought to be particularly careful with it. As a starters, one can make a primary distinction between: BLACK – the ‘deeper’ turns Read the full article…

Why Full Teacups Are Not Big Fans of ‘Empty’ Teacups

‘Emptiness’ is a screen on which much can be projected. HA! Of course lots of things are emerging from ’emptiness’. Things of which you may search for some ‘conceptual cause” which cannot be found in that ’emptiness’, because there is simply no ‘conceptual cause’ present in it. That is just what ’emptiness’ means: ’empty’ of Read the full article…

Pied Pipers of Hamelin

There are already more than enough pied pipers of Hamelin. ~~~~~~ One metric ton of so called ‘depth’ is easier to fathom than an ounce of real stuff whatever that may be. You don’t have to look like a spirit of the forest to bring depth. There is no harm in it, but it really Read the full article…

Translate »